Backcheck
Recap · NYI at PHI

Flyers edge the Islanders in a shootout

The Flyers won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 12, 1:29 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NYI
New York Islanders
3
Home
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
4
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.55Expected goals3.42
51% share for the better side
26Shot attempts (SOG)26
5High-danger chances5
62Corsi (all attempts)46
Score-adjusted: 55% / 45%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Philadelphia won a shootout it had no business winning on the underlying numbers—expected goals split 3.42–3.55, a slight edge to the Islanders. The difference: ruthless execution in tight.

The Flyers converted 2 of 5 high-danger chances (40%). The Islanders managed 0 of 5. That gap decided the game long before Matvei Michkov buried the shootout winner from the high slot.

Everything else was even. Shot attempts finished 26–26. High-danger chances were 5–5. Both goalies stopped 23 of 26 shots (0.885 SV%). Samuel Ersson posted a +0.55 against expected, which is solid work, but it was Philadelphia's offense that swung the outcome.

Both teams were equally lethal on the rush: the Islanders scored 3 goals on 32 chances, the Flyers 2 on 25. But in the half-dozen moments that mattered most—in the crease and near the net—Philadelphia seized every opportunity. New York couldn't find the back of the net when it counted.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYI0 / 5 · 0.99 xG
PHI2 / 5 · 1.24 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYI2 / 15 · 1.83 xG
PHI1 / 15 · 1.76 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYI1 / 42 · 0.74 xG
PHI0 / 26 · 0.41 xG

NYI went 0-for-5 from high danger on 0.99 expected goals — 1.0 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYI
3 G · 3.55 xG · -0.6
PHI
4 G · 3.42 xG · +0.6
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
I. SorokinNYI
+0.4
S. ErssonPHI
+0.6

NYI finished -0.6 against expected, PHI +0.6 — S. Ersson (PHI) saved 0.6 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYI
WRIST0/11
SNAP2/19
BACKHAND0/5
TIP IN1/4
SLAP0/5
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/17
PHI
WRIST2/23
SNAP0/5
BACKHAND1/4
TIP IN0/3
SLAP0/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/10
NYI
PHI
Off the rush
3 G on 32 · 3.11 xG
2 G on 25 · 2.66 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 1 · 0.05 xG
0 G on 2 · 0.34 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NYI went 0-for-11, PHI 2-for-23. NYI scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
T. Zegras
#46 · C · PHI
2 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 18:43 TOI · +2
C. Dvorak
#22 · C · PHI
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 15:59 TOI · +2
M. Warren
#41 · D · NYI
0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 11:20 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • PHI was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/5 on HD chances (40%).
  • NYI couldn't convert — 0/5 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • PHI was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 25 rush chances.
  • NYI was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 32 rush chances.
  • S. Ersson was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 5 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NYI at PHI · 12:30 PM ET

Islanders at Flyers: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 12:58 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

54%
PHI
Model favorite
46%
54%
NYI50PHI

PHI by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYI 2.32.6 PHI; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NYI← edge
edge →PHI
48.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
49.0%Corsi%48.0%
2.48xGF / 602.26
2.69xGA / 602.20
1.78Goals for / gm1.96
1.94Goals against / gm1.82
0.993PDO — luck, not skill1.008

PHI holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.993 vs 1.008) says PHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.3 to 2.6 goal game favoring Philadelphia, giving the Flyers 55% win probability. This is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

The underlying advantage belongs to Philadelphia. The Flyers generated 51.0% of expected goals at 5v5 this season while the Islanders managed 48.0%. New York's Corsi splits tighten the gap: 49.0% to Philadelphia's 48.0%, suggesting tighter possession than shot quality implies. On puck luck, the Flyers have benefited from a 1.008 PDO compared to the Islanders' 0.993—a modest edge that compounds over time.

The tension here is classical: who drives play wins in the long run, but hockey allows for single-game variance. Philadelphia's shot quality edge is real. Whether it translates depends on execution.

For New York, Anders Lee remains the focal point. He's generating 1.20 expected goals per 60 minutes, has scored 9 times with 20 assists, and operates at a 6.4% shooting rate despite just 2 hard-hat goals. That gap suggests regression in either direction. Bo Horvat complements Lee at 0.87 xG/60, with 18 goals and 10 assists on 12.8% shooting, backed by three hard-hat goals that signal genuine finish quality.

Philadelphia's attack centers on Owen Tippett and Christian Dvorak. Tippett operates at 0.88 xG/60 with 19 goals and 18 assists on 12.1% shooting, including two hard-hat goals. Dvorak, at 0.81 xG/60, has compiled 12 goals and 21 assists on 11.2% shooting, with three hard-hat goals—a more playmaking-oriented profile.

Defensively, Alexander Romanov is a pressure point the Flyers can exploit. Containing Tippett becomes New York's priority. Philadelphia must convert its underlying edge; Dvorak's defensive limitations matter when possession flips. That fundamental mismatch—shot quality favors Philly, randomness allows New York—is why 55% feels less like a verdict than a reflection of real advantage meeting real uncertainty.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters