Backcheck
Recap · UTA at SJS

Sharks steal one from the Mammoth against the run of play

The Sharks stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.25–2.09 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 11, 4:48 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
UTA
Utah Mammoth
2
Home
SJS
San Jose Sharks
3
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.25Expected goals2.09
61% share for the better side
26Shot attempts (SOG)22
7High-danger chances2
58Corsi (all attempts)41
Score-adjusted: 65% / 35%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Sharks won a game they had no business winning. San Jose edged Utah 3–2 in overtime despite the Mammoth generating 3.25 expected goals to their 2.09—a 61–39 split at 5v5 that should have favored the home team. Goaltending theft and surgical finishing made the difference.

Utah controlled play by every measure: 26 shot attempts to San Jose's 22, seven high-danger chances to two. The Sharks converted two goals from low-danger areas. They were lethal on the rush, scoring three goals on 13 chances. Utah scored twice on 25 rush attempts—a stark efficiency gap.

Y. Askarov stopped 1.25 goals above expected. Utah couldn't convert on any of its seven high-danger opportunities, a drought unlikely to repeat. The Sharks' goaltending and their ability to exploit mistakes compensated for being thoroughly outplayed in both volume and quality of chances.

Macklin Celebrini finished the game at 02:52 of overtime with a wrist shot from the circles. He recorded three goals in 19:41, a burst that exemplified San Jose's night: every shot counted.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
UTA0 / 7 · 1.74 xG
SJS0 / 2 · 0.49 xG
Medium dangermid-range
UTA1 / 8 · 1.03 xG
SJS1 / 11 · 1.25 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
UTA1 / 43 · 0.48 xG
SJS2 / 28 · 0.34 xG

UTA went 0-for-7 from high danger on 1.74 expected goals — 1.7 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
UTA
2 G · 3.25 xG · -1.3
SJS
3 G · 2.09 xG · +0.9
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
V. VanecekUTA
-0.9
Y. AskarovSJS
+1.3

UTA finished -1.3 against expected, SJS +0.9 — Y. Askarov (SJS) saved 1.3 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
UTA
WRIST1/18
SLAP0/7
BACKHAND0/5
TIP IN0/3
SNAP1/3
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/21
SJS
WRIST3/15
SLAP0/8
BACKHAND0/3
TIP IN0/2
SNAP0/0
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/12
UTA
SJS
Off the rush
2 G on 25 · 2.20 xG
3 G on 13 · 1.13 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 2 · 0.45 xG
0 G on 4 · 0.46 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: UTA went 1-for-18, SJS 3-for-15. SJS scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Celebrini
#71 · C · SJS
3 G · 0 A · 4 SOG · 19:41 TOI · +1
W. Smith
#2 · C · SJS
0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 17:23 TOI
J. Peterka
#77 · R · UTA
2 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 13:57 TOI · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • SJS won despite being outplayed by xG (39%). Goaltending or finishing carried them.
  • Y. Askarov (SJS) stopped 1.3 goals above expected.
  • UTA couldn't convert — 0/7 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • SJS scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • SJS was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 13 rush chances.
  • UTA was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 25 rush chances.
  • SJS created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • Y. Askarov was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 7 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · UTA at SJS · 10:00 PM ET

Mammoth at Sharks: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 4:46 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

52%
UTA
Model favorite
52%
48%
UTA50SJS

UTA by 4 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score UTA 2.62.5 SJS; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

UTA← edge
edge →SJS
52.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
53.0%Corsi%47.0%
2.64xGF / 602.33
2.39xGA / 602.56
2.26Goals for / gm1.99
1.99Goals against / gm2.32
1.003PDO — luck, not skill0.998

UTA holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.003 vs 0.998) says UTA has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

Models project a UTA 2.6-2.5 SJS game with the Mammoth at 52% win probability — essentially a pick'em. San Jose owns recent form, but Utah controls the puck; both edges feel real.

The Sharks are 6-3-1 over their last 10, the better recent record. Utah's underwater at -5 goal differential in the same span. But San Jose's hot streak has masked underlying play. Utah leads 5v5 xG% 52.0% to 48.0% and drives Corsi at 53.0%—the territorial tilt favors possession play, not results.

Utah's issue isn't play quality, it's execution. Dylan Guenther (28G 15A, 1.02 xG/60) generates chances at an elite rate but converts at 16.8%, a sustainable mark for this volume. Daniil But's 5.6% shooting (2G 2A from 1.01 xG/60) sits well below expectation and should improve eventually, but San Jose shouldn't bank on correction arriving tonight.

For San Jose, Pavol Regenda (5G 1A, 1.10 xG/60) is marked inactive—a significant hit to depth. Igor Chernyshov (6G 8A, 0.91 xG/60, 15.0% shooting) absorbs that load, though his stats suggest he's outperforming chances. That 15.0% won't persist; regression is a when, not an if.

Utah's Maveric Lamoureux (the team's defensive weak link) faces pressure from a suddenly lethal San Jose. Conversely, Chernyshov's own defensive liability—despite offensive production—gives Utah an opening. PDO favors neither team (UTA 1.003, SJS 0.998), so luck isn't explaining the result gap.

The models see what the records miss: Utah's underlying play—52.0% xG—suggests the Mammoth should be winning more. San Jose's 6-3-1 run is real, but Utah's possession edge, if converted at historical rates, flips this into an away win. That's why the projection sits so tight: Utah's depth of play justifies favorites' odds, but San Jose's momentum is recent and measurable.

This is a true flip. Take the underlying advantage or the hot streak. Either case is defensible.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

UTA
Dylan Guenther28G 15A
1.02 xG/60 · 3 HD · 16.8% sh
Daniil But2G 2A
1.01 xG/60 · 1 HD · 5.6% sh
SJS
Pavol Regenda5G 1A
1.10 xG/60 · 2 HD · 16.1% sh
Igor Chernyshov6G 8A
0.91 xG/60 · 1 HD · 15.0% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters