Backcheck
Recap · NSH at MTL

Canadiens edge the Predators in overtime

The Canadiens earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJun 16, 2:50 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NSH
Nashville Predators
2
Home
MTL
Montreal Canadiens
3
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.20Expected goals4.35
58% share for the better side
19Shot attempts (SOG)30
5High-danger chances10
53Corsi (all attempts)57
Score-adjusted: 47% / 53%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Nashville's inability to convert on high-danger chances proved decisive in a 3–2 overtime loss. The Predators went 0 for 5 on such opportunities, a conversion rate well below average. Montreal controlled the game's underlying metrics: 58% of expected goals (4.35–3.20), a 61% shot-attempt edge (30–19), and a 2–1 advantage in high-danger chances (10–5). Cole Caufield's overtime snap shot at 4:57 secured the win.

Both goaltenders exceeded their expected performance. J. Saros (Nashville) made 27 of 30 saves while stopping 1.35 goals above expected; J. Dobes (Montreal) allowed 17 of 19 while stopping 1.20 above expected. Montreal's own underperformance—1.35 goals below their xG—meant that control translated narrowly, requiring overtime to settle the result.

Montreal was efficient on the rush, converting 2 goals on 29 chances. Nashville matched that rate (2 on 24) but lacked the volume to matter.

The Three Stars:

  • #48 L. Hutson — 2A
  • #13 C. Caufield — 2G
  • #59 R. Josi — 1A
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NSH0 / 5 · 1.27 xG
MTL2 / 10 · 2.48 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NSH2 / 15 · 1.62 xG
MTL1 / 12 · 1.40 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NSH0 / 33 · 0.31 xG
MTL0 / 35 · 0.47 xG

NSH went 0-for-5 from high danger on 1.27 expected goals — 1.3 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NSH
2 G · 3.20 xG · -1.2
MTL
3 G · 4.35 xG · -1.4
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. SarosNSH
+1.4
J. DobesMTL
+1.2

NSH finished -1.2 against expected, MTL -1.4 — J. Saros (NSH) saved 1.4 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NSH
SNAP2/18
TIP IN0/6
WRIST0/4
BACKHAND0/2
SLAP0/2
BAT0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
POKE0/0
OTHER0/19
MTL
SNAP3/31
TIP IN0/5
WRIST0/3
BACKHAND0/4
SLAP0/0
BAT0/0
WRAP AROUND0/0
POKE0/1
OTHER0/13
NSH
MTL
Off the rush
2 G on 24 · 2.34 xG
2 G on 29 · 3.34 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 2 · 0.29 xG
1 G on 3 · 0.68 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: NSH went 2-for-18, MTL 3-for-31. NSH scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
L. Hutson
#48 · D ·
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 24:42 TOI · +2
C. Caufield
#13 · R ·
2 G · 0 A · 4 SOG · 20:54 TOI · +2
R. Josi
#59 · D ·
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 28:13 TOI · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • J. Saros (NSH) stopped 1.4 goals above expected.
  • Open game — 15 high-danger chances combined (MTL 10, NSH 5).
  • NSH couldn't convert — 0/5 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • MTL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 29 rush chances.
  • NSH was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 24 rush chances.
  • MTL created 3 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • J. Dobes was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 5 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NSH at MTL · 7:00 PM ET

Predators at Canadiens: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJun 16, 2:49 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
MTL
Model favorite
49%
51%
NSH50MTL

MTL by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score NSH 2.52.6 MTL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NSH← edge
edge →MTL
49.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
50.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.48xGF / 602.41
2.58xGA / 602.62
1.84Goals for / gm2.24
2.21Goals against / gm1.96
0.992PDO — luck, not skill1.018

NSH holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.992 vs 1.018) says MTL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model has Nashville and Montreal nearly identical: it projects a 2.5–2.6 goal game with Montreal favored at just 51% win probability. You're looking at a true toss-up.

The deeper numbers explain why. Nashville owns a 50.0% Corsis and 49.0% expected-goals percentage; Montreal sits at 49.0% Corsis and 48.0% xG%. Nashville is marginally the better even-strength team. Montreal's win-probability edge comes entirely from unsustainable luck. Its PDO of 1.018 means it's converting chances at a rate the league almost never sustains—when regression hits, it hits hard.

On offense, the talent tiers matter. Cole Caufield leads Montreal at 0.97 xG/60 and has feasted with 33 goals on a 20.0% shooting rate; that's elite finishing power. Nashville counters with Filip Forsberg at 0.80 xG/60 and a 13.6% shooting rate, good for 23 goals on the season. Zachary L'Heureux, Nashville's dangerous wing, operates at 0.85 xG/60 but has converted just 4 goals on 16.0% efficiency—either underperforming his chances or showing where Nashville's finishing leaves room.

Brendan Gallagher operates as more facilitator than finisher: 0.89 xG/60, 5 goals, 13 assists, and a 4.6% shooting rate that likely reflects his true talent.

Both teams have identical structural issues. Neither generates hard-deadline goals—each runs 0% of their output from high-danger chances, 0% from rebounds. That's not sustainable and tilts toward increased volatility in any given night. Jonathan Marchessault carries Nashville's defensive liabilities; Mike Matheson does the same for Montreal. Both are targets for system pressure.

The pick goes to Montreal at 51%—barely above a toss-up—making Nashville the value bet. When even-strength fundamentals reassert themselves over luck, they favor the Predators.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NSH
Zachary L'Heureux4G 0A
0.85 xG/60 · 1 HD · 16.0% sh
Filip Forsberg23G 17A
0.80 xG/60 · 4 HD · 13.6% sh
MTL
Cole Caufield33G 16A
0.97 xG/60 · 1 HD · 20.0% sh
Brendan Gallagher5G 13A
0.89 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.6% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters