Backcheck
Recap · STL at FLA

Blues run the Panthers off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Blues earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 9:16 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
STL
St. Louis Blues
6
Home
FLA
Florida Panthers
2
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.69Expected goals3.06
61% share for the better side
32Shot attempts (SOG)29
8High-danger chances6
54Corsi (all attempts)54
Score-adjusted: 46% / 54%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

St. Louis won 6–2 and dominated the underlying play — but the most revealing number is the one that didn't show on the scoreboard. Florida had 48% of shot attempts but generated only 39% of expected goals. The Panthers had volume; the Blues had teeth.

The xG split was 4.69–3.06, a 61–39 advantage to St. Louis. High-danger chances went 8–6 the same way. Florida underperformed its expected goals by 1.06 — a sign that chances came from low-quality areas. St. Louis did the opposite, outscoring its xG by 1.31.

St. Louis executed on multiple fronts. J. Hofer made 27 saves at a 0.931 save percentage, stopping 1.06 goals above expected. The Blues' shot quality was superior — 0.087 expected goals per shot versus Florida's 0.057. They cashed in from locations Florida's offense couldn't reach: two goals came from low-danger spots, the kind a goaltender must have. On the rush, St. Louis was lethal, scoring five goals on 29 chances.

Robert Thomas's wrist shot from the point at 16:28 marked the turning point, setting a tone the Panthers couldn't overcome.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
STL2 / 8 · 2.36 xG
FLA1 / 6 · 1.30 xG
Medium dangermid-range
STL2 / 14 · 1.77 xG
FLA1 / 12 · 1.24 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
STL2 / 32 · 0.57 xG
FLA0 / 36 · 0.51 xG

STL went 2-for-32 from low danger on 0.57 expected goals — 1.4 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
STL
6 G · 4.69 xG · +1.3
FLA
2 G · 3.06 xG · -1.1
01234567
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. HoferSTL
+1.1
D. TarasovFLA
-0.3

STL finished +1.3 against expected, FLA -1.1 — J. Hofer (STL) saved 1.1 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
STL
WRIST3/22
SNAP1/9
SLAP1/4
TIP IN1/5
BACKHAND0/5
DEFLECTED0/0
POKE0/1
OTHER0/8
FLA
WRIST1/27
SNAP0/2
SLAP0/4
TIP IN0/2
BACKHAND0/1
DEFLECTED1/2
POKE0/0
OTHER0/16
STL
FLA
Off the rush
5 G on 29 · 3.05 xG
1 G on 22 · 1.98 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 1 · 0.19 xG
1 G on 1 · 0.20 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: STL went 3-for-22, FLA 1-for-27. STL scored 5 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
R. Thomas
#18 · C · STL
2 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 19:09 TOI · +3
J. Berggren
#29 · R · STL
1 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 15:47 TOI · +2
P. Buchnevich
#89 · L · STL
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 18:22 TOI · +3
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • FLA had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
  • J. Hofer (STL) stopped 1.1 goals above expected.
  • STL had the higher quality looks — 0.087 xG/shot vs 0.057.
  • STL scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • STL was lethal off the rush — 5 goals on 29 rush chances.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · STL at FLA · 6:00 PM ET

Blues at Panthers: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 9:14 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

52%
FLA
Model favorite
48%
52%
STL50FLA

FLA by 4 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score STL 2.52.6 FLA; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

STL← edge
edge →FLA
49.0%5v5 xG%49.0%
48.0%Corsi%52.0%
2.34xGF / 602.48
2.40xGA / 602.56
2.00Goals for / gm1.98
2.12Goals against / gm2.21
1.000PDO — luck, not skill0.989

The season numbers split 33 — no clear process edge — and PDO (1.000 vs 0.989) says STL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model has this nearly dead even—a projected 2.5–2.6 goal spread with the Panthers holding 52% win probability. Not because both teams are identical, but because their advantages cancel out.

The Panthers have momentum. They've gone 6–3–1 over their last ten, while St. Louis sits at -14 goal differential over the same span—substantially behind. But at five-on-five, the gap collapses. Both teams sit at 49.0% expected goals. The meaningful difference lives in possession: Florida drives Corsi at 52.0% to St. Louis's 48.0%, meaning the Panthers will spend more time in the offensive zone. That territorial edge usually matters, except the Panthers' conversion underperforms their dominance; their PDO is 0.989, while the Blues sit at 1.000. St. Louis's scoring luck will regress downward.

J. Binnington plays on a back-to-back, which could matter. Watch for a backup start or a starter running on fumes.

The player matchups are sharp. Jimmy Snuggerud (15G, 22A) leads St. Louis at 0.86 xG/60 with an 11.9% shooting rate; he's earned his production. Dylan Holloway (13G, 24A) operates at 0.82 xG/60 with 10.8% shooting. For Florida, Sam Bennett (18G, 19A) leads at 0.97 xG/60 with 6 high-danger goals and 13.1% shooting. Brad Marchand (17G, 9A) runs 0.93 xG/60 but shoots at 19.5%—a rate that will almost certainly regress, suggesting his goal total is inflated.

The case for the Blues rests on St. Louis's lucky conversion not regressing as sharply as Florida's will. The case for the Panthers is simpler: they control the puck. In a matchup this tight, possession is an edge. But not decisive. Goaltending health will tip the balance as much as underlying skill.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

STL
Jimmy Snuggerud15G 22A
0.86 xG/60 · 2 HD · 11.9% sh
Dylan Holloway13G 24A
0.82 xG/60 · 1 HD · 10.8% sh
FLA
Sam Bennett18G 19A
0.97 xG/60 · 6 HD · 13.1% sh
Brad Marchand17G 9A
0.93 xG/60 · 3 HD · 19.5% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters