Backcheck
Recap · TBL at WSH

Capitals run the Lightning off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Capitals earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 12:26 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
TBL
Tampa Bay Lightning
2
Home
WSH
Washington Capitals
3
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.38Expected goals4.21
64% share for the better side
19Shot attempts (SOG)28
5High-danger chances8
37Corsi (all attempts)64
Score-adjusted: 35% / 65%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Washington's 3-2 overtime victory obscures the underlying gap: the Capitals generated 4.21 expected goals to Tampa Bay's 2.38, held 64 percent of shot quality, and underperformed their xG by 1.21 goals.

The Capitals controlled play comprehensively. They held 60 percent of shot attempts (28–19 on goal) and led high-danger chances 8–5. Both teams were lethal in transition — Washington three goals on 26 chances, Tampa two on 20 — but the Capitals' volume advantage told. L. Thompson made 17 saves on 19 shots and was perfect on high-danger attempts (5 for 5). A. Vasilevskiy was also strong: 25 of 28, 1.21 goals above expected.

Tampa Bay's collapse came down to inefficiency: 0 for 5 on their best scoring chances. Washington's cumulative edge in volume and quality, despite underperforming xG, proved sufficient, though only after overtime.

Jakob Chychrun's snap shot from the doorstep at 01:19 of overtime provided the finish the Capitals' underlying dominance had warranted.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
TBL0 / 5 · 1.06 xG
WSH2 / 8 · 2.26 xG
Medium dangermid-range
TBL2 / 8 · 0.91 xG
WSH1 / 14 · 1.40 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
TBL0 / 24 · 0.42 xG
WSH0 / 42 · 0.55 xG

TBL went 2-for-8 from medium danger on 0.91 expected goals — 1.1 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
TBL
2 G · 2.38 xG · -0.4
WSH
3 G · 4.21 xG · -1.2
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
A. VasilevskiyTBL
+1.2
L. ThompsonWSH
+0.4

TBL finished -0.4 against expected, WSH -1.2 — A. Vasilevskiy (TBL) saved 1.2 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
TBL
SNAP0/14
WRIST1/10
SLAP0/3
TIP IN1/2
WRAP AROUND0/0
BACKHAND0/0
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/8
WSH
SNAP2/25
WRIST0/9
SLAP0/5
TIP IN1/5
WRAP AROUND0/1
BACKHAND0/1
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/17
TBL
WSH
Off the rush
2 G on 20 · 1.89 xG
3 G on 26 · 2.64 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.20 xG
0 G on 7 · 1.01 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: TBL went 0-for-14, WSH 2-for-25. WSH scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
T. Wilson
#43 · R · WSH
1 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 20:21 TOI · +2
D. Strome
#17 · C · WSH
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 21:48 TOI
J. Carlson
#74 · D · WSH
0 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 26:10 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • A. Vasilevskiy (TBL) stopped 1.2 goals above expected.
  • TBL couldn't convert — 0/5 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • WSH was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 26 rush chances.
  • TBL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 20 rush chances.
  • WSH created 7 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • TBL created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • L. Thompson was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 5 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · TBL at WSH · 7:00 PM ET

Lightning at Capitals: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJun 16, 2:40 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
TBL
Model favorite
51%
49%
TBL50WSH

TBL by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score TBL 2.62.6 WSH; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

TBL← edge
edge →WSH
54.0%5v5 xG%50.0%
53.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.67xGF / 602.62
2.28xGA / 602.62
2.38Goals for / gm2.18
1.85Goals against / gm1.79
1.019PDO — luck, not skill1.018

TBL holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.019 vs 1.018) says TBL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.6-2.6 game with Washington at 49% win probability. This is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

Tampa Bay dominates the underlying play: 54.0% expected goals and 53.0% Corsis at 5v5. The Lightning should control territory, yet both teams are running hot (PDO of 1.019 for Tampa, 1.018 for Washington), which suggests some regression ahead.

The goaltending angle matters here. J. Johansson faces this game on a back-to-back, making a tired starter or backup appearance a distinct possibility.

Brandon Hagel drives Tampa's offense. He generates 1.10 expected goals per 60 minutes, has scored 23 goals on 15.8% shooting, and boasts 26 assists with two on high-danger chances. Anthony Cirelli operates in a similar register: 0.95 xG/60, 15 goals at 17.0% shooting, five high-danger assists out of 18 total.

Washington's answer is Alex Ovechkin, who generates 0.97 xG/60 and carries 19 goals to 17 assists at 13.8% shooting, though only two of those goals qualify as high-danger chances. Anthony Beauvillier supplies secondary offense at 0.89 xG/60 and 14 goals, though his 10.4% shooting rate suggests finish has lagged opportunity.

Victor Hedman shoulders Tampa's defense; Declan Chisholm is Washington's weak link.

The underlying advantage belongs to Tampa. The talent matchup does not. The model calls it even—and it is.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

TBL
Brandon Hagel23G 26A
1.10 xG/60 · 2 HD · 15.8% sh
Anthony Cirelli15G 18A
0.95 xG/60 · 5 HD · 17.0% sh
WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters