Backcheck
Recap · ANA at LAK

Kings pull away from the Ducks

The Kings earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 9:57 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
ANA
Anaheim Ducks
1
Home
LAK
Los Angeles Kings
6
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.99Expected goals3.54
54% share for the better side
26Shot attempts (SOG)30
3High-danger chances4
60Corsi (all attempts)69
Score-adjusted: 54% / 46%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Kings beat the Ducks 6-1, a scoreline that obscures a close underlying battle—expected goals split 3.54 to 2.99 in Los Angeles's favor. Goaltending decided the gap: A. Forsberg posted a 0.962 save percentage (+1.99 vs. expected), while L. Dostal managed 0.800 (−2.46).

The Kings controlled play without overwhelming it. Shot attempts favored Los Angeles 54 to 46 percent (30–26 on goal). High-danger chances split 4–3. Yet Los Angeles scored four goals on 33 rush attempts, the kind of efficiency that turns marginal puck possession into blowouts. Anaheim squandered its quality chances, underperforming their expected goals by 2.0 to Los Angeles's +2.5.

A. Laferriere led the Kings' attack with three goals in 16:24, including a slap shot from the top of the circles. A. Kopitar added three assists in 17:38. B. Dumoulin contributed two assists across 20:57 of ice time.

The 6-1 margin masked a three-shot differential that barely qualified as a rout. Goaltending and finishing—not dominance—made the difference.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
ANA1 / 3 · 0.62 xG
LAK1 / 4 · 0.93 xG
Medium dangermid-range
ANA0 / 17 · 1.95 xG
LAK4 / 18 · 1.84 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
ANA0 / 40 · 0.42 xG
LAK1 / 47 · 0.78 xG

LAK went 4-for-18 from medium danger on 1.84 expected goals — 2.2 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
ANA
1 G · 2.99 xG · -2.0
LAK
6 G · 3.54 xG · +2.5
01234567
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
L. DostalANA
-2.5
A. ForsbergLAK
+2.0

ANA finished -2.0 against expected, LAK +2.5 — L. Dostal (ANA) allowed 2.5 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
ANA
WRIST1/24
SNAP0/8
SLAP0/5
TIP IN0/1
BACKHAND0/3
DEFLECTED0/1
POKE0/0
OTHER0/18
LAK
WRIST0/25
SNAP1/8
SLAP1/7
TIP IN2/7
BACKHAND1/3
DEFLECTED1/1
POKE0/1
OTHER0/17
ANA
LAK
Off the rush
0 G on 24 · 1.77 xG
4 G on 33 · 2.66 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 6 · 0.89 xG
0 G on 0 · 0.00 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: ANA went 1-for-24, LAK 0-for-25. LAK scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
A. Kopitar
#11 · C · LAK
0 G · 3 A · 1 SOG · 17:38 TOI · +3
A. Laferriere
#14 · R · LAK
3 G · 0 A · 5 SOG · 16:24 TOI · +4
B. Dumoulin
#2 · D · LAK
0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 20:57 TOI · +3
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • A. Forsberg (LAK) stopped 2.0 goals above expected.
  • L. Dostal (ANA) gave up 2.5 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • LAK was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 33 rush chances.
  • ANA created 6 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • LAK outperformed their expected goals by 2.5 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
  • ANA underperformed xG by 2.0 — wasted quality chances.
  • A. Forsberg (LAK) saved 2.0 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · ANA at LAK · 9:00 PM ET

Ducks at Kings: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 9:57 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

52%
LAK
Model favorite
48%
52%
ANA50LAK

LAK by 4 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score ANA 2.52.6 LAK; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

ANA← edge
edge →LAK
52.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
52.0%Corsi%52.0%
2.80xGF / 602.42
2.59xGA / 602.20
2.09Goals for / gm1.85
2.32Goals against / gm1.71
0.981PDO — luck, not skill1.002

LAK holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.981 vs 1.002) says LAK has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.5-2.6 goal game with the Kings at 52% win probability. This is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find. Both teams carry identical 52% marks in expected goals and Corsi at even strength, and neither has found a particular edge in their respective tactical setups.

The divergence sits in shot quality and volume. Anaheim's PDO of 0.981 reflects a team running cold on goal conversion, a deficit due for positive regression. Los Angeles, at 1.002, sits closer to break-even on overall puck luck. That's the edge: not talent, but variance working in the Kings' favor.

Beckett Sennecke anchors Anaheim's offense at 1.03 xG per 60 minutes with 20 goals and 19 assists, including 8 high-danger chances. His 13.5% shooting rate suggests room for positive regression. Cutter Gauthier carries a similar xG/60 rate (0.99) but has converted at 12.9%, posting 25 goals and 16 assists with just 2 high-danger tallies. If Anaheim scores, it comes through volume, not precision.

For Los Angeles, Alex Laferriere's 0.87 xG/60 has produced 16 goals and 18 assists, with just 2 high-danger tallies and a 9.9% shooting rate. Jared Wright's 0.83 xG/60 generates mostly assists (4) rather than finishes (0 goals). The Kings' scoring is thinner but more opportunistic.

Both teams have registered no high-danger goals and no rebound goals—a sign either depth is thin or finishers aren't clicking. On the back end, Anaheim's Mason McTavish and Los Angeles's Adrian Kempe represent defensive liabilities that a sharper opponent would target.

This matchup hinges on whether Anaheim's cold streak continues or breaks. The model says it's a toss-up. In reality, it depends on whether Sennecke and Gauthier find the target.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

ANA
Beckett Sennecke20G 19A
1.03 xG/60 · 8 HD · 13.5% sh
Cutter Gauthier25G 16A
0.99 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.9% sh
LAK
Alex Laferriere16G 18A
0.87 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.9% sh
Jared Wright0G 4A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters