J. Daccord stands tall as the Kraken edge the Blackhawks
The Kraken stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 4.47–3.46 and won anyway.
The underlying story
The Kraken won 3–1, but the underlying play suggested otherwise. Chicago controlled 56% of expected goals at 5v5 and registered 10 high-danger chances to Seattle's 2. The Blackhawks played better and lost anyway.
This was goaltending that stole a result. J. Daccord made 29 of 30 saves (0.967 SV%), finishing +3.47 goals above expected. On 10 high-danger chances, he stopped 9. A. Soderblom (Chicago, 21/24, 0.875 SV%) gave up three.
Chicago's finishing collapsed: 4.47 expected goals, 1 goal scored. They underperformed their xG by 3.47. The Kraken, thin on chances, converted what mattered. M. Beniers (1G, 1A in 19:05) and J. Eberle (1G, 1A in 17:31) struck on transition—Seattle netted 2 goals from 18 rush attempts. Eberle's wrist shot from the high slot came in the third period (16:05), the turning point.
The shot-attempt gap (24–30 in Chicago's favor) captured the game: Blackhawks pressed, Kraken sat back and countered. Daccord's 0.967 mark made the strategy work.
The danger ladder
CHI went 0-for-13 from medium danger on 1.53 expected goals — 1.5 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
CHI finished -3.5 against expected, SEA -0.5 — J. Daccord (SEA) saved 3.5 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: CHI went 1-for-30, SEA 2-for-19. SEA scored 2 of theirs off the rush.
- SEA won despite being outplayed by xG (44%). Goaltending or finishing carried them.
- J. Daccord (SEA) stopped 3.5 goals above expected.
- SEA was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 18 rush chances.
- SEA created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- CHI created 6 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- CHI underperformed xG by 3.5 — wasted quality chances.
- J. Daccord (SEA) saved 3.5 goals above expected — stole the show.
- J. Daccord was a wall on HD chances — 90% SV on 10 high-danger shots.