Backcheck
Recap · TBL at MTL

J. Johansson stands tall as the Lightning edge the Canadiens

The Lightning stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.57–4.02 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 11, 7:38 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
TBL
Tampa Bay Lightning
6
Home
MTL
Montreal Canadiens
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.57Expected goals4.02
53% share for the better side
27Shot attempts (SOG)27
7High-danger chances7
62Corsi (all attempts)60
Score-adjusted: 44% / 56%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Lightning's 6-1 victory over Montreal masks a much tighter game beneath the surface. Expected goals split 4.02–3.57 in the Canadiens' favor, yet Tampa Bay ran away with it—a five-goal swing that tells a story of elite goaltending and Montreal's offensive collapse.

The Canadiens held 50% of shot attempts (27–27 on goal) and created the better quality chances. High-danger chances tied at 7–7. Yet they scored once. That's because J. Johansson saved 3.02 goals above expected—the difference between a close contest and a blowout.

Montreal's net-minders couldn't keep pace. S. Montembeault (0.769 SV%) underperformed expectations by 1.28 goals. His replacement, J. Dobes (0.786 SV%), fell 1.15 short. Where Montreal wasted quality chances, Tampa exploited the margins. On the rush, they scored 4 goals on 20 chances. Off the rush, Montreal crashed the net for 5 rebound opportunities and converted one; Tampa created 6 and converted none.

Darren Raddysh's snap shot from the point at 8:41 of the third period marked the moment Tampa's edge shifted from marginal to decisive.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
TBL2 / 7 · 1.58 xG
MTL1 / 7 · 2.14 xG
Medium dangermid-range
TBL3 / 12 · 1.43 xG
MTL0 / 14 · 1.40 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
TBL1 / 43 · 0.56 xG
MTL0 / 39 · 0.48 xG

TBL went 3-for-12 from medium danger on 1.43 expected goals — 1.6 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
TBL
6 G · 3.57 xG · +2.4
MTL
1 G · 4.02 xG · -3.0
01234567
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. JohanssonTBL
+3.0
S. MontembeaultMTL
-1.3
J. DobesMTL
-1.1

TBL finished +2.4 against expected, MTL -3.0 — J. Johansson (TBL) saved 3.0 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
TBL
SNAP5/28
BACKHAND0/4
WRIST0/3
SLAP1/2
TIP IN0/2
DEFLECTED0/1
BAT0/0
OTHER0/22
MTL
SNAP0/32
BACKHAND0/4
WRIST0/2
SLAP0/2
TIP IN0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
BAT1/1
OTHER0/18
TBL
MTL
Off the rush
4 G on 20 · 2.05 xG
0 G on 23 · 2.40 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 6 · 0.95 xG
1 G on 5 · 1.03 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: TBL went 5-for-28, MTL 0-for-32. TBL scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
D. Raddysh
#43 · D · TBL
2 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 24:26 TOI · +3
B. Point
#21 · C · TBL
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 17:44 TOI · +2
N. Kucherov
#86 · R · TBL
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 17:43 TOI · +3
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • J. Johansson (TBL) stopped 3.0 goals above expected.
  • S. Montembeault (MTL) gave up 1.3 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • TBL was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 20 rush chances.
  • MTL created 5 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • TBL created 6 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • MTL underperformed xG by 3.0 — wasted quality chances.
  • TBL outperformed their expected goals by 2.4 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
  • J. Johansson (TBL) saved 3.0 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · TBL at MTL · 7:00 PM ET

Lightning at Canadiens: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 7:34 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

53%
TBL
Model favorite
53%
47%
TBL50MTL

TBL by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score TBL 2.62.5 MTL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

TBL← edge
edge →MTL
54.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
53.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.67xGF / 602.41
2.28xGA / 602.62
2.38Goals for / gm2.24
1.85Goals against / gm1.96
1.019PDO — luck, not skill1.018

TBL holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.019 vs 1.018) says TBL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The numbers are deadlocked. A Moneyuck model projects Tampa Bay 2.6 to Montreal 2.5, with the Lightning favored at 53%—close enough to flip a coin.

The Lightning's edge lives in possession. They command 54.0% of expected goals at 5-on-5 and drive play with a 53.0% Corsi advantage. The Canadiens sit at 48.0% xG and 49.0% Corsi, a passive posture by comparison.

Yet both are running hot, and that invites risk. Tampa Bay's 1.019 PDO and Montreal's 1.018 PDO signal regression—they're beating their underlying play, and the law of averages rarely makes exceptions.

The Lightning's scoring concentrates around two shooters. Brandon Hagel leads with 1.10 xG per 60 minutes, 23 goals, and 26 assists; his 2 high-danger goals and 15.8% shooting rate mark him as efficient rather than prolific. Anthony Cirelli follows at 0.95 xG/60 with 15 goals and 18 assists, backed by 17.0% shooting and 5 high-danger goals.

Montreal counters with Cole Caufield, who posted 0.97 xG/60, 33 goals, and 16 assists. His 20.0% shooting rate towers above the league average, a clear regression signal. Oliver Kapanen chips in 0.83 xG/60 with 19 goals and 12 assists, 17.8% shooting, and 4 high-danger goals.

The defensive matchups break even. Victor Hedman anchors Tampa's blue line but grades as the team's weak link. Mike Matheson does the same for Montreal.

Territory decides tight games. Tampa's play-driving edge should manufacture incremental chances over 60 minutes. But Montreal's shooting rates—especially Caufield's—leave room for a hot night.

This is close because it is close. Take the coin flip.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

TBL
Brandon Hagel23G 26A
1.10 xG/60 · 2 HD · 15.8% sh
Anthony Cirelli15G 18A
0.95 xG/60 · 5 HD · 17.0% sh
MTL
Cole Caufield33G 16A
0.97 xG/60 · 1 HD · 20.0% sh
Oliver Kapanen19G 12A
0.83 xG/60 · 4 HD · 17.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters