Blues run the Panthers off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Blues earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
St. Louis won 6–2 and dominated the underlying play — but the most revealing number is the one that didn't show on the scoreboard. Florida had 48% of shot attempts but generated only 39% of expected goals. The Panthers had volume; the Blues had teeth.
The xG split was 4.69–3.06, a 61–39 advantage to St. Louis. High-danger chances went 8–6 the same way. Florida underperformed its expected goals by 1.06 — a sign that chances came from low-quality areas. St. Louis did the opposite, outscoring its xG by 1.31.
St. Louis executed on multiple fronts. J. Hofer made 27 saves at a 0.931 save percentage, stopping 1.06 goals above expected. The Blues' shot quality was superior — 0.087 expected goals per shot versus Florida's 0.057. They cashed in from locations Florida's offense couldn't reach: two goals came from low-danger spots, the kind a goaltender must have. On the rush, St. Louis was lethal, scoring five goals on 29 chances.
Robert Thomas's wrist shot from the point at 16:28 marked the turning point, setting a tone the Panthers couldn't overcome.
The danger ladder
STL went 2-for-32 from low danger on 0.57 expected goals — 1.4 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
STL finished +1.3 against expected, FLA -1.1 — J. Hofer (STL) saved 1.1 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: STL went 3-for-22, FLA 1-for-27. STL scored 5 of theirs off the rush.
- FLA had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
- J. Hofer (STL) stopped 1.1 goals above expected.
- STL had the higher quality looks — 0.087 xG/shot vs 0.057.
- STL scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
- STL was lethal off the rush — 5 goals on 29 rush chances.