Backcheck
Recap · LAK at TBL

Kings steal one from the Lightning against the run of play

The Kings stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.13–4.39 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 11, 8:53 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
LAK
Los Angeles Kings
2
Home
TBL
Tampa Bay Lightning
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.13Expected goals4.39
67% share for the better side
20Shot attempts (SOG)32
4High-danger chances8
33Corsi (all attempts)77
Score-adjusted: 29% / 71%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Kings won 2-1 against a Lightning team that dominated play. Los Angeles won the scoreboard 2-1 while losing the expected goals battle 4.39–2.13—a heist against the run of play.

This was a goaltending game. A. Forsberg (LAK) stopped 31 of 32, posting a 0.969 save percentage and gaining 3.39 goals on his expected output. A. Vasilevskiy (TBL) made 18 of 20 saves at 0.900. The Lightning created the better chances—they owned 67% of expected goals and won the high-danger count 8–4—but Forsberg turned away what should have been goals.

The Lightning controlled territory. They took 62% of shot attempts and generated 5 rebound chances, crashing the net effectively. The Kings managed 3 rebound chances and converted none. Yet LA was lethal on the rush, scoring twice on 13 rush attempts. One arrived early enough to set the tone: Adrian Kempe's backhander from the doorstep at 15:58 of the second period. That goal, combined with Forsberg's performance, was the difference.

The Lightning underperformed their xG by 3.39 goals—they created consistently but couldn't bury looks. They had the game's best play and left it at the rink.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
LAK1 / 4 · 0.93 xG
TBL1 / 8 · 1.93 xG
Medium dangermid-range
LAK0 / 7 · 0.90 xG
TBL0 / 16 · 1.69 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
LAK1 / 22 · 0.29 xG
TBL0 / 53 · 0.76 xG

TBL went 0-for-16 from medium danger on 1.69 expected goals — 1.7 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
LAK
2 G · 2.13 xG · -0.1
TBL
1 G · 4.39 xG · -3.4
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
A. ForsbergLAK
+3.4
A. VasilevskiyTBL
+0.1

LAK finished -0.1 against expected, TBL -3.4 — A. Forsberg (LAK) saved 3.4 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
LAK
WRIST1/13
SNAP0/6
TIP IN0/1
SLAP0/2
BACKHAND1/4
OTHER0/7
TBL
WRIST1/19
SNAP0/10
TIP IN0/13
SLAP0/9
BACKHAND0/4
OTHER0/22
LAK
TBL
Off the rush
2 G on 13 · 1.44 xG
0 G on 32 · 2.90 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.50 xG
1 G on 5 · 0.84 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: LAK went 1-for-13, TBL 1-for-19. LAK scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
A. Kempe
#9 · R · LAK
2 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 15:41 TOI · +2
J. Guentzel
#59 · C · TBL
0 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 26:45 TOI
O. Bjorkstrand
#22 · R · TBL
1 G · 0 A · 5 SOG · 20:54 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • LAK stole this one. TBL owned 67% of the xG and lost.
  • A. Forsberg (LAK) stopped 3.4 goals above expected.
  • LAK was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 13 rush chances.
  • TBL created 5 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • LAK created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • TBL underperformed xG by 3.4 — wasted quality chances.
  • A. Forsberg (LAK) saved 3.4 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · LAK at TBL · 7:00 PM ET

Kings at Lightning: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 8:52 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

54%
TBL
Model favorite
46%
54%
LAK50TBL

TBL by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score LAK 2.42.6 TBL; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

LAK← edge
edge →TBL
52.0%5v5 xG%54.0%
52.0%Corsi%53.0%
2.42xGF / 602.67
2.20xGA / 602.28
1.85Goals for / gm2.38
1.71Goals against / gm1.85
1.002PDO — luck, not skill1.019

TBL holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.002 vs 1.019) says TBL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

This is as close to a pick'em as you'll find. The model projects a 2.4–2.6 goal spread with Tampa Bay at 54% win probability—statistical noise masquerading as genuine separation.

Los Angeles and Tampa are separated by a hair in five-on-five play. The Kings generate 52.0% expected goals and 52.0% Corsi rates; the Lightning produce 54.0% xG% and 53.0% Corsi%. Tampa's marginal edge comes tethered to an unsustainable finish rate. Their 1.019 PDO will regress. Los Angeles, at 1.002, sits closer to baseline, meaning their true performance is probably slightly worse but more durable.

Brandon Hagel powers Tampa's offense. He averages 1.10 xG per 60 and has posted 23 goals and 26 assists, including two high-danger goals at a 15.8% shooting clip. Anthony Cirelli multiplies the problem: 0.95 xG/60, 15 goals, 18 assists, five high-danger goals, and a 17.0% shooting rate. Los Angeles counters with Alex Laferriere, who generates 0.87 xG per 60, has 16 goals and 18 assists, and converted two high-danger chances at a 9.9% clip. Jared Wright operates deeper in the roster—0.83 xG/60, zero goals, four assists—but maintains predictable offense.

Both teams have converted zero percent of high-danger and rebound situations into goals this season, a deficit that caps upside. Tampa's PDO bakes in finish-rate luck that will reverse; Los Angeles hasn't caught that fever. The regression, if it arrives during this matchup, decides the game.

Defensively, the weak links run opposite directions. Adrian Kempe represents Los Angeles's liability; Victor Hedman carries Tampa's defensive burden. In a game this tight, those vulnerabilities become the deciding edges.

Three Stars

  • Brandon Hagel (Tampa Bay)
  • Alex Laferriere (Los Angeles)
  • Anthony Cirelli (Tampa Bay)
Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

LAK
Alex Laferriere16G 18A
0.87 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.9% sh
Jared Wright0G 4A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
TBL
Brandon Hagel23G 26A
1.10 xG/60 · 2 HD · 15.8% sh
Anthony Cirelli15G 18A
0.95 xG/60 · 5 HD · 17.0% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters