Backcheck
Recap · CHI at FLA

Panthers run the Blackhawks off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Panthers earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJun 16, 1:40 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
CHI
Chicago Blackhawks
2
Home
FLA
Florida Panthers
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.40Expected goals3.82
61% share for the better side
19Shot attempts (SOG)37
4High-danger chances4
50Corsi (all attempts)69
Score-adjusted: 43% / 57%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

S. Knight nearly stole a game. Florida controlled 61% of 5-on-5 expected goals (3.82–2.40 xG) and 66% of shot attempts (37–19), but won 3–2—a margin that understates their dominance. Goaltending variance explains the gap: Chicago's goalie outperformed his expected outcome by 0.82, while Florida underperformed their expected goals by the same amount. The Panthers should have won more decisively.

High-danger chances split 4–4, meaning neither team gained an edge in the most dangerous areas. The turning point came at 9:40 of the third when Jesper Boqvist deflected home from the doorstep.

Florida's rush conversion lagged behind its volume: 3 goals on 34 chances. Chicago, working fewer rush opportunities (17), converted twice at a higher rate. On paper, that efficiency split shouldn't matter when one team controls 66% of shot attempts, yet it kept the scoreboard tighter than the underlying numbers warrant.

Depth sustained Florida's edge. F. Nazar (1G, 1A in 20:14), T. Bertuzzi (2A in 19:10), and T. Teravainen (1G, 1A in 18:05) got it done, but Knight's outperformance was the only reason this game remained competitive.

Three Stars

  • #91 F. Nazar — 1G, 1A in 20:14
  • #59 T. Bertuzzi — 2A in 19:10
  • #86 T. Teravainen — 1G, 1A in 18:05
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CHI0 / 4 · 0.93 xG
FLA0 / 4 · 1.00 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CHI2 / 10 · 1.02 xG
FLA3 / 17 · 1.94 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CHI0 / 36 · 0.44 xG
FLA0 / 48 · 0.88 xG

FLA went 3-for-17 from medium danger on 1.94 expected goals — 1.1 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CHI
2 G · 2.40 xG · -0.4
FLA
3 G · 3.82 xG · -0.8
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
S. KnightCHI
+0.8
S. BobrovskyFLA
+0.4

CHI finished -0.4 against expected, FLA -0.8 — S. Knight (CHI) saved 0.8 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CHI
WRIST1/5
SNAP1/22
SLAP0/4
BACKHAND0/0
TIP IN0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/18
FLA
WRIST1/32
SNAP1/3
SLAP0/7
BACKHAND0/5
TIP IN0/2
DEFLECTED1/1
OTHER0/19
CHI
FLA
Off the rush
2 G on 17 · 1.96 xG
3 G on 34 · 3.29 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 1 · 0.12 xG
0 G on 2 · 0.22 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: CHI went 1-for-5, FLA 1-for-32. FLA scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
F. Nazar
#91 · C ·
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 20:14 TOI · +1
T. Bertuzzi
#59 · L ·
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 19:10 TOI · +1
T. Teravainen
#86 · C ·
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 18:05 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • FLA was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 34 rush chances.
  • CHI was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 17 rush chances.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · CHI at FLA · 5:00 PM ET

The Panthers are the model's lean over the Blackhawks on the underlying numbers

By the ModelJun 16, 1:39 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

58%
FLA
Model favorite
42%
58%
CHI50FLA

FLA by 16 points of win probability — a clear lean. Projected score CHI 2.42.9 FLA; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

CHI← edge
edge →FLA
42.0%5v5 xG%49.0%
46.0%Corsi%52.0%
2.17xGF / 602.48
2.94xGA / 602.56
1.84Goals for / gm1.98
2.41Goals against / gm2.21
0.996PDO — luck, not skill0.989

FLA holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.996 vs 0.989) says CHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

Models favor Florida by 58 percent. That's because the Panthers own the play. Florida's 49.0 percent expected goals share crushes Chicago's 42.0 percent, and the territorial advantage is decisive—a 52.0 to 46.0 Corsi split means the Blackhawks defend more than they dictate. PDO (shooting luck) is nearly identical for both teams—Chicago at 0.996, Florida at 0.989—so the gap isn't variance. It's work rate.

The model projects a 2.4–2.9 finish in Florida's favor. That understates how thoroughly the Panthers should control this game.

Chicago's offense runs through Tyler Bertuzzi. At 0.85 expected goals per 60 minutes, he's the Blackhawks' most dangerous threat, with 20 goals and 15 assists backing an 18.0 shooting percentage. Seven of his goals came from high-danger chances—the kind of hot efficiency that punishes teams in a short series. Connor Bedard (0.82 xG/60, 17 goals, 27 assists) drives play from the wing. His 11.8 shooting percentage suggests the goals will arrive in clusters, since his underlying production is genuinely there.

Florida counters with Sam Bennett and Brad Marchand. Bennett carries a 0.97 xG/60 with six high-danger goals, making him a critical interior presence if available. Marchand (0.93 xG/60, 17 goals) brings playoff-caliber finishing at 19.5 percent shooting. Both face health questions that will reshape this matchup if either misses the ice.

None of that matters if Florida executes its system. The Panthers don't need Marchand or Bennett to explode—they need to do what they've done all season: Push more possessions than Chicago sees, force the Blackhawks into the defensive third, and let efficiency finish the work. The model trusts that recipe. So should you.

Players to Watch

Chicago

  • Tyler Bertuzzi: 0.85 xG/60, 20 goals, 15 assists
  • Connor Bedard: 0.82 xG/60, 17 goals, 27 assists

Florida

  • Sam Bennett: 0.97 xG/60, 18 goals, 19 assists
  • Brad Marchand: 0.93 xG/60, 17 goals, 9 assists
Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

CHI
Tyler Bertuzzi20G 15A
0.85 xG/60 · 7 HD · 18.0% sh
Connor Bedard17G 27A
0.82 xG/60 · 5 HD · 11.8% sh
FLA
Sam Bennett18G 19A
0.97 xG/60 · 6 HD · 13.1% sh
Brad Marchand17G 9A
0.93 xG/60 · 3 HD · 19.5% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters