Y. Askarov stands tall as the Sharks edge the Kraken
The Sharks stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.19–4.62 and won anyway.
The underlying story
The Sharks won 6-1, but Seattle owned the game that mattered most: they controlled 68% of expected goals and dominated shot quality. Y. Askarov made it irrelevant.
The Kraken generated 4.62 expected goals against Sharks 2.19, built on 57% of shot attempts and 12 high-danger chances to San Jose's 2. Seattle crashed relentlessly, combining higher-quality looks (0.066 xG per shot vs. 0.049) with 9 rebound opportunities — all for naught. This should have been a Kraken victory.
Instead, Y. Askarov stopped 3.62 goals above expectation. He made 29 saves on 30 shots with a 0.967 save percentage, surrendering only his expected output on high-danger chances: 92% on 12 HD shots. San Jose's goaltending wall held Seattle at arm's length.
The Kraken's collapse at the other end sealed the heist. J. Daccord gave up 3.09 goals above expected on just 20 shots (0.750 SV%), while M. Murray saw three shots and stopped two. Seattle's expected goals advantage meant nothing when they needed it most.
San Jose escaped with a smash-and-grab thanks to ruthless transition play: 4 goals from 21 rush chances, converting positional disadvantage into victory. Tyler Toffoli's wrist shot from the high slot at 3:54 of the third period exemplified their efficiency.
M. Celebrini (1G, 2A) led the assault; J. Klingberg (1G, 1A) and W. Smith (1G, 1A) added finishing touches.
The danger ladder
SJS went 4-for-12 from medium danger on 1.24 expected goals — 2.8 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
SJS finished +3.8 against expected, SEA -3.6 — Y. Askarov (SJS) saved 3.6 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: SJS went 3-for-21, SEA 1-for-33. SJS scored 4 of theirs off the rush.
- SJS stole this one. SEA owned 68% of the xG and lost.
- SJS generated higher-quality looks than the shot total suggests.
- Y. Askarov (SJS) stopped 3.6 goals above expected.
- J. Daccord (SEA) gave up 3.1 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
- SEA generated far more dangerous chances — 0.066 xG/shot vs 0.049. Quality over quantity.
- SJS was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 21 rush chances.
- SEA created 9 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- SEA underperformed xG by 3.6 — wasted quality chances.
- SJS outperformed their expected goals by 3.8 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
- Y. Askarov (SJS) saved 3.6 goals above expected — stole the show.
- Y. Askarov was a wall on HD chances — 92% SV on 12 high-danger shots.