Backcheck
Recap · MTL at TBL

Lightning edge the Canadiens in a shootout

The Lightning stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 5.31–4.62 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 11, 10:12 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
MTL
Montreal Canadiens
4
Home
TBL
Tampa Bay Lightning
5
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

5.31Expected goals4.62
53% share for the better side
35Shot attempts (SOG)21
8High-danger chances10
86Corsi (all attempts)47
Score-adjusted: 68% / 32%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Tampa Bay won 5-4 in a shootout, but Montreal controlled the underlying game. Expected goals favored the Canadiens 5.31–4.62, and they outshot Tampa 35–21.

J. Johansson (TBL) made the difference. The Lightning goalie posted a 0.886 save percentage and finished +1.31 versus expected, stealing a win his team didn't quite earn at even strength. Montreal's J. Fowler held the line at +0.62, but couldn't overcome his team's conversion failures.

The Canadiens dominated in volume. They took 35 shots to Tampa's 21 and were more dangerous on the rush—four goals from 33 chances versus Tampa's two from 23. High-danger chances went nearly even (8 vs 10 for the Lightning).

But Montreal squandered its volume. Two goals came from low-danger spots—chances a goalie must stop. Seven rebound opportunities generated zero conversions. A team doesn't overcome the underlying advantage when it can't convert.

Brayden Point's snap shot from the slot decided the shootout.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
MTL1 / 8 · 2.13 xG
TBL2 / 10 · 2.78 xG
Medium dangermid-range
MTL1 / 19 · 2.31 xG
TBL1 / 13 · 1.56 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
MTL2 / 59 · 0.87 xG
TBL1 / 24 · 0.28 xG

MTL went 1-for-19 from medium danger on 2.31 expected goals — 1.3 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
MTL
4 G · 5.31 xG · -1.3
TBL
5 G · 4.62 xG · +0.4
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. FowlerMTL
+0.6
J. JohanssonTBL
+1.3

MTL finished -1.3 against expected, TBL +0.4 — J. Johansson (TBL) saved 1.3 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
MTL
SNAP4/37
WRIST0/6
TIP IN0/7
SLAP0/6
BACKHAND0/2
BAT0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/26
TBL
SNAP3/15
WRIST0/11
TIP IN1/5
SLAP0/1
BACKHAND0/2
BAT0/0
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/13
MTL
TBL
Off the rush
4 G on 33 · 2.65 xG
2 G on 23 · 2.78 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 7 · 1.59 xG
1 G on 2 · 0.41 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: MTL went 4-for-37, TBL 3-for-15. MTL scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Slafkovský
#20 · L · MTL
2 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 20:27 TOI · +1
N. Dobson
#53 · D · MTL
1 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 27:29 TOI
N. Kucherov
#86 · R · TBL
2 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 19:48 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • MTL generated higher-quality looks than the shot total suggests.
  • J. Johansson (TBL) stopped 1.3 goals above expected.
  • Open game — 18 high-danger chances combined (TBL 10, MTL 8).
  • TBL generated far more dangerous chances — 0.098 xG/shot vs 0.062. Quality over quantity.
  • MTL scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • TBL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 23 rush chances.
  • MTL was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 33 rush chances.
  • MTL created 7 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · MTL at TBL · 5:00 PM ET

The Lightning are the model's lean over the Canadiens — with PDO regression in play

By the ModelJul 11, 10:29 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

57%
TBL
Model favorite
43%
57%
MTL50TBL

TBL by 14 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score MTL 2.32.8 TBL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

MTL← edge
edge →TBL
48.0%5v5 xG%54.0%
49.0%Corsi%53.0%
2.41xGF / 602.67
2.62xGA / 602.28
2.24Goals for / gm2.38
1.96Goals against / gm1.85
1.018PDO — luck, not skill1.019

TBL holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.018 vs 1.019) says TBL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model gives Tampa Bay a 57% win probability, projecting a 2.3–2.8 Lightning victory. That confidence rests on Tampa's dominance in play generation.

The Lightning control 5v5 expected goals at 54.0% to Montreal's 48.0%—a structural edge in chance quality. That translates to shot volume: Tampa's 53.0% Corsi rate to Montreal's 49.0% means the Lightning dictate pace and territory.

But both teams are running hot. Tampa's PDO sits at 1.019, Montreal's at 1.018. They're converting chances faster than underlying play predicts, which means regression looms for both.

Montreal's offensive weight falls on Cole Caufield, who generates 0.97 expected goals per 60 minutes and has 33 goals and 16 assists on a 20.0% shooting rate. His production includes just 1 high-danger goal—oddly efficient. Oliver Kapanen (0.83 xG/60, 19 goals, 12 assists at 17.8% shooting) is secondary but has 4 high-danger goals, suggesting he's been finishing at the paint.

Tampa counters with Brandon Hagel leading at 1.10 xG/60—23 goals, 26 assists, 15.8% shooting, 2 high-danger goals. Anthony Cirelli (0.95 xG/60, 15 goals, 18 assists, 17.0% shooting) has 5 high-danger goals, meaning more of his scoring comes from dangerous chances.

The model favors Tampa's structural advantages. The PDO numbers predict one or both teams regress. If regression hits Montreal first, Tampa's edge widens. If it hits both simultaneously, this stays competitive.

Defensively, Montreal has Mike Matheson as a weak link; Tampa has Victor Hedman. Watch how each team's stars are deployed against those spots.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

MTL
Cole Caufield33G 16A
0.97 xG/60 · 1 HD · 20.0% sh
Oliver Kapanen19G 12A
0.83 xG/60 · 4 HD · 17.8% sh
TBL
Brandon Hagel23G 26A
1.10 xG/60 · 2 HD · 15.8% sh
Anthony Cirelli15G 18A
0.95 xG/60 · 5 HD · 17.0% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters