Backcheck
Recap · BUF at COL

Avalanche run the Sabres off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Avalanche earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 3:53 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
BUF
Buffalo Sabres
3
Home
COL
Colorado Avalanche
6
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.93Expected goals5.60
66% share for the better side
21Shot attempts (SOG)34
4High-danger chances6
55Corsi (all attempts)72
Score-adjusted: 48% / 52%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Colorado's 6-3 win was even more dominant than the scoreline suggested. The Avalanche controlled 66% of expected goals (5.60–2.93), a gap that points to overwhelming play underneath the goal differential.

The separation came from efficiency and volume. Colorado generated higher-danger chances at 0.078 xG per shot versus Buffalo's 0.053—a meaningful gap in shot quality. On rush chances, Colorado buried four goals on 38 attempts; Buffalo managed two on 25. When you dominate both quantity and conversion rate, the score follows.

Buffalo's goaltending split underscores the gap. U. Luukkonen was exceptional, stopping 2.09 goals above expected, yet the team still fell by three. A. Lyon's limited work (-1.49 vs expected) completed the collapse. M. Blackwood faced an easier night (18/21 saves) because Colorado's defense suffocated opportunity generation.

The high-danger chance margin (6–4) and shot-attempt ratio (62–38) both reflected the same story: one direction of play. Buffalo generated some pressure through rebounding (3 chances, 1 goal), but never threatened the game's control.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
BUF1 / 4 · 0.84 xG
COL2 / 6 · 2.65 xG
Medium dangermid-range
BUF2 / 17 · 1.63 xG
COL3 / 17 · 1.84 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
BUF0 / 34 · 0.45 xG
COL1 / 49 · 1.11 xG

COL went 3-for-17 from medium danger on 1.84 expected goals — 1.2 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
BUF
3 G · 2.93 xG · +0.1
COL
6 G · 5.60 xG · +0.4
01234567
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
U. LuukkonenBUF
+2.1
A. LyonBUF
-1.5
M. BlackwoodCOL
-0.1

BUF finished +0.1 against expected, COL +0.4 — U. Luukkonen (BUF) saved 2.1 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
BUF
WRIST0/17
SNAP1/6
SLAP2/7
TIP IN0/4
BACKHAND0/3
BAT0/1
BETWEEN LEGS0/1
OTHER0/16
COL
WRIST2/25
SNAP4/15
SLAP0/7
TIP IN0/8
BACKHAND0/2
BAT0/1
BETWEEN LEGS0/0
OTHER0/14
BUF
COL
Off the rush
2 G on 25 · 1.91 xG
4 G on 38 · 3.60 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 3 · 0.54 xG
1 G on 2 · 0.52 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: BUF went 0-for-17, COL 2-for-25. COL scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Necas
#88 · C · COL
2 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 21:37 TOI · +4
T. Thompson
#72 · C · BUF
1 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 18:37 TOI · -1
G. Brindley
#54 · C · COL
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 13:02 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • U. Luukkonen (BUF) stopped 2.1 goals above expected.
  • A. Lyon (BUF) gave up 1.5 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • COL generated far more dangerous chances — 0.078 xG/shot vs 0.053. Quality over quantity.
  • COL was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 38 rush chances.
  • BUF was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 25 rush chances.
  • BUF created 3 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • U. Luukkonen (BUF) saved 2.6 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • A. Lyon (BUF) saved 3.6 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · BUF at COL · 9:00 PM ET

The Avalanche are the model's lean over the Sabres — with PDO regression in play

By the ModelJul 11, 3:52 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

58%
COL
Model favorite
42%
58%
BUF50COL

COL by 16 points of win probability — a clear lean. Projected score BUF 2.42.9 COL; 17% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

BUF← edge
edge →COL
50.0%5v5 xG%57.0%
49.0%Corsi%57.0%
2.55xGF / 603.03
2.55xGA / 602.30
2.35Goals for / gm2.63
1.90Goals against / gm1.56
1.020PDO — luck, not skill1.021

COL holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.020 vs 1.021) says COL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

Colorado's edge here is structural. The model projects a 2.4-2.9 game with the Avalanche at 58% win probability — the clearest read in a tight matchup.

The underlying play bears that out. Colorado dominates 5v5 possession with 57.0% Corsi while generating 57.0% xG, compared to Buffalo's 49.0% Corsi and 50.0% xG. That's systematic out-play in territory and chance creation — the Sabres are being out-possessed and out-chanced.

Recent form widens the gap. The Avalanche are 6-1-3 over their last 10, while Buffalo sits at -7 goal differential in the same stretch. One team is surging; the other is adrift.

Both carry a regression risk. Colorado's 1.021 PDO and Buffalo's 1.020 are running hot, inflating recent results. Some of that luck will evaporate; the model's 58% already accounts for it.

Colorado owns the rest edge — 1 day of layoff versus Buffalo's 4. That's marginal against the underlying talent gap.

S. Wedgewood on a back-to-back for Buffalo could matter. If he's benched or visibly fatigued, Colorado runs the table. If he's sharp, it's Colorado's edge in shot quality that carries the day.

The key matchup is Artturi Lehkonen (1.11 xG/60, 18G 22A, 6 HD goals) against Buffalo's top targets. Jason Zucker (1.07 xG/60, 14G 14A, 6 HD goals, 15.1% shooting) and Josh Doan (1.01 xG/60, 15G 18A, 2 HD goals, 11.5% shooting) will carry the Sabres' offense, but Lehkonen's xG volume and efficiency edge suggests Colorado's scorers will land first.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

BUF
Jason Zucker14G 14A
1.07 xG/60 · 6 HD · 15.1% sh
Josh Doan15G 18A
1.01 xG/60 · 2 HD · 11.5% sh
COL
Artturi Lehkonen18G 22A
1.11 xG/60 · 6 HD · 14.9% sh
Ross Colton7G 15A
1.10 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.9% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters