Panthers hold off the Kings
The Panthers stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 4.08–3.16 and won anyway.
The underlying story
Los Angeles dominated by expected goals—56% to 44%—and still lost. The Kings generated 4.08 xG to Florida's 3.16, controlled high-danger chances 7–4, and were stalled by elite goaltending and their own terrible execution.
D. Tarasov's performance accounted for the entire difference. He made 27 saves on 29 shots (0.931 SV%), saving 2.08 goals above expected and stopping 100% of the seven high-danger chances he faced. A. Forsberg, meanwhile, faced easier volume (26 saves on 29 shots, 0.897 SV%), and the gap in quality—rather than volume—tilted the game.
The Kings couldn't convert what they created. Zero goals on seven high-danger chances is not a repeatable result, but it defined this one. They crashed the offensive zone effectively (5 rebound opportunities) and generated from everywhere. Rush chances split evenly—both teams scored twice on roughly 23 attempts—meaning the advantage was elsewhere. The Kings' dominance came from sustained pressure and positioning. None of it mattered against a goaltender playing a theft.
The Panthers' path was simpler: survive, execute in brief windows, and let goaltending do the heavy lifting. B. Marchand assisted twice, A. Ekblad added a helper, and S. Bennett scored. On the whole, Florida was outplayed but held serve, a result that hinges entirely on one goaltender's margin.
The danger ladder
LAK went 0-for-7 from high danger on 1.87 expected goals — 1.9 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
LAK finished -2.1 against expected, FLA -0.2 — D. Tarasov (FLA) saved 2.1 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Snap shots carried the volume: LAK went 0-for-12, FLA 0-for-24. LAK scored 2 of theirs off the rush.
- FLA won despite being outplayed by xG (44%). Goaltending or finishing carried them.
- D. Tarasov (FLA) stopped 2.1 goals above expected.
- LAK couldn't convert — 0/7 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
- FLA was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 23 rush chances.
- LAK was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 22 rush chances.
- LAK created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- LAK underperformed xG by 2.1 — wasted quality chances.
- D. Tarasov (FLA) saved 2.1 goals above expected — stole the show.
- D. Tarasov was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 7 high-danger shots.