Backcheck
Recap · NYI at NJD

Islanders steal one from the Devils against the run of play

The Islanders stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 1.86–4.69 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 11, 3:26 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NYI
New York Islanders
3
Home
NJD
New Jersey Devils
2
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

1.86Expected goals4.69
72% share for the better side
24Shot attempts (SOG)35
1High-danger chances7
39Corsi (all attempts)75
Score-adjusted: 36% / 64%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Islanders won 3-2 in overtime. The Devils generated 72% of expected goals. This was a heist by New York.

The Devils controlled the shot map — 59% of attempts, 35 to 24 on goal — but the puck traffic didn't translate to the scoreboard. Expected goals finished 4.69 to 1.86, a 72-28 split: New Jersey was substantially more dangerous by every process metric. They generated 7 high-danger chances to the Islanders' 1, creating looks at a higher caliber — 0.063 xG per shot versus 0.048. The Devils should have won this game.

They didn't, because of I. Sorokin. The Islanders' goaltender stopped 33 of 35 shots (0.943 SV%), a +2.69 overperformance that carried overtime. He was a wall on high-danger chances — 100% save percentage on the 7 high-danger shots the Devils generated. J. Markstrom faced easier volume — 21 of 24 shots — yet finished at 0.875 SV%, underperforming his xG by 1.14. The Devils had elite process. Their goaltender didn't match it. The Islanders' goalie wouldn't budge.

The Devils could not finish. Zero goals on seven high-danger chances is variance that doesn't repeat. The Islanders capitalized on what they got: 2 goals on 14 rush chances. Mathew Barzal's overtime winner at 01:17 ended a game New Jersey should have closed out.

New Jersey crashed the crease hard — 7 rebound opportunities created, 0 converted. The Islanders created 3 and converted 1. That marginal efficiency, paired with Sorokin's brilliance, determined the outcome.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYI1 / 1 · 0.48 xG
NJD0 / 7 · 1.56 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYI2 / 7 · 0.84 xG
NJD1 / 22 · 2.44 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYI0 / 31 · 0.53 xG
NJD1 / 46 · 0.69 xG

NJD went 0-for-7 from high danger on 1.56 expected goals — 1.6 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYI
3 G · 1.86 xG · +1.1
NJD
2 G · 4.69 xG · -2.7
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
I. SorokinNYI
+2.7
J. MarkstromNJD
-1.1

NYI finished +1.1 against expected, NJD -2.7 — I. Sorokin (NYI) saved 2.7 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYI
WRIST1/14
SNAP1/3
TIP IN0/2
BACKHAND0/4
SLAP0/3
POKE1/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/12
NJD
WRIST0/31
SNAP1/10
TIP IN0/5
BACKHAND0/2
SLAP1/2
POKE0/2
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/22
NYI
NJD
Off the rush
2 G on 14 · 1.28 xG
1 G on 36 · 3.15 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 3 · 0.36 xG
0 G on 7 · 1.12 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NYI went 1-for-14, NJD 0-for-31. NYI scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
T. Meier
#28 · R · NJD
1 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 22:07 TOI
J. Bratt
#63 · L · NJD
0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 21:55 TOI
B. Horvat
#14 · C · NYI
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 17:45 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • NYI stole this one. NJD owned 72% of the xG and lost.
  • NYI generated higher-quality looks than the shot total suggests.
  • I. Sorokin (NYI) stopped 2.7 goals above expected.
  • J. Markstrom (NJD) gave up 1.1 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • NJD generated far more dangerous chances — 0.063 xG/shot vs 0.048. Quality over quantity.
  • NJD couldn't convert — 0/7 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • NYI was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 14 rush chances.
  • NJD created 7 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NYI created 3 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NJD underperformed xG by 2.7 — wasted quality chances.
  • I. Sorokin (NYI) saved 2.7 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • I. Sorokin was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 7 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NYI at NJD · 7:00 PM ET

Islanders at Devils: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 3:23 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

54%
NJD
Model favorite
46%
54%
NYI50NJD

NJD by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYI 2.52.7 NJD; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NYI← edge
edge →NJD
48.0%5v5 xG%50.0%
49.0%Corsi%51.0%
2.48xGF / 602.45
2.69xGA / 602.50
1.78Goals for / gm1.66
1.94Goals against / gm2.23
0.993PDO — luck, not skill0.971

The season numbers split 33 — no clear process edge — and PDO (0.993 vs 0.971) says NYI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.5-2.7 goal result with New Jersey at 54% win probability. This is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

New Jersey has controlled play. The Devils generated 50.0% of expected goals and possessed 51.0% of shot attempts—both edges over the Islanders' 48.0% and 49.0%. But the Devils are running cold. A PDO of 0.971, a measure of puck luck and bounces, says variance is against New Jersey. The Islanders' 0.993 means regression favors the Devils. In a 2.5-goal projection, luck decides it.

I. Sorokin plays on back-to-back. Monitor whether the Islanders deploy a backup or risk their starter fatigued—that choice could tilt a game where a single goal is the margin.

The edge goes to whoever shoots cleaner. Anders Lee generates 1.20 xG/60 and has 9 goals on 6.4% efficiency; Jack Hughes matches that intensity with 18 goals at 11.5%. Bo Horvat (18 goals, 12.8%) is the Isles' deadliest scorer. Timo Meier brings 13 goals and a 6.7% rate for the Devils. Lee has 2 high-danger goals, Meier 3—both signs of clinical finishes—yet neither team has scored from high-danger or rebound chances all season. Zero percent from in-close means every goal lives in structure or luck. The team that shoots better from distance and limits defensive breakdowns wins.

Alexander Romanov (Islanders) and Johnathan Kovacevic (Devils) are defensive weak points. When either falters, the opponent's finishers strike.

A genuine coin flip. Take the model's 54% and hold it.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
NJD
Timo Meier13G 15A
1.08 xG/60 · 3 HD · 6.7% sh
Jack Hughes18G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.5% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters