Canucks hold off the Stars
The Canucks stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.05–4.01 and won anyway.
The underlying story
Dallas controlled 57% of expected goals at 5v5 and still lost. Vancouver's victory was a heist: better play, worse result.
Expected goals finished 4.01–3.05 in Dallas's favor (57–43%), yet the Canucks won 5-3. T. Demko stopped 1.01 goals above expected; C. DeSmith surrendered 1.95 more than his workload justified. Dallas couldn't convert high-danger chances—0 for 9. T. Demko was perfect on nine high-danger shots. Dallas scored twice from low-danger positions, inefficiency that usually goes straight into the back of the net.
Both teams were lethal off the rush. Dallas potted 3 goals on 30 chances; Vancouver answered with 4 on 27. The difference lay in precision: Vancouver overperformed their expected goals by 1.95 markers—elite finishing, lucky bounces, or both.
Dallas's power play was genuinely dominant (2 goals on 13 shots), but it wasn't enough. Q. Hughes's wrist shot from the top of the circles in the third period proved the decisive moment, and Vancouver weathered the rest.
The danger ladder
DAL went 0-for-9 from high danger on 2.05 expected goals — 2.0 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
VAN finished +1.9 against expected, DAL -1.0 — C. DeSmith (DAL) allowed 1.9 more goals than expected.
Shot diet
Snap shots carried the volume: VAN went 2-for-26, DAL 3-for-32. VAN scored 4 of theirs off the rush.
- VAN stole this one. DAL owned 57% of the xG and lost.
- T. Demko (VAN) stopped 1.0 goals above expected.
- C. DeSmith (DAL) gave up 1.9 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
- Open game — 17 high-danger chances combined (DAL 9, VAN 8).
- DAL couldn't convert — 0/9 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
- DAL scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
- DAL was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 30 rush chances.
- VAN was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 27 rush chances.
- DAL created 6 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- VAN outperformed their expected goals by 1.9 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
- T. Demko was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 9 high-danger shots.
- DAL power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 13 PP shots (1.13 xG).