Backcheck
Recap · COL at NJD

Devils edge the Avalanche in overtime

The Devils stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.40–2.87 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 11, 1:19 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
COL
Colorado Avalanche
3
Home
NJD
New Jersey Devils
4
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.40Expected goals2.87
54% share for the better side
24Shot attempts (SOG)24
5High-danger chances4
71Corsi (all attempts)60
Score-adjusted: 56% / 44%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Devils won 4-3, but the Avalanche's underlying numbers were better — expected goals favored Colorado 3.40 to 2.87, a 54-46 split. New Jersey overperformed their xG by 1.13 goals, converting low-danger chances that should have stayed unconverted.

The Devils scored twice from spots the opposing goalie needs to have. Their defense held shot attempts even (24-24) and high-danger chances nearly so (4-5), preventing Colorado's superior generation from translating into more goals.

Goaltending was decisive. T. Miner (COL) stopped 20 of 24 — a save rate 1.13 goals worse than expected — while J. Allen (NJD) posted 0.875 on 21 of 24.

Both teams found their edge on the rush: the Devils scored 3 goals on 28 chances, the Avalanche 2 on the same 28. New Jersey's rush efficiency proved decisive. Meanwhile, Colorado created 4 rebound opportunities but couldn't finish any, wasting the fruit of their net-crashing approach.

The game turned at 01:53 of overtime when J. Hughes fired a wrist shot from the slot — the moment that separated a team that generated less from one that finished more.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
COL1 / 5 · 1.10 xG
NJD1 / 4 · 0.98 xG
Medium dangermid-range
COL2 / 14 · 1.56 xG
NJD1 / 10 · 1.25 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
COL0 / 52 · 0.74 xG
NJD2 / 46 · 0.65 xG

NJD went 2-for-46 from low danger on 0.65 expected goals — 1.4 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
COL
3 G · 3.40 xG · -0.4
NJD
4 G · 2.87 xG · +1.1
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
T. MinerCOL
-1.1
J. AllenNJD
+0.4

COL finished -0.4 against expected, NJD +1.1 — T. Miner (COL) allowed 1.1 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
COL
WRIST0/23
SNAP3/7
TIP IN0/7
SLAP0/6
BACKHAND0/2
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/25
NJD
WRIST3/27
SNAP1/8
TIP IN0/1
SLAP0/2
BACKHAND0/3
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/19
COL
NJD
Off the rush
2 G on 28 · 2.40 xG
3 G on 28 · 2.08 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 4 · 0.58 xG
0 G on 1 · 0.26 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: COL went 0-for-23, NJD 3-for-27. NJD scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
S. Nemec
#17 · D · NJD
0 G · 3 A · 2 SOG · 23:35 TOI · +2
J. Hughes
#86 · C · NJD
2 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 22:43 TOI · +1
C. Makar
#8 · D · COL
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 27:38 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • T. Miner (COL) gave up 1.1 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • NJD scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • NJD was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 28 rush chances.
  • COL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 28 rush chances.
  • COL created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · COL at NJD · 1:00 PM ET

Avalanche at Devils: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 1:16 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

55%
COL
Model favorite
55%
45%
COL50NJD

COL by 10 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score COL 2.82.5 NJD; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

COL← edge
edge →NJD
57.0%5v5 xG%50.0%
57.0%Corsi%51.0%
3.03xGF / 602.45
2.30xGA / 602.50
2.63Goals for / gm1.66
1.56Goals against / gm2.23
1.021PDO — luck, not skill0.971

COL holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.021 vs 0.971) says COL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects Colorado at 55% win probability over New Jersey. The 2.8–2.5 expected-goals spread is tight enough to justify the coin-flip metaphor.

Colorado owns the underlying play. The Avalanche generate 57.0% of 5v5 expected goals to New Jersey's 50.0%, and they control possession at 57.0% Corsi. Territorial dominance is clear; the actual quality gap is thinner.

The regression ledger cuts both ways. New Jersey's 0.971 PDO means pucks are bouncing the wrong way—they're due for positive regression. Colorado's 1.021 PDO is the flip side: pucks are bouncing favorably, and regression downward is expected. The tightness of the model reflects the uncertainty around which team's mean reversion matters more.

Monitor S. Wedgewood's status. He's on a back-to-back; New Jersey may start a backup or deploy a fatigued Wedgewood, either outcome shifting the margin.

Colorado's attack centers on Artturi Lehkonen, who generates 1.11 expected goals per 60 minutes with 18 goals and 22 assists. He's scored 6 from high-danger chances at a sustainable 14.9% shooting rate. Ross Colton matches Lehkonen's 1.10 xG/60 but is underperforming: 7 goals on 15 assists with just 1 high-danger goal and a 4.9% shooting rate. Positive regression should follow if he keeps getting touches.

New Jersey counters with Timo Meier at 1.08 xG/60, slightly below Colorado's top two, with 13 goals and 15 assists. Meier has 3 high-danger goals. Jack Hughes carries the secondary scoring load at 0.88 xG/60 with 18 goals and 17 assists, but his 11.5% shooting rate suggests unsustainable luck baked into that total.

Defensively, Colorado's weak link is Nazem Kadri. New Jersey flags Johnathan Kovacevic in that role. In a game this close, which pair plays tighter may settle it.

The xG variance is the story. Colorado's edge is real but modest. New Jersey's pending PDO regression is the wildcard.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

COL
Artturi Lehkonen18G 22A
1.11 xG/60 · 6 HD · 14.9% sh
Ross Colton7G 15A
1.10 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.9% sh
NJD
Timo Meier13G 15A
1.08 xG/60 · 3 HD · 6.7% sh
Jack Hughes18G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.5% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters