Backcheck
Recap · PHI at NSH

D. Vladar stands tall as the Flyers edge the Predators

The Flyers stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.66–4.35 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 11, 3:15 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
3
Home
NSH
Nashville Predators
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.66Expected goals4.35
54% share for the better side
26Shot attempts (SOG)24
6High-danger chances6
48Corsi (all attempts)66
Score-adjusted: 42% / 58%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Nashville generated superior scoring chances and lost 3-1. Expected goals favored the Predators 4.35–3.66, a 54-46 split — yet the scoreboard belonged to Philadelphia. D. Vladar's goaltending turned a numbers game into a one-way result.

The Flyers' netminder saved 3.35 goals above expected with a 0.958 save percentage. On high-danger chances, he stopped all six he faced. Nashville generated six high-danger chances of its own and converted zero — a disconnect between opportunity and execution that usually corrects itself.

That's where the breakdown lived. The Predators held 48% of shot attempts (24–26 on goal) and created six rebound opportunities without landing any. They had the better underlying game. J. Saros, facing 25 shots, actually outperformed expected by 1.66 goals, but Vladar's performance didn't allow that competence to register on the scoreboard.

Philadelphia's path to victory bypassed close contests. The Flyers scored two goals on 22 rush chances, translating transition into points. T. Konecny's wrist shot from the high slot (18:47, period three) typified the approach: speed, space, precision.

The Three Stars distilled the game. C. York posted two assists in 24:55, orchestrating from the back line. Konecny added a goal and an assist in 18:43, his efficiency a counterpoint to Nashville's struggle. N. Blankenburg earned the final star with one assist in 23:10, Nashville's most consistent presence in a team that underperformed by 3.35 goals.

When one team generates better chances and loses, the scoresheet credits execution. It should credit D. Vladar.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
PHI2 / 6 · 2.18 xG
NSH0 / 6 · 1.41 xG
Medium dangermid-range
PHI1 / 10 · 1.05 xG
NSH1 / 20 · 2.35 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
PHI0 / 32 · 0.43 xG
NSH0 / 40 · 0.59 xG

NSH went 0-for-6 from high danger on 1.41 expected goals — 1.4 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
PHI
3 G · 3.66 xG · -0.7
NSH
1 G · 4.35 xG · -3.4
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
D. VladarPHI
+3.4
J. SarosNSH
+1.7

PHI finished -0.7 against expected, NSH -3.4 — D. Vladar (PHI) saved 3.4 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
PHI
WRIST3/21
TIP IN0/2
SLAP0/3
SNAP0/4
BACKHAND0/3
WRAP AROUND0/0
POKE0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
BAT0/0
OTHER0/14
NSH
WRIST0/19
TIP IN0/11
SLAP0/7
SNAP0/5
BACKHAND0/3
WRAP AROUND0/2
POKE0/0
DEFLECTED1/1
BAT0/1
OTHER0/17
PHI
NSH
Off the rush
2 G on 22 · 2.48 xG
1 G on 28 · 3.01 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 3 · 0.44 xG
0 G on 6 · 0.91 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: PHI went 3-for-21, NSH 0-for-19. PHI scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
C. York
#8 · D · PHI
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 24:55 TOI · +3
T. Konecny
#11 · R · PHI
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 18:43 TOI · +1
N. Blankenburg
#37 · D · NSH
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 23:10 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • D. Vladar (PHI) stopped 3.4 goals above expected.
  • NSH couldn't convert — 0/6 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • PHI was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 22 rush chances.
  • NSH created 6 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • PHI created 3 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NSH underperformed xG by 3.4 — wasted quality chances.
  • D. Vladar (PHI) saved 3.4 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • D. Vladar was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 6 high-danger shots.
  • J. Saros (NSH) saved 1.7 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · PHI at NSH · 8:00 PM ET

Flyers at Predators: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 2:52 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
NSH
Model favorite
49%
51%
PHI50NSH

NSH by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score PHI 2.42.5 NSH; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

PHI← edge
edge →NSH
51.0%5v5 xG%49.0%
48.0%Corsi%50.0%
2.26xGF / 602.48
2.20xGA / 602.58
1.96Goals for / gm1.84
1.82Goals against / gm2.21
1.008PDO — luck, not skill0.992

PHI holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.008 vs 0.992) says PHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The models won't pick a winner. Projections land Philadelphia between 2.4 and 2.5 goals, Nashville at 51%—a differential so slight it barely separates prediction from tossing a coin.

Nashville sits -11 in goal differential over its last 10, a genuine warning sign beneath the close projection. The underlying numbers don't explain away that deficit: Philadelphia leads 51.0% to 49.0% in expected goals, though Nashville edges the shot volume race at 50.0% Corsi% to 48.0%. The real problem is luck. Nashville's PDO sits at 0.992 while Philadelphia sits at 1.008—a gap suggesting variance is working against the Predators.

Both teams face back-to-back fatigue. J. Annunen and D. Vladar each carry the toll; watch for a backup appearance or a starter running on fumes.

Offense tilts toward Philadelphia, barely. Owen Tippett generates 0.88 expected goals per 60 and has scored 19 times on 12.1% shooting—the kind of efficiency that tends to hold, backed by two high-danger goals. Christian Dvorak sits at 0.81 xG/60 with 12 goals on 11.2% shooting and three high-danger goals, a secondary threat worth monitoring.

Nashville's two scorers cut different profiles. Zachary L'Heureux owns a 16.0% shooting rate on just four goals; his expected output far exceeds what he's scored, making him volatile and potentially due for regression. Filip Forsberg, meanwhile, has produced at volume: 23 goals and a 13.6% shooting rate, with four high-danger goals.

Each team has a defensive weak link the other will hunt: Christian Dvorak for Philadelphia, Jonathan Marchessault for Nashville. Not catastrophes, just angles.

Neither team shoots well on high-danger chances or rebounds—both sit at 0%. It's a statistical oddity, but if either finds a rebound goal or a tip-in, the illusion of tightness breaks fast.

The projection holds: too even to call.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
NSH
Zachary L'Heureux4G 0A
0.85 xG/60 · 1 HD · 16.0% sh
Filip Forsberg23G 17A
0.80 xG/60 · 4 HD · 13.6% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters