Jets hold off the Flames
The Jets won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.
The underlying story
The Jets won 2-1 despite Calgary dominating shot volume: the Flames held 55% of shot attempts (33-27 on goal) while high-danger chances went 3-4. Expected goals nearly split even—3.27 Calgary, 3.30 Winnipeg. Yet one team finished, and one did not.
C. Hellebuyck's save percentage of 0.970 was decisive—2.3 goals saved above expectation. Calgary's problem was two-fold: execution and bad luck. The Flames underperformed their expected goals by 2.27, while Winnipeg underperformed by 1.30. That gap suggests Calgary wasted chances more than Winnipeg got unlucky.
Where the Jets separated themselves: shot quality. Winnipeg averaged 0.072 xG per attempt; Calgary averaged 0.045. On the rush, Winnipeg was lethal—two goals on 21 chances, a conversion that offset Calgary's rebound work (three opportunities, zero conversions).
Mark Scheifele's wrist shot from the doorstep (P3, 15:06) proved the difference.
The danger ladder
WPG went 0-for-16 from medium danger on 2.00 expected goals — 2.0 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
WPG finished -1.3 against expected, CGY -2.3 — C. Hellebuyck (WPG) saved 2.3 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: WPG went 1-for-19, CGY 0-for-29. WPG scored 2 of theirs off the rush.
- C. Hellebuyck (WPG) stopped 2.3 goals above expected.
- WPG had the higher quality looks — 0.072 xG/shot vs 0.045.
- WPG was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/4 on HD chances (50%).
- WPG was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 21 rush chances.
- CGY created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- WPG created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- CGY underperformed xG by 2.3 — wasted quality chances.
- C. Hellebuyck (WPG) saved 2.3 goals above expected — stole the show.