Backcheck
Recap · DAL at STL

Blues hold off the Stars

The Blues earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJun 16, 3:03 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
DAL
Dallas Stars
1
Home
STL
St. Louis Blues
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.06Expected goals2.92
59% share for the better side
19Shot attempts (SOG)22
5High-danger chances5
38Corsi (all attempts)48
Score-adjusted: 48% / 52%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

STL won 3-1. DAL underperformed their expected goals by 1.06 — the variance that mattered.

The Blues controlled the underlying metrics. They held 59% of 5v5 expected goals (2.92–2.06) and led 22–19 in shot attempts. The structure favored STL.

But DAL stayed competitive in the dangerous areas. Both teams produced 5 high-danger chances. STL converted at 40% (2-for-5); DAL couldn't finish.

J. Binnington made the difference. The STL goaltender posted a 0.947 save percentage on 18-for-19, outperforming his expected total by 1.06 goals. J. Oettinger kept DAL afloat with a 0.92 overperformance (19-for-21), but the gap widened.

The turning point: Pius Suter's backhander from the wing in the third period at 18:59.

Three Stars

  • #96 M. Rantanen (STL) — 1G in 24:09
  • #53 W. Johnston (DAL) — 1A in 20:23
  • #25 J. Kyrou (STL) — 1G in 17:42
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
DAL1 / 5 · 1.02 xG
STL2 / 5 · 1.05 xG
Medium dangermid-range
DAL0 / 6 · 0.68 xG
STL1 / 12 · 1.45 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
DAL0 / 27 · 0.36 xG
STL0 / 31 · 0.43 xG

STL went 2-for-5 from high danger on 1.05 expected goals — 0.9 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
DAL
1 G · 2.06 xG · -1.1
STL
3 G · 2.92 xG · +0.1
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. OettingerDAL
+0.9
J. BinningtonSTL
+1.1

DAL finished -1.1 against expected, STL +0.1 — J. Binnington (STL) saved 1.1 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
DAL
WRIST0/12
SNAP0/6
SLAP0/3
TIP IN0/2
BACKHAND0/2
DEFLECTED1/2
BAT0/0
POKE0/0
OTHER0/11
STL
WRIST1/20
SNAP0/6
SLAP0/2
TIP IN0/2
BACKHAND1/1
DEFLECTED0/0
BAT0/1
POKE1/1
OTHER0/15
DAL
STL
Off the rush
1 G on 20 · 1.63 xG
1 G on 22 · 2.01 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 1 · 0.03 xG
1 G on 2 · 0.28 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: DAL went 0-for-12, STL 1-for-20.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Rantanen
#96 · R · DAL
1 G · 0 A · 4 SOG · 24:09 TOI
W. Johnston
#53 · C · DAL
0 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 20:23 TOI
J. Kyrou
#25 · R · STL
1 G · 0 A · 4 SOG · 17:42 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • J. Binnington (STL) stopped 1.1 goals above expected.
  • STL was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/5 on HD chances (40%).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · DAL at STL · 7:00 PM ET

Stars at Blues: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJun 16, 3:01 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
STL
Model favorite
49%
51%
DAL50STL

STL by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score DAL 2.42.4 STL; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

DAL← edge
edge →STL
51.0%5v5 xG%49.0%
47.0%Corsi%48.0%
2.36xGF / 602.34
2.29xGA / 602.40
2.07Goals for / gm2.00
1.68Goals against / gm2.12
1.024PDO — luck, not skill1.000

DAL holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.024 vs 1.000) says DAL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model sees this as a pick'em: 2.4 goals projected for each team, St. Louis at 51% win probability. Dallas is the hotter team by recent points pace—8-2-0 in their last 10—but that streak carries regression risk.

Dallas holds a marginal territorial edge at 5v5: 51.0% xG to St. Louis's 49.0%, though the Blues edge the Corsi at 48.0% to 47.0%. The underlying play is tighter than Dallas's recent record suggests. The Stars' PDO sits at 1.024, well above the neutral 1.000 baseline; St. Louis's is exactly at 1.000. That gap—Dallas running hot while St. Louis runs neutral—explains the recent divergence. Expect Dallas to cool.

Jason Robertson is Dallas's engine: 0.96 xG per 60, 25 goals, 21 assists, 12.4% shooting, 2 high-danger goals. Arttu Hyry (0.84 xG per 60, 2 goals, 2 assists, 9.1% shooting) is day-to-day with a lower body injury.

St. Louis counters with Jimmy Snuggerud (0.86 xG per 60, 15 goals, 22 assists, 2 high-danger goals, 11.9% shooting) and Dylan Holloway (0.82 xG per 60, 13 goals, 24 assists, 10.8% shooting). Both wings offer volume and efficiency.

C. DeSmith's back-to-back status is the wildcard. Watch for either a backup start or a tired starter; that variable tilts an otherwise even matchup.

Three Stars to Watch

  • C. DeSmith is on a back-to-back—watch for a backup or tired starter.
  • Dallas's recent pace (8-2-0 in the last 10) is reversible if PDO compression hits.
  • Robertson and Snuggerud set the quality bar; whichever winger gets space likely wins the game.

Data: MoneyPuck 5v5 models, NHL API

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

DAL
Jason Robertson25G 21A
0.96 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.4% sh
Arttu Hyry2G 2A
0.84 xG/60 · 0 HD · 9.1% sh
STL
Jimmy Snuggerud15G 22A
0.86 xG/60 · 2 HD · 11.9% sh
Dylan Holloway13G 24A
0.82 xG/60 · 1 HD · 10.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters