Backcheck
Recap · CBJ at NJD

Blue Jackets hold off the Devils

The Blue Jackets stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.51–4.20 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 11, 6:32 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
CBJ
Columbus Blue Jackets
5
Home
NJD
New Jersey Devils
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.51Expected goals4.20
55% share for the better side
25Shot attempts (SOG)33
5High-danger chances6
43Corsi (all attempts)65
Score-adjusted: 39% / 61%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Blue Jackets beat the Devils 5–3, but the underlying numbers said the Devils deserved better. New Jersey held 57% of shot attempts (33–25) and led expected goals 4.20–3.51, yet left with nothing.

The gap was purely goaltending. E. Merzlikins stopped 30 of 33 shots and beat his xG model by 1.20 goals; J. Allen faced just 25 shots but gave up 1.49 more than expected, a split that swung nearly three goals in Columbus's favor.

The Devils were lethal in transition, scoring 3 times on 31 rush chances. The Blue Jackets matched them, scoring 4 times on just 21 rush attempts—an efficiency advantage that turned the tide. New Jersey's power play was dominant (2 goals on 23 shots, 1.48 xG), but it could not overcome the even-strength margin.

C. Coyle (1–2 in 20:27) and Z. Werenski (2 assists in 26:57) led Columbus's offense. Miles Wood's wrist shot from the high slot in period three (13:31) marked the turning point. N. Hischier (1–1 in 23:51) led New Jersey's charge.

This was a game where shot quality mattered less than shot conversion. The Devils created the better chances; the Blue Jackets simply scored more of theirs.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CBJ1 / 5 · 1.90 xG
NJD2 / 6 · 1.40 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CBJ4 / 10 · 1.23 xG
NJD0 / 15 · 1.81 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CBJ0 / 28 · 0.38 xG
NJD1 / 44 · 0.98 xG

CBJ went 4-for-10 from medium danger on 1.23 expected goals — 2.8 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CBJ
5 G · 3.51 xG · +1.5
NJD
3 G · 4.20 xG · -1.2
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
E. MerzlikinsCBJ
+1.2
J. AllenNJD
-1.5

CBJ finished +1.5 against expected, NJD -1.2 — J. Allen (NJD) allowed 1.5 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CBJ
WRIST2/19
SNAP1/5
BACKHAND1/3
SLAP0/2
TIP IN1/3
DEFLECTED0/0
POKE0/0
OTHER0/11
NJD
WRIST2/18
SNAP1/8
BACKHAND0/8
SLAP0/8
TIP IN0/7
DEFLECTED0/2
POKE0/1
OTHER0/13
CBJ
NJD
Off the rush
4 G on 21 · 2.14 xG
3 G on 31 · 2.60 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 2 · 0.38 xG
0 G on 5 · 0.81 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: CBJ went 2-for-19, NJD 2-for-18. CBJ scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
C. Coyle
#3 · C · CBJ
1 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 20:27 TOI · +2
Z. Werenski
#8 · D · CBJ
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 26:57 TOI · +3
N. Hischier
#13 · C · NJD
1 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 23:51 TOI · -2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • E. Merzlikins (CBJ) stopped 1.2 goals above expected.
  • J. Allen (NJD) gave up 1.5 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • NJD was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 31 rush chances.
  • CBJ was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 21 rush chances.
  • NJD created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NJD power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 23 PP shots (1.48 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · CBJ at NJD · 7:00 PM ET

Blue Jackets at Devils: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 6:23 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

50%
NJD
Model favorite
50%
50%
CBJ50NJD

NJD by 0 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score CBJ 2.62.6 NJD; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

CBJ← edge
edge →NJD
52.0%5v5 xG%50.0%
51.0%Corsi%51.0%
2.63xGF / 602.45
2.43xGA / 602.50
2.12Goals for / gm1.66
1.98Goals against / gm2.23
1.003PDO — luck, not skill0.971

CBJ holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.003 vs 0.971) says CBJ has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

This is as close to a pick'em as the models get: 2.6 goals for Columbus, 2.6 for New Jersey, win probability split at 50-50.

The underlying shot metrics favor Columbus ever so slightly. The Blue Jackets hold a 52.0% expected goals share at 5v5, a full two percentage points above the Devils' 50.0%. Their Corsi rates match at 51.0% each. But that edge masks a deeper mismatch: Columbus is punching above its xG with a 1.003 PDO, while New Jersey is running cold at 0.971. The Devils are due for positive regression.

Columbus's recent form complicates the picture. Over their last 10 games, the Blue Jackets sit at minus-7 in goal differential. That's a significant drag on a team that, by underlying metrics, should be competitive here.

The goaltending question is worth watching. J. Markstrom is on a back-to-back and could either see a backup start or take the ice fatigued—either way, advantage unclear.

Columbus's offensive load falls on Boone Jenner (11 goals, 0.98 xG per 60 minutes, 9.6% shooting rate) and Mathieu Olivier (12 goals, 0.89 xG per 60, 13.3% shooting). Olivier's finishing rate is a red flag for reversion; Jenner's volume carries more stability. New Jersey counters with Timo Meier (13 goals, 1.08 xG per 60, 6.7% shooting) and Jack Hughes (18 goals, 0.88 xG per 60, 11.5% shooting). Hughes has paced the offense despite a lower expected output—unsustainable production from a blue-chip player.

Both teams generate heavy chances in uncommon ways. Columbus posts 0% of its scoring from high-danger plays and 0% from rebounds. The Devils mirror that: 0% high-danger, 0% rebound. Those zeros hide the real vulnerabilities. Conor Garland is Columbus's defensive weak link; Johnathan Kovacevic carries that burden for New Jersey.

The edge goes to New Jersey if regression arrives tonight. Until then, treat this like the toss-up it is.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

CBJ
Boone Jenner11G 21A
0.98 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.6% sh
Mathieu Olivier12G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.3% sh
NJD
Timo Meier13G 15A
1.08 xG/60 · 3 HD · 6.7% sh
Jack Hughes18G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.5% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters