Backcheck
Recap · OTT at MTL

Canadiens run the Senators off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Canadiens earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 2:24 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
OTT
Ottawa Senators
3
Home
MTL
Montreal Canadiens
4
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.35Expected goals3.65
61% share for the better side
17Shot attempts (SOG)27
5High-danger chances6
55Corsi (all attempts)51
Score-adjusted: 55% / 45%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Canadiens edged the Senators 4-3 in overtime and controlled 61% of expected goals (3.65–2.35)—a dominant margin the scoreboard barely reflected.

Shot attempts (27–17 Canadiens) confirmed the imbalance. The Canadiens generated far higher-quality chances: 0.072 expected goals per shot versus Ottawa's 0.043. The Senators stayed alive through L. Ullmark's 0.852 SV% while S. Montembeault saved 14 of 17 (−0.65 vs. expected).

Both teams excelled on the rush with similar efficiency—the Canadiens scored 4 goals on 26 attempts, Ottawa 3 on 20. The difference was the Canadiens' depth elsewhere. High-danger chances went 6–5 Canadiens, a reflection of sustained offensive pressure.

Alex Newhook's snap shot from the high slot at 1:40 of overtime ended it. The Three Stars were N. Suzuki (2A), C. Caufield (1G, 1A), and D. Batherson (1G, 1A). Suzuki's playmaking and Caufield's scoring embodied the Canadiens' offensive control.

The Senators' tight finish masked a lopsided contest. The Canadiens dictated pace and shot quality; Ottawa hung around through scrappy play and L. Ullmark's sharp work. The xG spread told the truth.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
OTT2 / 5 · 1.16 xG
MTL1 / 6 · 1.54 xG
Medium dangermid-range
OTT1 / 8 · 0.78 xG
MTL3 / 15 · 1.65 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
OTT0 / 42 · 0.41 xG
MTL0 / 30 · 0.46 xG

MTL went 3-for-15 from medium danger on 1.65 expected goals — 1.4 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
OTT
3 G · 2.35 xG · +0.7
MTL
4 G · 3.65 xG · +0.3
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
L. UllmarkOTT
-0.3
S. MontembeaultMTL
-0.7

OTT finished +0.7 against expected, MTL +0.3 — S. Montembeault (MTL) allowed 0.7 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
OTT
SNAP1/26
SLAP0/2
DEFLECTED1/3
BACKHAND1/1
TIP IN0/2
WRIST0/0
BAT0/0
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/21
MTL
SNAP3/28
SLAP1/4
DEFLECTED0/1
BACKHAND0/3
TIP IN0/0
WRIST0/1
BAT0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/12
OTT
MTL
Off the rush
3 G on 20 · 2.03 xG
4 G on 26 · 2.76 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 0 · 0.00 xG
0 G on 3 · 0.52 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: OTT went 1-for-26, MTL 3-for-28. MTL scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
N. Suzuki
#14 · C · MTL
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 19:06 TOI
C. Caufield
#13 · R · MTL
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 17:55 TOI
D. Batherson
#19 · R · OTT
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 17:40 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • MTL generated far more dangerous chances — 0.072 xG/shot vs 0.043. Quality over quantity.
  • OTT was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/5 on HD chances (40%).
  • MTL was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 26 rush chances.
  • OTT was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 20 rush chances.
  • MTL created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · OTT at MTL · 7:00 PM ET

Senators at Canadiens: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 2:11 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

55%
OTT
Model favorite
55%
45%
OTT50MTL

OTT by 10 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score OTT 2.62.4 MTL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

OTT← edge
edge →MTL
56.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
53.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.66xGF / 602.41
2.12xGA / 602.62
2.18Goals for / gm2.24
1.99Goals against / gm1.96
0.993PDO — luck, not skill1.018

OTT holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.993 vs 1.018) says MTL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects Ottawa at 55% win probability in a game it sees at 2.6–2.4 Senators. This is as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

Ottawa dominates the underlying possession game. The Senators generate 56.0% of expected goals at 5v5 to Montreal's 48.0%, and control shot attempts at 53.0% Corsi against Montreal's 49.0%. But Montreal's recent run—8-2-0 in their last ten games—obscures a PDO gap: Montreal sits at 1.018, running hot on luck, while Ottawa's 0.993 suggests the reverse. That variance alone explains why the model won't lean hard either direction.

Brady Tkachuk drives Ottawa's offense at 1.19 expected goals per 60 minutes, combining 11 goals and 20 assists with only a 7.5% shooting rate, suggesting upside if he tightens his finish. His 2 high-danger goals underscore elite positioning. Dylan Cozens (1.00 xG/60, 13 goals, 15 assists, 9.5% shooting) is the secondary threat, though he's underperforming relative to his volume.

Montreal counters with Cole Caufield, whose 0.97 xG per 60 contradicts his 33-goal, 16-assist total—he's shooting at an unsustainable 20.0% rate. Oliver Kapanen (0.83 xG/60, 19 goals, 12 assists) represents Montreal's more reliable secondary option at 17.8% shooting.

Both teams generate 0% high-danger and rebound goals, a tactical mirror that caps their ceilings despite Ottawa's superior shot volume. Nick Jensen is Ottawa's defensive vulnerability; Mike Matheson plays the same role for Montreal.

The model's reluctance to separate these teams makes sense. Ottawa outplays Montreal in every measurable way except recent results. Whether Montreal's 8-2-0 streak survives the statistical pressure, or Ottawa's dominance finally converts to wins, remains genuinely unsettled. The 55% Senators line respects both outcomes.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

OTT
Brady Tkachuk11G 20A
1.19 xG/60 · 2 HD · 7.5% sh
Dylan Cozens13G 15A
1.00 xG/60 · 1 HD · 9.5% sh
MTL
Cole Caufield33G 16A
0.97 xG/60 · 1 HD · 20.0% sh
Oliver Kapanen19G 12A
0.83 xG/60 · 4 HD · 17.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters