Backcheck
Recap · PHI at NJD

Flyers hold off the Devils

The Flyers earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 6:16 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
5
Home
NJD
New Jersey Devils
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.25Expected goals3.68
54% share for the better side
32Shot attempts (SOG)32
7High-danger chances6
48Corsi (all attempts)75
Score-adjusted: 34% / 66%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Devils generated higher expected goals (4.25 versus 3.68), yet lost 5-3. This gap represents the game's core divergence: New Jersey created the statistically superior overall chance pool, but Philadelphia's clinical finishing reversed it into a Flyers victory.

Both teams accumulated 32 shot attempts. The Flyers' edge was surgical: Philadelphia generated 0.089 xG per attempt, compared to 0.049 for New Jersey. That efficiency gap meant fewer Flyers touches carried significantly more threat.

Philadelphia converted 3 of 7 high-danger chances (43%). New Jersey registered 2 goals from low-danger spots, a sign of peripheral execution over prime scoring opportunities.

Off the rush, the Flyers scored 4 times on 28 chances; New Jersey, 2 of 28. Over identical looks, Philadelphia's execution diverged sharply.

D. Vladar recorded a 0.906 save percentage with a +0.68 overperformance above expected, typical when marginal stops compound into wins. J. Markstrom saved 27 of 31 (0.871 SV%) — the performance gap between managing routine volume and absorbing relentless offense.

The Flyers' 0.75-goal overperformance across the full game captures the margin: New Jersey's xG edge was deserved, but Philadelphia's precision in high-danger and rush scenarios proved decisive.

O. Tippett delivered 2 goals and an assist in 15:34, powering Philadelphia's attack. J. Bratt distributed 2 assists across 20:52 for New Jersey, while D. Mercer paired a goal with an assist in 18:49 — supporting production that couldn't bridge the execution gap.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
PHI3 / 7 · 1.98 xG
NJD1 / 6 · 1.26 xG
Medium dangermid-range
PHI2 / 18 · 1.92 xG
NJD0 / 12 · 1.61 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
PHI0 / 23 · 0.35 xG
NJD2 / 57 · 0.82 xG

NJD went 0-for-12 from medium danger on 1.61 expected goals — 1.6 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
PHI
5 G · 4.25 xG · +0.8
NJD
3 G · 3.68 xG · -0.7
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
D. VladarPHI
+0.7
J. MarkstromNJD
+0.3

PHI finished +0.8 against expected, NJD -0.7 — D. Vladar (PHI) saved 0.7 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
PHI
WRIST0/18
SNAP0/8
BACKHAND2/4
TIP IN0/3
SLAP1/3
DEFLECTED1/2
OTHER1/10
NJD
WRIST1/15
SNAP0/13
BACKHAND1/8
TIP IN0/7
SLAP1/5
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/26
PHI
NJD
Off the rush
4 G on 28 · 3.25 xG
2 G on 28 · 2.37 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 1 · 0.21 xG
1 G on 6 · 0.88 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: PHI went 0-for-18, NJD 1-for-15. PHI scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
O. Tippett
#74 · R · PHI
2 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 15:34 TOI · +2
J. Bratt
#63 · L · NJD
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 20:52 TOI · -2
D. Mercer
#91 · C · NJD
1 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 18:49 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • PHI had the higher quality looks — 0.089 xG/shot vs 0.049.
  • PHI was clinical in the high-danger zone — 3/7 on HD chances (43%).
  • NJD scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • NJD was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 28 rush chances.
  • PHI was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 28 rush chances.
  • NJD created 6 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · PHI at NJD · 7:00 PM ET

Flyers at Devils: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 6:15 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
NJD
Model favorite
49%
51%
PHI50NJD

NJD by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score PHI 2.42.5 NJD; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

PHI← edge
edge →NJD
51.0%5v5 xG%50.0%
48.0%Corsi%51.0%
2.26xGF / 602.45
2.20xGA / 602.50
1.96Goals for / gm1.66
1.82Goals against / gm2.23
1.008PDO — luck, not skill0.971

PHI holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.008 vs 0.971) says PHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.4–2.5 goal game with the Devils favored at 51% win probability. This is a pick'em.

Jersey's advantage is territorial. The Devils lead a 51.0% Corsi% against Philadelphia's 48.0%, meaning sustained offensive pressure. Philadelphia counters with marginally superior shot quality—51.0% expected goals versus 50.0%—but the margin offers no decisive edge.

The Devils run cold at 0.971 PDO, unsustained luck due for positive regression. Philadelphia sits at 1.008, tracking their underlying play. A swing in either direction reshapes the contest.

Both teams start their goaltenders on back-to-backs: J. Allen for New Jersey and S. Ersson for Philadelphia. Fatigue is a real variable. The team managing transitions better controls momentum.

Offensively, Philadelphia leans on Owen Tippett (19 goals, 0.88 expected goals per 60 minutes, 2 high-danger goals) and Christian Dvorak (12 goals, 0.81 xG/60, 3 high-danger goals, 11.2% shooting). Tippett finishes crisply. Dvorak's 21 assists mark him as an efficient distributor.

New Jersey counters with Timo Meier (13 goals, 1.08 xG/60, 3 high-danger goals, 6.7% shooting) and Jack Hughes (18 goals, 0.88 xG/60, 1 high-danger goal, 11.5% shooting). Meier's low shooting percentage relative to volume suggests room for improvement. Hughes runs high in shot and assist volume.

With both teams finishing at league average from high-danger areas and neither defense a weakness, the deciding factor is which team sustains territorial advantage without losing transition focus. The pick'em odds stand.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
NJD
Timo Meier13G 15A
1.08 xG/60 · 3 HD · 6.7% sh
Jack Hughes18G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.5% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters