Flyers run the Sharks off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Flyers earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
The 4-1 Flyers win understated the dominance: Philadelphia controlled 66% of 5v5 expected goals, a gap so vast that the scoreline felt generous to San Jose. The Sharks didn't just lose the possession battle—they underperformed their own already-poor metrics by 0.95 goals, suggesting even their limited chances didn't materialize.
Philadelphia's control was total. They held 62% of shot attempts (30–18 on goal), edged high-danger chances 7–2, and converted the rush with terrifying efficiency—3 goals on just 21 chances. D. Vladar, the Flyers' goaltender, made 17 saves on 18 shots, beating his expected performance by 0.95 goals.
The goaltending split told a story. A. Nedeljkovic stopped 26 of 29 for San Jose, a 0.897 save percentage that exceeded his expected mark by 0.72 goals—respectable work against a relentless opponent. But it couldn't matter. The Sharks created little, and what little they did create didn't find the net.
Travis Konecny's wrist shot from the wing (P3, 18:17) was the turning point—a moment that codified what the numbers had been saying all night: San Jose had no answer.
The Three Stars:
- C. Dvorak (PHI) — 1G, 1A in 19:01
- T. Konecny (PHI) — 1G, 1A in 17:26
- J. Drysdale (PHI) — 1A in 23:15
The danger ladder
PHI went 1-for-7 from high danger on 1.70 expected goals — 0.7 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
SJS finished -0.9 against expected, PHI +0.3 — D. Vladar (PHI) saved 0.9 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: SJS went 0-for-15, PHI 2-for-20. PHI scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- PHI was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 21 rush chances.
- PHI created 7 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.