Backcheck
Recap · VAN at NYI

Canucks pull away from the Islanders

The Canucks won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 11, 9:03 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
VAN
Vancouver Canucks
4
Home
NYI
New York Islanders
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.26Expected goals3.10
51% share for the better side
31Shot attempts (SOG)24
3High-danger chances5
54Corsi (all attempts)53
Score-adjusted: 44% / 56%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

T. Demko was the difference. The Canucks won 4-1, but expected goals were nearly even at 3.26–3.10 (a 51–49 split), suggesting a one-goal game. Demko saved 2.10 goals above expected—nearly the entire margin.

The Islanders held their own. They took 44% of shot attempts (24–31 on goal), generated five high-danger chances against the Canucks' three, and crashed the net for four rebound opportunities. I. Sorokin made 27 saves on 30 shots (0.900 SV%), a capable outing that ran into something elite.

The Canucks' execution widened the gap. They scored three goals on 24 rush chances—clinical transition hockey. K. Sherwood scored 3 in 15:13, the shortest ice time among the Three Stars; F. Hronek added 2 assists in 24:11; M. Pettersson recorded 1 assist in 25:21. The Islanders had their chances. T. Demko turned them away.

The models said close. The scoreboard said runaway.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
VAN1 / 3 · 1.03 xG
NYI1 / 5 · 1.17 xG
Medium dangermid-range
VAN2 / 16 · 1.80 xG
NYI0 / 14 · 1.40 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
VAN1 / 35 · 0.44 xG
NYI0 / 34 · 0.53 xG

NYI went 0-for-14 from medium danger on 1.40 expected goals — 1.4 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
VAN
4 G · 3.26 xG · +0.7
NYI
1 G · 3.10 xG · -2.1
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
T. DemkoVAN
+2.1
I. SorokinNYI
+0.3

VAN finished +0.7 against expected, NYI -2.1 — T. Demko (VAN) saved 2.1 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
VAN
WRIST3/24
SNAP1/5
SLAP0/3
DEFLECTED0/2
BACKHAND0/4
TIP IN0/1
BAT0/1
OTHER0/14
NYI
WRIST1/15
SNAP0/7
SLAP0/8
DEFLECTED0/5
BACKHAND0/2
TIP IN0/1
BAT0/0
OTHER0/15
VAN
NYI
Off the rush
3 G on 24 · 1.51 xG
1 G on 24 · 2.31 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 6 · 0.84 xG
0 G on 4 · 0.40 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: VAN went 3-for-24, NYI 1-for-15. VAN scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
K. Sherwood
#44 · L · VAN
3 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 15:13 TOI · +2
F. Hronek
#17 · D · VAN
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 24:11 TOI · +1
M. Pettersson
#29 · D · VAN
0 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 25:21 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • T. Demko (VAN) stopped 2.1 goals above expected.
  • VAN was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 24 rush chances.
  • NYI created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • VAN created 6 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NYI underperformed xG by 2.1 — wasted quality chances.
  • T. Demko (VAN) saved 2.1 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · VAN at NYI · 7:00 PM ET

The Islanders are the model's lean over the Canucks — with PDO regression in play

By the ModelJul 11, 9:00 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

55%
NYI
Model favorite
45%
55%
VAN50NYI

NYI by 10 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score VAN 2.52.8 NYI; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

VAN← edge
edge →NYI
44.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
46.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.22xGF / 602.48
2.81xGA / 602.69
1.60Goals for / gm1.78
2.56Goals against / gm1.94
0.974PDO — luck, not skill0.993

NYI holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.974 vs 0.993) says NYI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model sees Islanders over Canucks as a 55% proposition in a game it projects at 2.5-2.8 expected goals total. Form backs the lean: the Islanders are 6-3-1 over their last ten, while the Canucks sit at minus-5 goal differential in the same stretch.

New York's edge runs deep into underlying play. The Islanders command 48.0% xG versus Vancouver's 44.0%, and lead 49.0% to 46.0% in Corsi percentage. These margins are modest but consistent—the kind that usually holds.

The structural advantage: Vancouver is running a 0.974 PDO, which is cold and screaming regression. They're due to catch some bounces. The Islanders sit at 0.993, neither particularly lucky nor unlucky.

What's this gap? Largely unsustainable variance colliding with a team that doesn't have enough talent to overcome it. Vancouver generated enough good chances to sustain higher production earlier in the season. Now they're at the whim of puck luck.

Individually, Filip Chytil carries Vancouver's offense at 1.03 xG/60 but has just 3 goals on a 15.0% shooting rate—he's overdue for positive regression too, though with less predictive power than team-level PDO. Drew O'Connor is working with 13 goals and 11 assists, quieter than his high-volume peer but efficient at 11.8% on shot.

For the Islanders, Anders Lee owns 1.20 xG/60 with 9 goals and 20 assists, operating as both finisher and orchestrator at a sustainable 6.4% shooting rate. Bo Horvat brings 18 goals and 10 assists on just 0.87 xG/60, converting at 12.8%—he's exceeding his expected output by a margin that rarely holds.

Defensively, Victor Mancini is the weak link for Vancouver, while Alexander Romanov holds that distinction in New York. These aren't game-breaking liabilities, but they're asymmetries worth noting when the game tightens.

The Islanders should win this. The model agrees. The only variable is how quickly Vancouver stops playing like a team running in concrete.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

VAN
Filip Chytil3G 0A
1.03 xG/60 · 1 HD · 15.0% sh
Drew O'Connor13G 11A
0.85 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.8% sh
NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters