Backcheck
Recap · WSH at CAR

L. Thompson stands tall as the Capitals edge the Hurricanes

The Capitals stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.78–4.67 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 11, 3:33 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
WSH
Washington Capitals
4
Home
CAR
Carolina Hurricanes
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.78Expected goals4.67
55% share for the better side
28Shot attempts (SOG)31
5High-danger chances8
49Corsi (all attempts)70
Score-adjusted: 36% / 64%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Capitals won 4-1 despite trailing in expected goals 3.78–4.67. Carolina controlled 55% of the xG at 5v5 and 52% of shot attempts (31–28). They had the chances; Washington converted.

L. Thompson's performance redefined the game. He made 30 of 31 saves (0.968 SV%) and posted +3.67 against expected, turning a dominant xG advantage for the Hurricanes into a lopsided defeat. The Capitals were clinical: 3 for 5 on high-danger chances (60%) and 2 goals on the rush.

The Hurricanes' wasted chances told the story. They underperformed their 4.67 xG by 3.67 goals. High-danger chances finished 8–5 in their favor. F. Andersen stopped 24 of 27 (0.889 SV%, +0.78 vs expected), but he inherited a losing situation that his save percentage couldn't overcome.

The turning point came early in the third period at 19:29, when Alex Ovechkin's wrist shot from the wing broke through and widened the gap. From there, the Capitals controlled the high-danger zone and the transition game simultaneously—a rare alignment that Carolina's defense couldn't manage.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
WSH3 / 5 · 1.65 xG
CAR1 / 8 · 2.04 xG
Medium dangermid-range
WSH1 / 14 · 1.54 xG
CAR0 / 20 · 2.19 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
WSH0 / 30 · 0.59 xG
CAR0 / 42 · 0.44 xG

CAR went 0-for-20 from medium danger on 2.19 expected goals — 2.2 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
WSH
4 G · 3.78 xG · +0.2
CAR
1 G · 4.67 xG · -3.7
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
L. ThompsonWSH
+3.7
F. AndersenCAR
+0.8

WSH finished +0.2 against expected, CAR -3.7 — L. Thompson (WSH) saved 3.7 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
WSH
SNAP2/9
WRIST2/20
TIP IN0/3
SLAP0/4
BACKHAND0/3
OTHER0/10
CAR
SNAP1/30
WRIST0/9
TIP IN0/6
SLAP0/2
BACKHAND0/1
OTHER0/22
WSH
CAR
Off the rush
2 G on 23 · 2.42 xG
0 G on 27 · 3.02 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 2 · 0.40 xG
0 G on 1 · 0.19 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: WSH went 2-for-9, CAR 1-for-30. WSH scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Carlson
#74 · D · WSH
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 22:51 TOI · +2
A. Ovechkin
#8 · L · WSH
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 14:48 TOI · +2
S. Gostisbehere
#4 · D · CAR
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 20:00 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • WSH stole this one. CAR owned 55% of the xG and lost.
  • L. Thompson (WSH) stopped 3.7 goals above expected.
  • WSH was clinical in the high-danger zone — 3/5 on HD chances (60%).
  • WSH was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 23 rush chances.
  • CAR underperformed xG by 3.7 — wasted quality chances.
  • L. Thompson (WSH) saved 3.7 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · WSH at CAR · 7:00 PM ET

The Hurricanes are the model's lean over the Capitals — with PDO regression in play

By the ModelJul 11, 3:31 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

58%
CAR
Model favorite
42%
58%
WSH50CAR

CAR by 16 points of win probability — a clear lean. Projected score WSH 2.52.9 CAR; 17% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

WSH← edge
edge →CAR
50.0%5v5 xG%56.0%
49.0%Corsi%60.0%
2.62xGF / 602.98
2.62xGA / 602.31
2.18Goals for / gm2.26
1.79Goals against / gm1.95
1.018PDO — luck, not skill0.984

CAR holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.018 vs 0.984) says WSH has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a WSH 2.5–2.9 CAR game with the Hurricanes at 58% win probability.

Carolina arrives as the hotter team by points pace, posting a 6–4–0 record over their last 10. But the predictive edge runs deeper. The Hurricanes own the underlying play: 56.0% 5v5 expected goals to Washington's 50.0%, and they drive possession at 60.0% Corsi to the Capitals' 49.0%. Territorial dominance translates.

The PDO story is where regression risk emerges. Carolina's PDO sits at 0.984—running cold, due for positive reversion. Washington's PDO is 1.018—running hot, expect some regression. This divergence captures a simple mechanic: lucky finishes regress, and the Capitals' shooting touch is borrowed time.

B. Bussi is on a back-to-back for Washington. Monitor for either a backup start or fatigue in the starter.

Players to Watch

Washington

  • Alex Ovechkin — 0.97 xG/60, 19G 17A, 2 HD goals, 13.8% shooting
  • Anthony Beauvillier — 0.89 xG/60, 14G 9A, 2 HD goals, 10.4% shooting

Carolina

  • Jackson Blake — 1.06 xG/60, 14G 19A, 2 HD goals, 10.9% shooting
  • Seth Jarvis — 0.98 xG/60, 17G 12A, 1 HD goals, 11.9% shooting
Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
CAR
Jackson Blake14G 19A
1.06 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.9% sh
Seth Jarvis17G 12A
0.98 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.9% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters