Ottawa controlled this game convincingly on the underlying numbers. The Senators held 60% of expected goals (4.21–2.81), a 57% edge in shot attempts (38–29 on goal), and a 4–2 advantage in high-danger chances. Tim Stützle won it with a snap shot from the slot in the shootout.

This wasn't a shootout disguising a tight game—it was a dominant performance that needed the tiebreaker format. L. Ullmark allowed two low-danger goals, lapses that usually sink teams. But Ottawa was efficient enough to overcome them.

D. Cooley (CGY) limited the damage with an exceptional performance: 35 of 38 saves, 0.921 SV%, +1.21 versus expected. That's stopping more than a goal's worth of additional chances—precisely what prevented a wider defeat.

Calgary's power play supplied the only bright spot: 2 goals on 8 shots (0.56 xG). The Flames' rush efficiency was lethal—2 goals on 25 rush attempts—yet couldn't overcome the overall play.

The model sees the Senators as clear favorites here: a projected 2.2–2.8 goal game with Ottawa at 59% win probability. The underlying case is straightforward—the Senators own the possession game.

Through 5v5 play, Ottawa controls expected goals at 56.0% to Calgary's 47.0%. That's the predictive layer. The Senators also command territorial dominance in Corsi, where they sit at 53.0% against Calgary's 49.0%, meaning they consistently drive play into enemy ice. This isn't a fluke; it's a structural advantage.

Ottawa's recent form backs the model. The Senators are 4-5-1 in their last 10, a points-pace that outpaces their opponent. Calgary, meanwhile, sits at -16 goal differential over the same stretch—a sign of teams playing worse than the score initially suggests.

The wrinkle: Calgary's PDO of 0.985 sits below league neutral. That's a team running cold on both the shooting and goaltending sides, which typically signals mean reversion. Ottawa's 0.993 PDO sits closer to center, offering less regression room.

For Calgary, Blake Coleman (0.89 xG/60, 16 goals, 12 assists, 2 high-danger chances, 11.4% shooting) remains the engine. Matt Coronato (0.80 xG/60, 10 goals, 16 assists) rounds out the two-headed attack, though his 6.6% shooting rate leaves upside if regression favors him. Defensively, Calgary's high-danger and rebound rates both sit at 0%, which reads less as disciplined structure and more as variance—teams can't sustain a complete shutdown forever.

Brady Tkachuk (1.19 xG/60, 11 goals, 20 assists, 2 high-danger chances, 7.5% shooting) leads Ottawa's charge. He's not just a volume driver; that 1.19 xG/60 mark signals genuine shot quality. Dylan Cozens (1.00 xG/60, 13 goals, 15 assists) offers secondary punch. Like Calgary, Ottawa's high-danger and rebound rates hold at 0%, a sign that both teams are outperforming natural rates.

The matchups turn on structure. Calgary needs to disrupt Ottawa's puck movement and force Tkachuk into lower-value attempts. Ottawa, conversely, should probe Calgary's Matt Coronato on the backcheck—he represents a weak link. On Ottawa's end, Nick Jensen flags as the defensive liability.

This is a numbers-backed lean on Ottawa—not because they're guaranteed to win, but because their underlying edge is real and Calgary's recent results haven't caught up to their puck luck ceiling.