V. Vanecek stands tall as the Mammoth edge the Jets
The Mammoth stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.83–4.88 and won anyway.
The underlying story
Utah stole this one. The Mammoth edged Winnipeg 3-2 despite losing the expected-goals battle 4.88–3.83—a 56–44 split that should have favored the Jets.
V. Vanecek was the difference. The Mammoth goaltender stopped 28 of 30 shots (0.933 SV%), outperforming expected by 2.88 goals. C. Hellebuyck was also solid (29/32, 0.906 SV%, +0.83), but Vanecek's surplus decided the contest.
The gap widened in high-danger chances. Winnipeg generated 11; Utah generated 5. That advantage should have translated to multiple goals. Instead, the Jets converted zero and the Mammoth scored twice on the rush despite generating far fewer dangerous opportunities. Utah was lethal on transitions—2 goals on 31 rush attempts. Winnipeg crashed the net harder, generating 8 rebound chances, but couldn't finish any of them.
Winnipeg's underlying play was convincing: they generated 0.080 expected goals per shot compared to Utah's 0.061, a quality-over-quantity advantage. But quality means nothing without conversion. The Jets underperformed their xG by 2.88 goals—a margin that won't repeat.
Dylan Guenther's wrist shot from the high slot at 14:24 of the third period proved pivotal, breaking a tie and giving Utah the cushion it would keep.
The three-star selections tell the story of both teams' efforts: J. Morrissey (2A, 24:09) kept Winnipeg's offense flowing; M. Sergachev (1G, 26:09) buried one for Utah; and D. DeMelo (1G, 22:39) also scored for the Mammoth. Morrissey's assists understate his value—his line controlled the game but couldn't finish.
On another night, Winnipeg's underlying edge converts to at least one point. Not this one.
The danger ladder
WPG went 0-for-11 from high danger on 2.55 expected goals — 2.5 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
UTA finished -0.8 against expected, WPG -2.9 — V. Vanecek (UTA) saved 2.9 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: UTA went 2-for-32, WPG 1-for-27. UTA scored 2 of theirs off the rush.
- UTA stole this one. WPG owned 56% of the xG and lost.
- V. Vanecek (UTA) stopped 2.9 goals above expected.
- Open game — 16 high-danger chances combined (WPG 11, UTA 5).
- WPG generated far more dangerous chances — 0.080 xG/shot vs 0.061. Quality over quantity.
- WPG couldn't convert — 0/11 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
- UTA couldn't convert — 0/5 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
- UTA was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 31 rush chances.
- WPG created 8 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- UTA created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- WPG underperformed xG by 2.9 — wasted quality chances.
- V. Vanecek (UTA) saved 2.9 goals above expected — stole the show.