Backcheck
Recap · NYI at OTT

Islanders hold off the Senators

The Islanders earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJun 16, 3:00 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NYI
New York Islanders
5
Home
OTT
Ottawa Senators
4
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.53Expected goals3.45
57% share for the better side
23Shot attempts (SOG)32
8High-danger chances3
50Corsi (all attempts)61
Score-adjusted: 46% / 54%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

New York survived a relentless Ottawa offensive — the Islanders won 5–4 despite ceding 58% of shot attempts. The reversal lay in efficiency: New York generated 4.53 expected goals against Ottawa's 3.45, claiming 57% of underlying scoring chances while firing fewer shots.

Quality over volume tells the story. New York's shots averaged 0.091 xG each; Ottawa's 0.057. High-danger chances favored the Islanders 8–3, a gap the final score barely captures.

Both teams exploited the rush. Ottawa scored 4 goals on 27 rush attempts; New York scored 5 on 24 — a slightly more efficient edge that decided overtime. Neither team converted rebound opportunities, leaving Ottawa's 6 created and New York's 3 unconverted on the board.

Ottawa's power play was devastating: 2 goals on 11 shots, 0.71 xG. New York had no such edge, relying on even-strength dominance. Goaltender I. Sorokin absorbed the assault, stopping 28 of 32 for a 0.875 save percentage (–0.55 vs expected). L. Ullmark made 18 of 23 for Ottawa, a 0.783 mark in a losing effort.

The turning point arrived early in the third: Anders Lee's wrist shot from the slot at 18:57. Lee finished with 2 goals and 1 assist in just 13:25, a small volume with outsized impact. T. Chabot recorded 2 assists for Ottawa in 19:47; T. Stützle added 1 goal and 1 assist in the same span — enough offensive output to threaten, not to overcome.

New York won where it mattered: converting chances that actually threatened the net.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYI2 / 8 · 2.59 xG
OTT0 / 3 · 0.67 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYI2 / 12 · 1.51 xG
OTT3 / 19 · 2.18 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYI1 / 30 · 0.43 xG
OTT1 / 39 · 0.60 xG

OTT went 3-for-19 from medium danger on 2.18 expected goals — 0.8 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYI
5 G · 4.53 xG · +0.5
OTT
4 G · 3.45 xG · +0.6
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
I. SorokinNYI
-0.5
L. UllmarkOTT
-0.5

NYI finished +0.5 against expected, OTT +0.6 — I. Sorokin (NYI) allowed 0.5 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYI
WRIST1/12
SNAP3/13
SLAP0/6
TIP IN0/2
BACKHAND0/2
DEFLECTED1/2
OTHER0/13
OTT
WRIST2/24
SNAP1/7
SLAP1/5
TIP IN0/4
BACKHAND0/2
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/19
NYI
OTT
Off the rush
5 G on 24 · 3.18 xG
4 G on 27 · 2.11 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.38 xG
0 G on 6 · 1.05 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NYI went 1-for-12, OTT 2-for-24. NYI scored 5 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
A. Lee
#27 · L · NYI
2 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 13:25 TOI · +2
T. Chabot
#72 · D · OTT
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 19:47 TOI · +2
T. Stützle
#18 · C · OTT
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 19:20 TOI · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • OTT had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
  • NYI had the higher quality looks — 0.091 xG/shot vs 0.057.
  • OTT was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 27 rush chances.
  • NYI was lethal off the rush — 5 goals on 24 rush chances.
  • OTT created 6 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NYI created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • OTT power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 11 PP shots (0.71 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NYI at OTT · 3:00 PM ET

The Senators are the model's lean over the Islanders on the underlying numbers

By the ModelJun 16, 2:59 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

59%
OTT
Model favorite
41%
59%
NYI50OTT

OTT by 18 points of win probability — a clear lean. Projected score NYI 2.32.8 OTT; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NYI← edge
edge →OTT
48.0%5v5 xG%56.0%
49.0%Corsi%53.0%
2.48xGF / 602.66
2.69xGA / 602.12
1.78Goals for / gm2.18
1.94Goals against / gm1.99
0.993PDO — luck, not skill0.993

OTT holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.993 vs 0.993) says NYI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model favors Ottawa. A projection of 2.3 to 2.8 goals gives the Senators 59% win probability—a clean lean on a team that dominates 5v5 play.

Both squads have stumbled lately. New York has surrendered a goal differential of minus-10 over the last 10 games; Ottawa worse at minus-15. That's the puzzle: the team with superior underlying metrics is the one hemorrhaging results.

Where Ottawa's edge lives is clear. At 56.0% 5v5 expected goals against 48.0%, the Senators control shot quality decisively. Possession follows: 53.0% Corsi means Ottawa wins the territorial tilt. Both teams register 0.993 PDO, so neither can blame the puck luck—the underlying play is simply not variance.

Anders Lee is New York's offensive fulcrum. He generates 1.20 expected goals per 60 minutes with 2 high-danger goals, yet his 6.4% shooting rate has limited him to 9 goals and 20 assists. Bo Horvat is more efficient: 18 goals on 12.8% shooting and 3 high-danger goals, though his 0.87 xG/60 suggests overperformance against his opportunities.

Brady Tkachuk drives Ottawa's attack. At 1.19 xG/60 with 11 goals and 20 assists, he mirrors Lee in shot quality but edges ahead in conversion. Dylan Cozens represents Horvat's archetype: 13 goals at 9.5% shooting from 1.00 xG/60, though only 1 high-danger goal among them—a high-volume scorer punching above his opportunities.

New York's defensive soft spot is Alexander Romanov; Ottawa's is Nick Jensen.

Three Things to Watch

  • Ottawa's 56.0% to 48.0% xG advantage—the game's entire narrative
  • The 53.0% Corsi disparity tilts territorial control decisively toward the Senators
  • Ottawa's minus-15 recent differential collides with dominant underlying play—one of these regresses
Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
OTT
Brady Tkachuk11G 20A
1.19 xG/60 · 2 HD · 7.5% sh
Dylan Cozens13G 15A
1.00 xG/60 · 1 HD · 9.5% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters