Backcheck
Recap · MIN at NYR

F. Gustavsson stands tall as the Wild edge the Rangers

The Wild won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJun 16, 3:12 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
MIN
Minnesota Wild
3
Home
NYR
New York Rangers
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.70Expected goals3.87
51% share for the better side
32Shot attempts (SOG)24
6High-danger chances6
73Corsi (all attempts)68
Score-adjusted: 51% / 49%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Rangers had the cleaner chances—3.87 expected goals to Minnesota's 3.70, a 51–49 split—yet lost 3–1. F. Gustavsson saved the difference, stopping pucks worth nearly three expected goals and finishing +2.87 against expected.

New York generated 3.87 xG on just 24 shot attempts, a sign of high-quality looks. Minnesota scraped together 3.70 xG on 32 attempts, an approach built more on volume than precision. By chance distribution, this was a coin flip. By the scoreboard, it was a rout.

The split came down to execution. New York went 0–6 on high-danger chances—a result that won't happen again soon. F. Gustavsson was a wall on those six chances, posting a perfect save percentage in the danger area. He turned what should have been a tight game into a clear Minnesota win.

Kirill Kaprizov's wrist shot from the wing at 18:24 of the third period was the game's pivot. Minnesota capitalized when it mattered; New York wasted similar looks all night.

Minnesota showed discipline in generating secondary chances. The Wild created four rebound opportunities and converted one, evidence of effective net-front play. New York's shots, for all their quality, too often arrived without support.

I. Shesterkin posted a respectable 0.935 save percentage and finished +1.70 against expected. It was a strong individual effort overshadowed by the team's inability to finish. Six high-danger chances is enough to win with; zero conversions is not.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
MIN2 / 6 · 1.31 xG
NYR0 / 6 · 1.38 xG
Medium dangermid-range
MIN0 / 16 · 1.71 xG
NYR1 / 16 · 2.03 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
MIN1 / 51 · 0.68 xG
NYR0 / 46 · 0.46 xG

MIN went 0-for-16 from medium danger on 1.71 expected goals — 1.7 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
MIN
3 G · 3.70 xG · -0.7
NYR
1 G · 3.87 xG · -2.9
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
F. GustavssonMIN
+2.9
I. ShesterkinNYR
+1.7

MIN finished -0.7 against expected, NYR -2.9 — F. Gustavsson (MIN) saved 2.9 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
MIN
WRIST3/25
SNAP0/13
TIP IN0/3
SLAP0/4
BACKHAND0/3
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/23
NYR
WRIST1/26
SNAP0/4
TIP IN0/9
SLAP0/2
BACKHAND0/2
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/24
MIN
NYR
Off the rush
0 G on 32 · 2.51 xG
0 G on 24 · 2.22 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 4 · 0.62 xG
0 G on 1 · 0.16 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: MIN went 3-for-25, NYR 1-for-26.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Zibanejad
#93 · C · NYR
0 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 22:07 TOI
A. Panarin
#10 · L · NYR
1 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 21:43 TOI
J. Brodin
#25 · D · MIN
1 G · 0 A · 1 SOG · 21:25 TOI · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • MIN generated higher-quality looks than the shot total suggests.
  • F. Gustavsson (MIN) stopped 2.9 goals above expected.
  • NYR couldn't convert — 0/6 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • MIN created 4 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NYR underperformed xG by 2.9 — wasted quality chances.
  • F. Gustavsson (MIN) saved 2.9 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • F. Gustavsson was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 6 high-danger shots.
  • I. Shesterkin (NYR) saved 1.7 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · MIN at NYR · 7:00 PM ET

Wild at Rangers: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJun 16, 3:10 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

50%
MIN
Model favorite
50%
50%
MIN50NYR

MIN by 0 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score MIN 2.52.5 NYR; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

MIN← edge
edge →NYR
52.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
48.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.55xGF / 602.26
2.40xGA / 602.40
2.04Goals for / gm1.88
1.93Goals against / gm1.90
1.007PDO — luck, not skill1.009

The season numbers split 33 — no clear process edge — and PDO (1.007 vs 1.009) says NYR has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.5–2.5 game, with New York at 50% win probability. As close to a pick'em as you'll find.

Minnesota owns the underlying play. The Wild generate 52.0% of 5v5 expected goals to the Rangers' 48.0%—a real edge in puck possession and shot quality. Yet both teams carry nearly identical PDO marks (MIN 1.007, NYR 1.009), suggesting neither is built for an outlier result.

For Minnesota, focus on two names. Hunter Haight generates 1.23 expected goals per 60 minutes at 8.3% shooting with 1G 1A—a dangerous creator with room to break out. Matt Boldy is the more established threat: 22G 18A on 0.89 xG/60 with five hard-chance goals at 13.7% shooting. He's overperforming his chances.

New York counters with its own dual threat. Adam Sykora carries a brutal 20.0% shooting rate on 0.91 xG/60 (3G 1A), dangerous precisely because his goal total lags his underlying creation. Gabe Perreault is the safer producer: 8G 11A on 0.79 xG/60 with two hard-chance goals at 13.1% shooting.

Neither team has scored a hard-chance goal or a rebound goal. That's not sustainable for either side—it signals exploitable depth. Matt Kiersted is Minnesota's defensive liability; Vincent Iorio carries it for New York. Whichever team breaks through on second-chance opportunities gains the edge.

The projection says 50/50. The underlying play favors Minnesota. That gap is the entire game.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

MIN
Hunter Haight1G 1A
1.23 xG/60 · 0 HD · 8.3% sh
Matt Boldy22G 18A
0.89 xG/60 · 5 HD · 13.7% sh
NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters