Blue Jackets edge the Maple Leafs in overtime
The Blue Jackets earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
Columbus's overtime victory reflected their clear superiority in underlying play. Z. Werenski orchestrated a 57% expected-goals advantage from the blue line with three assists, anchored by an 8-3 high-danger-chance edge. CBJ's shot quality exceeded Toronto's — 0.060 xG per attempt versus 0.039. They capitalized with three goals on 26 rush chances.
Toronto's shot volume (49% of attempts) masked a critical weakness: only 43% of expected goals. They generated pressure without consequence. J. Tavares scored and assisted in defeat, but Toronto never generated the dangerous chances needed to overcome their quality deficit.
Both J. Greaves and J. Woll played above their expected levels, compressing the 3.76–2.83 xG split into a single-goal margin. Elite goaltending kept the scoreline tighter than underlying play justified.
A. Fantilli scored the game-winner at 04:21 of overtime with a wrist shot from the doorstep, rewarding Columbus's dominance. Werenski's playmaking and CBJ's lethal finishing on the rush proved the decisive difference.
The danger ladder
TOR went 0-for-14 from medium danger on 1.56 expected goals — 1.6 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
CBJ finished -0.8 against expected, TOR -0.8 — J. Greaves (CBJ) saved 0.8 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: CBJ went 2-for-34, TOR 2-for-27. CBJ scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- CBJ had the higher quality looks — 0.060 xG/shot vs 0.039.
- CBJ was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 26 rush chances.
- TOR created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- CBJ created 6 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.