Backcheck
Recap · PHI at DAL

Stars run the Flyers off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Stars earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 4:17 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
1
Home
DAL
Dallas Stars
5
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.16Expected goals4.33
67% share for the better side
21Shot attempts (SOG)28
4High-danger chances8
44Corsi (all attempts)60
Score-adjusted: 48% / 52%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Flyers underperformed their expected goals by 1.16 — they had 2.16 xG but scored just once. Dallas still crushed them 5–1, controlling 67% of 5v5 expected goals (4.33–2.16) and generating far better scoring chances. High-danger chances went 8–4 Dallas's way. J. Oettinger's elite goaltending (1.16 above expected saves) turned Dallas's dominance into a rout, while Philadelphia's net results failed to match their underlying chances.

Dallas's finish was clinical. They generated 0.072 expected goals per shot versus Philadelphia's 0.049 — fewer attempts, but sharper. The rush was lethal: four goals on 32 chances, a conversion rate that punished transition lapses. Tyler Seguin's wrist shot from the high slot at 13:51 of the third marked the turning point, though Dallas had already seized control.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
PHI1 / 4 · 0.90 xG
DAL1 / 8 · 1.83 xG
Medium dangermid-range
PHI0 / 9 · 0.93 xG
DAL3 / 17 · 1.88 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
PHI0 / 31 · 0.34 xG
DAL1 / 35 · 0.62 xG

DAL went 3-for-17 from medium danger on 1.88 expected goals — 1.1 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
PHI
1 G · 2.16 xG · -1.2
DAL
5 G · 4.33 xG · +0.7
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
D. VladarPHI
-0.7
J. OettingerDAL
+1.2

PHI finished -1.2 against expected, DAL +0.7 — J. Oettinger (DAL) saved 1.2 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
PHI
SNAP0/18
WRIST0/0
BACKHAND1/5
TIP IN0/2
SLAP0/3
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
BAT0/1
OTHER0/13
DAL
SNAP0/20
WRIST4/13
BACKHAND1/6
TIP IN0/5
SLAP0/2
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
BAT0/0
OTHER0/13
PHI
DAL
Off the rush
1 G on 20 · 1.85 xG
4 G on 32 · 2.94 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 1 · 0.19 xG
0 G on 5 · 0.90 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: PHI went 0-for-18, DAL 0-for-20. DAL scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Robertson
#21 · L · DAL
3 G · 0 A · 6 SOG · 16:44 TOI · +2
R. Hintz
#24 · C · DAL
0 G · 3 A · 3 SOG · 14:35 TOI · +2
T. Seguin
#91 · C · DAL
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 15:16 TOI · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • PHI generated higher-quality looks than the shot total suggests.
  • J. Oettinger (DAL) stopped 1.2 goals above expected.
  • DAL generated far more dangerous chances — 0.072 xG/shot vs 0.049. Quality over quantity.
  • DAL was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 32 rush chances.
  • DAL created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · PHI at DAL · 8:00 PM ET

Flyers at Stars: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 4:41 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

52%
DAL
Model favorite
48%
52%
PHI50DAL

DAL by 4 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score PHI 2.32.4 DAL; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

PHI← edge
edge →DAL
51.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
48.0%Corsi%47.0%
2.26xGF / 602.36
2.20xGA / 602.29
1.96Goals for / gm2.07
1.82Goals against / gm1.68
1.008PDO — luck, not skill1.024

DAL holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.008 vs 1.024) says DAL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The models can't decide, and they're right not to. Dallas projects as a 52% favorite in a game the numbers expect to land 2.3 to 2.4 goals either way—which is to say: almost a coin flip.

The Stars' form looks sharper. They're 7-1-2 over their last ten, which buys credibility. But the underlying numbers reveal no such advantage. Both teams sit at 51.0% expected goals share at five-on-five, a sign that neither has truly separated. Philadelphia's Corsi% (48.0%) trails Dallas slightly (47.0%), but the difference is noise, not a structural advantage.

Where the gap opens is efficiency, not play. Dallas's PDO of 1.024 against Philadelphia's 1.008 means the Stars are running hotter—converting chances at a higher rate than their underlying process would predict. Regression is coming for Dallas.

C. DeSmith's status clouds the matchup. He's on a back-to-back, which could mean either a backup start or a starter running on fumes. Either way, it changes the shape of the game.

The player matchups favor neither team by much. Owen Tippett (19 goals, 0.88 xG/60) and Christian Dvorak (12 goals, 0.81 xG/60) lead Philadelphia's charge; Tippett's 2 high-danger goals and 12.1% shooting mark him as the sharper scorer. For Dallas, Jason Robertson (25 goals, 0.96 xG/60) and Michael Bunting (8 goals, 7.6% shooting) form the nucleus. Robertson owns 2 high-danger goals and a higher xG rate than any Flyer, making him the most dangerous individual on the ice.

Dvorak's role compounds Philadelphia's problem: he's both their second-leading scorer and a defensive weak point, forcing them to accept risk for secondary scoring. Tyler Myers plays that same knife-edge for Dallas, making possession-dependent hockey a hazard for both sides.

The game hinges on regime: either the Stars' efficiency continues, or Philadelphia's underlying play breaks through the variance. The models split the difference because neither outcome is unlikely. Dallas's recent heat matters, but only slightly—the 52% win probability is honest.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
DAL
Jason Robertson25G 21A
0.96 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.4% sh
Michael Bunting8G 14A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 7.6% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters