Blackhawks pull away from the Flames
The Blackhawks earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
The Blackhawks dominated the Flames 5-2, yet expected goals finished 2.57–2.34—a far tighter contest than the scoreboard suggested.
This wasn't dominance by underlying metrics. Chicago held 52% of shot attempts (23–21 on goal) and 52% of expected goals. They outshot Calgary marginally. But Chicago finished ruthlessly, converting at an elite rate. D. Wolf struggled in net, posting a 0.818 save percentage—1.4 goals worse than expected.
A. Soderblom stopped 19 of 21 for a 0.905 mark. Chicago's rush finishing was devastating: four goals on 23 attempts versus Calgary's two on 19.
Connor Bedard scored three goals in 20:01, driving the Chicago attack. R. Andersson answered for Calgary with a goal and assist, while O. Moore added a goal and assist for Chicago. Bedard's individual output proved decisive.
The underlying possession and shot metrics favored Chicago modestly. What separated the teams was finishing. Chicago overperformed their expected goals by 2.43, a substantial margin driven by clinical execution. Calgary, despite generating more high-danger opportunities (three to two), couldn't convert.
The danger ladder
CHI went 4-for-11 from medium danger on 1.20 expected goals — 2.8 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
CGY finished -0.3 against expected, CHI +2.4 — D. Wolf (CGY) allowed 1.4 more goals than expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: CGY went 2-for-24, CHI 2-for-20. CHI scored 4 of theirs off the rush.
- D. Wolf (CGY) gave up 1.4 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
- CHI was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 23 rush chances.
- CGY was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 19 rush chances.
- CHI outperformed their expected goals by 2.4 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.