Backcheck
Recap · NSH at STL

Blues hold off the Predators

The Blues won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 11, 9:58 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NSH
Nashville Predators
2
Home
STL
St. Louis Blues
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.92Expected goals3.75
51% share for the better side
32Shot attempts (SOG)20
7High-danger chances8
72Corsi (all attempts)37
Score-adjusted: 69% / 31%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Blues won 3–2 against the Predators, though the expected-goals split (3.75–3.92) said Nashville deserved to advance. The closer team's luck held.

Nashville underperformed their xG by 1.92 goals. J. Hofer (STL) stole the show: 30 of 32 saves (0.938 SV%), 1.92 goals better than the shot quality merited. Without that performance, the scoreboard flips.

The raw territory favored Nashville. They held the ball, firing 32 attempts to St. Louis's 20. But St. Louis squeezed danger from scarcity. They generated 0.101 expected goals per shot versus Nashville's 0.054—nearly twice as lethal per attempt.

High-danger chances split 8–7 for St. Louis. Nashville created the better looks in aggregate but couldn't finish. The Predators scored twice on 28 rush chances. The Blues scored twice on 21—more clinical in transition.

The pivot came in the third period, when Fedor Svechkov's wrist shot from a sharp angle put St. Louis ahead. J. Saros (NSH) stopped 17 of 20 (0.850 SV%, +0.75 above expectation), a solid performance against relentless pressure that the final score didn't acknowledge.

St. Louis crashed the net with purpose, creating 4 rebound opportunities but converting none. Nashville managed 3. The Blues' method was surgical: fewer shots, higher conversion, and goaltending that overperformed when it mattered most.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NSH1 / 7 · 1.52 xG
STL1 / 8 · 2.02 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NSH1 / 17 · 1.78 xG
STL2 / 14 · 1.47 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NSH0 / 48 · 0.61 xG
STL0 / 15 · 0.25 xG

STL went 1-for-8 from high danger on 2.02 expected goals — 1.0 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NSH
2 G · 3.92 xG · -1.9
STL
3 G · 3.75 xG · -0.8
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. SarosNSH
+0.7
J. HoferSTL
+1.9

NSH finished -1.9 against expected, STL -0.8 — J. Hofer (STL) saved 1.9 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NSH
WRIST1/32
SNAP0/6
TIP IN1/5
SLAP0/6
BACKHAND0/2
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/20
STL
WRIST1/18
SNAP0/8
TIP IN1/4
SLAP0/1
BACKHAND1/3
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/3
NSH
STL
Off the rush
2 G on 28 · 2.71 xG
2 G on 21 · 2.32 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.32 xG
0 G on 4 · 0.61 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NSH went 1-for-32, STL 1-for-18. NSH scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
P. Buchnevich
#89 · L · STL
2 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 20:48 TOI · +2
R. Thomas
#18 · C · STL
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 20:43 TOI · +2
N. Hague
#41 · D · NSH
0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 17:05 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • NSH generated higher-quality looks than the shot total suggests.
  • J. Hofer (STL) stopped 1.9 goals above expected.
  • Open game — 15 high-danger chances combined (STL 8, NSH 7).
  • STL generated far more dangerous chances — 0.101 xG/shot vs 0.054. Quality over quantity.
  • STL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 21 rush chances.
  • NSH was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 28 rush chances.
  • STL created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NSH created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NSH underperformed xG by 1.9 — wasted quality chances.
  • J. Hofer (STL) saved 1.9 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NSH at STL · 8:00 PM ET

Predators at Blues: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 9:57 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

52%
STL
Model favorite
48%
52%
NSH50STL

STL by 4 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score NSH 2.42.6 STL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NSH← edge
edge →STL
49.0%5v5 xG%49.0%
50.0%Corsi%48.0%
2.48xGF / 602.34
2.58xGA / 602.40
1.84Goals for / gm2.00
2.21Goals against / gm2.12
0.992PDO — luck, not skill1.000

STL holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.992 vs 1.000) says STL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The Blues carry 52% win probability in a game the model projects at 2.4–2.6 goals. This is as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

St. Louis sits at -7 goal differential over their last 10 games, yet the season picture remains balanced. Both teams generated 49.0% xG—meaning neither earned an expected-goals edge. Nashville holds a slight puck-possession advantage at 50.0% Corsi% to St. Louis's 48.0%. PDO is nearly identical (Nashville 0.992, St. Louis 1.000), indicating that shooting luck and goaltending have played equal parts.

The striking detail: both teams have generated 0% of their goals from high-danger chances and 0% from rebounds. That void makes whoever converts a close-range opportunity or scores on a second chance the likely winner.

Players to Watch

Nashville

  • Zachary L'Heureux: 0.85 xG/60, 4G 0A, 1 HD goals, 16.0% shooting
  • Filip Forsberg: 0.80 xG/60, 23G 17A, 4 HD goals, 13.6% shooting

St. Louis

  • Jimmy Snuggerud: 0.86 xG/60, 15G 22A, 2 HD goals, 11.9% shooting
  • Dylan Holloway: 0.82 xG/60, 13G 24A, 1 HD goals, 10.8% shooting

Jonathan Marchessault is Nashville's defensive weak link; Jimmy Snuggerud fills that role for St. Louis. In a game with this little margin, those liabilities matter.

The model has this right. Expect tight margins decided by execution.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NSH
Zachary L'Heureux4G 0A
0.85 xG/60 · 1 HD · 16.0% sh
Filip Forsberg23G 17A
0.80 xG/60 · 4 HD · 13.6% sh
STL
Jimmy Snuggerud15G 22A
0.86 xG/60 · 2 HD · 11.9% sh
Dylan Holloway13G 24A
0.82 xG/60 · 1 HD · 10.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters