Backcheck
Recap · NYI at DAL

Islanders hold off the Stars

The Islanders stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.39–3.02 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 11, 4:35 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NYI
New York Islanders
3
Home
DAL
Dallas Stars
2
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.39Expected goals3.02
56% share for the better side
22Shot attempts (SOG)24
5High-danger chances4
39Corsi (all attempts)57
Score-adjusted: 39% / 61%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Dallas dominated the play but lost 3–2 to New York — a 56–44% expected-goals theft. The Stars generated more high-danger chances (5 to NYI's 4), yet D. Rittich's goaltending (+1.02 vs expected) and New York's clinical finish flipped the result.

Rittich's 0.917 save percentage was the difference-maker, backstopping an Islanders team that capitalized on its opportunities. J. Oettinger (0.864 SV%, –0.61 vs expected) couldn't keep pace with Rittich's form, a goaltending gap that decided the night.

NYI's efficiency was surgical. They converted 2 of 5 high-danger chances (40%) and scored 3 goals off just 17 rush opportunities, turning transition speed into their most lethal weapon. When Dallas generated 5 rebound chances but converted zero second looks, the margin was decided.

Jason Robertson scored 2 goals, including a backhander (18:01, P3), but Dallas couldn't close out a night it controlled.


Final: NYI 3 – DAL 2

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYI2 / 5 · 1.17 xG
DAL0 / 4 · 0.90 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYI0 / 6 · 0.68 xG
DAL2 / 12 · 1.56 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYI1 / 28 · 0.54 xG
DAL0 / 41 · 0.56 xG

DAL went 0-for-4 from high danger on 0.90 expected goals — 0.9 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYI
3 G · 2.39 xG · +0.6
DAL
2 G · 3.02 xG · -1.0
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
D. RittichNYI
+1.0
J. OettingerDAL
-0.6

NYI finished +0.6 against expected, DAL -1.0 — D. Rittich (NYI) saved 1.0 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYI
SNAP1/22
SLAP1/5
WRIST1/4
TIP IN0/1
BACKHAND0/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/6
DAL
SNAP1/18
SLAP0/4
WRIST0/5
TIP IN0/6
BACKHAND1/3
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/20
NYI
DAL
Off the rush
3 G on 17 · 1.19 xG
1 G on 23 · 2.21 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 5 · 0.82 xG
0 G on 1 · 0.12 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: NYI went 1-for-22, DAL 1-for-18. NYI scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Robertson
#21 · L · DAL
2 G · 0 A · 5 SOG · 22:59 TOI · +1
K. Palmieri
#21 · C · NYI
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 20:02 TOI · +1
T. Seguin
#91 · C · DAL
0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 17:21 TOI · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • NYI stole this one. DAL owned 56% of the xG and lost.
  • D. Rittich (NYI) stopped 1.0 goals above expected.
  • NYI was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/5 on HD chances (40%).
  • NYI was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 17 rush chances.
  • NYI created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NYI at DAL · 8:00 PM ET

Islanders at Stars: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 4:32 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

55%
DAL
Model favorite
45%
55%
NYI50DAL

DAL by 10 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYI 2.42.7 DAL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NYI← edge
edge →DAL
48.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
49.0%Corsi%47.0%
2.48xGF / 602.36
2.69xGA / 602.29
1.78Goals for / gm2.07
1.94Goals against / gm1.68
0.993PDO — luck, not skill1.024

DAL holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.993 vs 1.024) says DAL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

This is about as close to a pick'em as hockey gets. The model projects a 2.4-2.7 expected goal range with Dallas at 55% win probability.

Dallas owns the underlying play by expected goals: 51.0% xG compared to New York's 48.0%. But the Islanders claim the possession edge with 49.0% Corsi% versus Dallas's 47.0%—a reminder that shot volume and shot quality don't always align. The Stars are generating better chances despite fewer touches.

The red flag for Dallas is sustainability. Their PDO sits at 1.024, well above the league mean, suggesting some regression is coming. When a team's luck breaks—when bounces stop going their way and goaltenders stop stealing games—that 55% projection evaporates fast. The Islanders, meanwhile, are running a 0.993 PDO, closer to neutral.

I. Sorokin enters on the second leg of a back-to-back, which either means a tired starter or a backup getting the net. Either way, it's a wrinkle.

At even strength, both teams generated 0% of their goals from high-danger situations and 0% on rebounds—a statistical oddity that suggests depth scoring or defensive execution has been unusually clean. That can't last, and whoever corrects first wins the game.

The Stars lean on Jason Robertson, who has 25 goals and 21 assists while maintaining a 0.96 xG per 60 minutes at 5v5. At 12.4% shooting, he's converting at a rate that's elevated but not unsustainable. Michael Bunting (0.83 xG/60, 8 goals) gives Dallas a secondary scoring layer with an impressive 7.6% shooting rate.

For New York, Anders Lee remains the catalyst: 1.20 xG per 60, 9 goals, 20 assists, and 2 high-danger goals despite a modest 6.4% shooting rate—meaning he's still leaving points on the board. Bo Horvat (0.87 xG/60, 18 goals, 12.8% shooting) is running hotter, with 3 high-danger goals already, and is the Islanders' most dangerous bet to cash in first.

Alexander Romanov is New York's defensive weak link. Tyler Myers is Dallas's. Whichever side exploits first wins.

The model is right. This is a coin flip with the coin still spinning.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
DAL
Jason Robertson25G 21A
0.96 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.4% sh
Michael Bunting8G 14A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 7.6% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters