Backcheck
Recap · OTT at PHI

Senators edge the Flyers in overtime

The Senators won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 11, 3:04 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
OTT
Ottawa Senators
3
Home
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
2
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.71Expected goals2.77
51% share for the better side
14Shot attempts (SOG)22
5High-danger chances6
39Corsi (all attempts)56
Score-adjusted: 37% / 63%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Philadelphia dominated possession but couldn't convert: the Flyers held 61% of shot attempts (22–14 on goal), yet Tim Stützle won it 3–2 in overtime for Ottawa. Expected goals nearly mirrored the shot split—2.77 for the Flyers, 2.71 for the Senators—but scoreline rarely flows from volume alone.

Shot quality did. Ottawa's attempts generated 0.070 xG per shot; Philadelphia's, just 0.050. The Flyers held more high-danger chances (6–5) but couldn't capitalize. That's where goaltending enters: L. Ullmark stopped 20 of 22 for Ottawa (+0.77 vs expected), while S. Ersson allowed 3 on 14 (0.786 SV%). Ullmark's overperformance absorbed all of Philadelphia's underperformance—the Flyers were 0.77 goals worse than their xG line suggested.

The rush was the lone category where possession translated cleanly. Ottawa scored three times on 23 rush chances; Philadelphia twice on 25. It wasn't a gap—it was the difference.

Tim Stützle's snap from the doorstep at 03:19 of overtime ended it. Quality over volume—a recurring theme in a game where the shot count lied.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
OTT1 / 5 · 1.34 xG
PHI1 / 6 · 1.45 xG
Medium dangermid-range
OTT2 / 9 · 0.99 xG
PHI1 / 8 · 0.77 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
OTT0 / 25 · 0.38 xG
PHI0 / 42 · 0.55 xG

OTT went 2-for-9 from medium danger on 0.99 expected goals — 1.0 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
OTT
3 G · 2.71 xG · +0.3
PHI
2 G · 2.77 xG · -0.8
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
L. UllmarkOTT
+0.8
S. ErssonPHI
-0.3

OTT finished +0.3 against expected, PHI -0.8 — L. Ullmark (OTT) saved 0.8 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
OTT
SNAP1/18
WRIST0/1
SLAP1/3
BACKHAND1/4
TIP IN0/2
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/10
PHI
SNAP2/18
WRIST0/8
SLAP0/3
BACKHAND0/2
TIP IN0/4
DEFLECTED0/0
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/20
OTT
PHI
Off the rush
3 G on 23 · 2.41 xG
2 G on 25 · 2.19 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 2 · 0.23 xG
0 G on 1 · 0.23 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: OTT went 1-for-18, PHI 2-for-18. OTT scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
T. Stützle
#18 · C · OTT
2 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 18:26 TOI · +2
C. Dvorak
#22 · C · PHI
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 16:51 TOI · +1
J. Drysdale
#9 · D · PHI
1 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 24:35 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • PHI had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
  • OTT had the higher quality looks — 0.070 xG/shot vs 0.050.
  • PHI was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 25 rush chances.
  • OTT was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 23 rush chances.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · OTT at PHI · 1:00 PM ET

Senators at Flyers: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 3:02 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

52%
OTT
Model favorite
52%
48%
OTT50PHI

OTT by 4 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score OTT 2.42.3 PHI; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

OTT← edge
edge →PHI
56.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
53.0%Corsi%48.0%
2.66xGF / 602.26
2.12xGA / 602.20
2.18Goals for / gm1.96
1.99Goals against / gm1.82
0.993PDO — luck, not skill1.008

OTT holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.993 vs 1.008) says PHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.4-2.3 Senators win with Ottawa at 52% win probability — this is essentially a pick'em.

Ottawa owns the underlying play, controlling 56.0% expected goals against Philadelphia's 51.0%. That edge extends to territory: the Senators drive the puck at 53.0% Corsi, so they should spend most of the night in the Flyers' end. The catch is finishing. Ottawa's PDO of 0.993 suggests their actual goals have trailed their shot quality, while Philadelphia's 1.008 indicates they've gotten fortunate on the other end.

Goaltending uncertainty adds noise. D. Vladar and L. Ullmark both work back-to-backs, which could push either team toward a backup or force a tired starter into duty — a variable that reshapes the game's tempo.

Brady Tkachuk anchors Ottawa's attack at 1.19 expected goals per 60 minutes: 11 goals, 20 assists, 2 high-danger goals, 7.5% shooting rate. He's generating premium looks and converting them at a healthy clip. Dylan Cozens supplies secondary scoring at 1.00 xG/60 with 13 goals, 15 assists, 1 high-danger goal, and a 9.5% shooting rate — efficiency above his volume.

For Philadelphia, Owen Tippett leads with 19 goals, 18 assists, 2 high-danger goals, and a 12.1% shooting rate on just 0.88 xG/60 — he's finding soft ice on modest shot volume. Christian Dvorak (0.81 xG/60, 12 goals, 21 assists, 3 high-danger goals, 11.2% shooting) rounds out the secondary core.

Nick Jensen represents Ottawa's defensive weak point; Christian Dvorak serves that role for Philadelphia.

Neither team has posted above-expected rates on high-danger or rebound goals this season, meaning both rely on the pace and puck placement that generated chances in the first place.

Ottawa's superior underlying numbers favor the Senators. But Philadelphia at home carries real weight, and the goaltending lottery adds variance neither team controls. Expect the team that manages its game cleaner to win.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

OTT
Brady Tkachuk11G 20A
1.19 xG/60 · 2 HD · 7.5% sh
Dylan Cozens13G 15A
1.00 xG/60 · 1 HD · 9.5% sh
PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters