Backcheck
Recap · OTT at CHI

Blackhawks pull away from the Senators

The Blackhawks earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 1:35 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
OTT
Ottawa Senators
3
Home
CHI
Chicago Blackhawks
7
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.63Expected goals2.94
53% share for the better side
24Shot attempts (SOG)26
3High-danger chances4
59Corsi (all attempts)55
Score-adjusted: 57% / 43%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Blackhawks beat the Senators 7-3 — a convincing scoreline for a game expected goals said should have been nearly even. Chicago's 2.94 xG against Ottawa's 2.63 suggested a tight contest, yet the Blackhawks won by four. They simply finished better.

Chicago was clinical in the high-danger zone, converting 2 of 4 chances (50%). They also scored twice from low-danger areas — opportunities L. Ullmark should have stopped. Most telling: the Blackhawks scored seven times on 22 rush chances. Ottawa scored twice on 21 rush attempts. On the rush, Chicago executed; Ottawa squandered.

C. Bedard led Chicago with three goals and an assist. F. Nazar, whose wrist shot from the high slot proved decisive, added a goal and an assist. D. Batherson posted two assists for Ottawa.

S. Knight made 21 saves on 24 shots (0.875 save percentage), unspectacular but steady. L. Ullmark surrendered 3.1 goals beyond expected on 25 shots (0.760), the cost of facing an opponent that converted relentlessly.

The Blackhawks outperformed their expected goals by 4.06 — elite finishing or fortune, or both. When xG says close and the scoreboard says blowout, the difference is finishing: Chicago executed on the rush, Ottawa did not.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
OTT0 / 3 · 0.76 xG
CHI2 / 4 · 1.59 xG
Medium dangermid-range
OTT2 / 13 · 1.31 xG
CHI3 / 9 · 0.85 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
OTT1 / 43 · 0.57 xG
CHI2 / 42 · 0.50 xG

CHI went 3-for-9 from medium danger on 0.85 expected goals — 2.1 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
OTT
3 G · 2.63 xG · +0.4
CHI
7 G · 2.94 xG · +4.1
012345678
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
L. UllmarkOTT
-3.1
S. KnightCHI
-0.4

OTT finished +0.4 against expected, CHI +4.1 — L. Ullmark (OTT) allowed 3.1 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
OTT
WRIST3/31
SLAP0/6
SNAP0/0
TIP IN0/2
DEFLECTED0/2
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/17
CHI
WRIST5/26
SLAP0/5
SNAP2/7
TIP IN0/0
DEFLECTED0/0
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/17
OTT
CHI
Off the rush
2 G on 21 · 1.86 xG
7 G on 22 · 2.39 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 1 · 0.10 xG
0 G on 3 · 0.33 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: OTT went 3-for-31, CHI 5-for-26. CHI scored 7 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
C. Bedard
#98 · C · CHI
3 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 16:25 TOI · +2
D. Batherson
#19 · R · OTT
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 17:54 TOI · +1
F. Nazar
#91 · C · CHI
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 17:33 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • L. Ullmark (OTT) gave up 3.1 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • CHI was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/4 on HD chances (50%).
  • CHI scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • CHI was lethal off the rush — 7 goals on 22 rush chances.
  • OTT was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 21 rush chances.
  • CHI created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • CHI outperformed their expected goals by 4.1 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · OTT at CHI · 8:45 PM ET

The Senators are the model's lean over the Blackhawks on the underlying numbers

By the ModelJul 11, 2:00 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

59%
OTT
Model favorite
59%
41%
OTT50CHI

OTT by 18 points of win probability — a clear lean. Projected score OTT 2.82.3 CHI; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

OTT← edge
edge →CHI
56.0%5v5 xG%42.0%
53.0%Corsi%46.0%
2.66xGF / 602.17
2.12xGA / 602.94
2.18Goals for / gm1.84
1.99Goals against / gm2.41
0.993PDO — luck, not skill0.996

OTT holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.993 vs 0.996) says CHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model backs Ottawa at 59% win probability—a 2.8–2.3 projection grounded in underlying play. The Senators command 56.0% 5v5 xG to Chicago's 42.0%, a gap that reflects genuine shot-quality dominance, not variance. Ottawa's 53.0% Corsi rate means the Blackhawks rarely possess the puck; when they do, they're defending.

Brady Tkachuk (11G, 2 HD goals) generates the most consistent threat at 1.19 xG/60 despite modest 7.5% shooting—he's creating danger faster than he's finishing it. Dylan Cozens (13G, 1 HD goal) operates at 1.00 xG/60 with 9.5% shooting, similarly prolific in chance creation but converting at a restrained clip. Together they're why Ottawa's edge compounds. Chicago's shot-rate deficit (46.0% Corsi) makes climbing back exponentially harder.

The Blackhawks have snipers, though. Tyler Bertuzzi (20G, 7 HD goals) converts at elite efficiency despite modest underlying chance creation at 0.85 xG/60—his 18.0% shooting rate proves his lethality. Connor Bedard (17G, 5 HD goals) operates from lower-xG looks at 0.82 xG/60 but distributes at 27 assists, a safety valve if Chicago needs to grind.

Both teams show structural weakness in second-chance generation: 0% HD goal rate and 0% rebound rate. Discipline in the defensive zone could be a wedge for whichever team tightens first.

The defensive matchup favors Ottawa's pressure. Chicago's Anton Frondell will absorb significant assignments against Tkachuk and Cozens. Nick Jensen carries the load for Ottawa—a risk given the Senators' forecheck intensity, but Frondell likely has the harder night.

L. Meriläinen playing back-to-back games introduces fatigue risk; monitor whether Ottawa's depth goaltending enters the equation early.

Three Stars

  • Brady Tkachuk (OTT)
  • Tyler Bertuzzi (CHI)
  • Connor Bedard (CHI)
Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

OTT
Brady Tkachuk11G 20A
1.19 xG/60 · 2 HD · 7.5% sh
Dylan Cozens13G 15A
1.00 xG/60 · 1 HD · 9.5% sh
CHI
Tyler Bertuzzi20G 15A
0.85 xG/60 · 7 HD · 18.0% sh
Connor Bedard17G 27A
0.82 xG/60 · 5 HD · 11.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters