Backcheck
Recap · DAL at COL

Stars steal one from the Avalanche against the run of play

The Stars stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.52–4.74 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 12, 1:01 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
DAL
Dallas Stars
5
Home
COL
Colorado Avalanche
4
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.52Expected goals4.74
65% share for the better side
22Shot attempts (SOG)39
4High-danger chances8
41Corsi (all attempts)84
Score-adjusted: 33% / 67%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Colorado dominated in underlying metrics: 65% of expected goals at 5v5, 64% of shot attempts (39–22), and 8–4 in high-danger chances. Dallas won 5-4 in a shootout anyway. This was a heist.

J. Oettinger made 35 saves on 39 shots (0.897 SV%, +0.74 vs expected). S. Wedgewood made 18 saves on 22 shots (0.818 SV%, -1.48 vs expected). Oettinger bailed out Dallas; Wedgewood couldn't keep up.

On the rush, both teams scored 3 goals—Dallas on 21 chances, Colorado on 35. Dallas also converted 2 of 4 high-danger chances (50%). The Stars' efficiency in high-leverage situations overcame Colorado's volume. Mikko Rantanen's wrist shot from the high slot in the shootout ended it, but Dallas's precision had already won the night.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
DAL2 / 4 · 0.92 xG
COL3 / 8 · 1.87 xG
Medium dangermid-range
DAL1 / 10 · 1.09 xG
COL1 / 19 · 1.84 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
DAL1 / 27 · 0.52 xG
COL0 / 57 · 1.03 xG

COL went 3-for-8 from high danger on 1.87 expected goals — 1.1 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
DAL
5 G · 2.52 xG · +2.5
COL
4 G · 4.74 xG · -0.7
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. OettingerDAL
+0.7
S. WedgewoodCOL
-1.5

DAL finished +2.5 against expected, COL -0.7 — S. Wedgewood (COL) allowed 1.5 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
DAL
WRIST2/17
SNAP0/4
SLAP1/4
TIP IN1/1
BACKHAND0/7
OTHER0/8
COL
WRIST1/31
SNAP3/12
SLAP0/6
TIP IN0/8
BACKHAND0/1
OTHER0/26
DAL
COL
Off the rush
3 G on 21 · 1.58 xG
3 G on 35 · 3.51 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.34 xG
1 G on 3 · 0.42 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: DAL went 2-for-17, COL 1-for-31. DAL scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
N. MacKinnon
#29 · C · COL
1 G · 2 A · 4 SOG · 25:01 TOI · +2
M. Necas
#88 · C · COL
1 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 23:11 TOI · +2
T. Harley
#55 · D · DAL
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 25:52 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • DAL stole this one. COL owned 65% of the xG and lost.
  • S. Wedgewood (COL) gave up 1.5 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • DAL was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/4 on HD chances (50%).
  • COL was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 35 rush chances.
  • DAL was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 21 rush chances.
  • COL created 3 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • DAL created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · DAL at COL · 9:00 PM ET

The Avalanche are the model's lean over the Stars — with PDO regression in play

By the ModelJul 11, 12:23 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

58%
COL
Model favorite
42%
58%
DAL50COL

COL by 16 points of win probability — a clear lean. Projected score DAL 2.32.8 COL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

DAL← edge
edge →COL
51.0%5v5 xG%57.0%
47.0%Corsi%57.0%
2.36xGF / 603.03
2.29xGA / 602.30
2.07Goals for / gm2.63
1.68Goals against / gm1.56
1.024PDO — luck, not skill1.021

COL holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.024 vs 1.021) says DAL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.3–2.8 Colorado win with the Avalanche at 58% win probability. The underlying metrics justify the lean: Colorado dominates at 5v5 with 57.0% expected goals share versus Dallas's 51.0%, and controls territory at 57.0% Corsi compared to 47.0%. This is not a narrow edge.

But both teams are running above true talent at the PDO line—Dallas at 1.024, Colorado at 1.021—which means regression is baked in. Every point of PDO regression translates directly to goal differential over a series.

S. Wedgewood is on a back-to-back; J. Oettinger the same. Both are watch items—tired starters or backup appearances would matter.

Colorado's edge lives in individual skill. Artturi Lehkonen operates at 1.11 xG per 60 minutes with 18 goals and 22 assists, backed by 6 high-danger looks—a conviction scorer. Ross Colton runs 1.10 xG/60 and 7 goals to date, though his 4.9% shooting rate is anemic relative to his volume. Both can punish Dallas's defense.

Jason Robertson is Dallas's counterpunch. He generates 0.96 xG/60 across 25 goals and 21 assists, with 2 high-danger markers and a 12.4% shooting clip—clinical, not lucky. Michael Bunting (8 goals, 14 assists, 7.6% shooting) at 0.83 xG/60 is a secondary threat Dallas can deploy if Robertson draws attention.

The model's read is sound: Colorado controls play and has superior talent. Regression looms for both teams. Workload in both creases introduces uncertainty. But the Avalanche have better tools to weather the downsides.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

DAL
Jason Robertson25G 21A
0.96 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.4% sh
Michael Bunting8G 14A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 7.6% sh
COL
Artturi Lehkonen18G 22A
1.11 xG/60 · 6 HD · 14.9% sh
Ross Colton7G 15A
1.10 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.9% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters