Backcheck
Recap · NYI at CHI

Islanders edge the Blackhawks in a shootout

The Islanders won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 11, 10:26 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NYI
New York Islanders
3
Home
CHI
Chicago Blackhawks
2
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.59Expected goals2.64
50% share for the better side
21Shot attempts (SOG)19
4High-danger chances3
51Corsi (all attempts)54
Score-adjusted: 45% / 55%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Islanders won 3-2 in a shootout, but Chicago created more high-danger scoring chances — 4 to New York's 3 — indicating underlying play that favored the visitors.

Chicago controlled 48% of shot attempts and nearly matched expected goals at 2.64 versus 2.59. Yet the high-danger chances told a different story. New York converted efficiently off the rush: 2 goals on 22 rush chances.

D. Rittich made 17 of 19 saves, exceeding expected performance by 0.64 goals. S. Knight stopped 19 of 21, a +0.59 outperformance. Both played above their norms.

Chicago created 3 rebound opportunities and converted zero. New York's rush efficiency and Bo Horvat's shootout precision — a snap from the high slot — decided it.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYI0 / 4 · 1.02 xG
CHI0 / 3 · 0.70 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYI2 / 10 · 1.13 xG
CHI2 / 9 · 1.23 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYI0 / 37 · 0.44 xG
CHI0 / 42 · 0.70 xG

NYI went 0-for-4 from high danger on 1.02 expected goals — 1.0 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYI
3 G · 2.59 xG · +0.4
CHI
2 G · 2.64 xG · -0.6
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
D. RittichNYI
+0.6
S. KnightCHI
+0.6

NYI finished +0.4 against expected, CHI -0.6 — D. Rittich (NYI) saved 0.6 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYI
WRIST1/22
SLAP0/4
SNAP1/1
TIP IN0/4
BACKHAND0/2
POKE0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/17
CHI
WRIST0/26
SLAP0/5
SNAP2/7
TIP IN0/2
BACKHAND0/1
POKE0/0
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/12
NYI
CHI
Off the rush
2 G on 22 · 2.02 xG
1 G on 23 · 2.01 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 2 · 0.31 xG
0 G on 3 · 0.23 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NYI went 1-for-22, CHI 0-for-26. NYI scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
O. Moore
#11 · C · CHI
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 15:21 TOI · +1
M. Schaefer
#48 · D · NYI
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 26:54 TOI
M. Barzal
#13 · C · NYI
0 G · 1 A · 0 SOG · 23:17 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • NYI was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 22 rush chances.
  • CHI created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NYI at CHI · 8:30 PM ET

Islanders at Blackhawks: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 10:25 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

53%
NYI
Model favorite
53%
47%
NYI50CHI

NYI by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYI 2.72.5 CHI; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NYI← edge
edge →CHI
48.0%5v5 xG%42.0%
49.0%Corsi%46.0%
2.48xGF / 602.17
2.69xGA / 602.94
1.78Goals for / gm1.84
1.94Goals against / gm2.41
0.993PDO — luck, not skill0.996

NYI holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.993 vs 0.996) says CHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.7-2.5 Islanders victory with New York at 53% win probability. This is as close to a pick'em as modern analytics produces.

New York carries form advantages that mask a closer underlying game. The Islanders are 5-4-1 over their last 10 games while Chicago sits at -19 goal differential—a gap between hot and struggling. Yet the underlying play tightens considerably. New York's 48.0% 5v5 expected goals share surpasses Chicago's 42.0%, and the Islanders' 49.0% Corsi% indicates possession dominance. Both metrics favor the Islanders, yet Chicago's 0.996 PDO sits marginally above New York's 0.993, implying neither team should expect shooting luck to dramatically pivot. The Blackhawks remain alive through goaltending variance.

S. Knight faces a back-to-back situation—the kind of variable that can swing games without appearing in traditional stat lines. A tired starter or an unplanned backup could tilt momentum.

Anders Lee anchors New York's offense: 1.20 expected goals per 60 minutes, 9 goals and 20 assists, with 2 high-danger chances and a 6.4% shooting rate that suggests sustainable scoring. Bo Horvat pursues a different profile—0.87 xG/60, 18 goals, a 12.8% shooting rate edging toward regression. Chicago counters with Tyler Bertuzzi, whose 18.0% shooting rate (20 goals, 7 high-danger chances) represents obvious payback risk. Connor Bedard carries deeper ballast: 0.82 xG/60, 17 goals, and 27 assists indicate a playmaker whose value survives the scoring decline inevitable in all NHL careers.

Defensive vulnerabilities matter in games this close. Alexander Romanov represents New York's weakest link; Anton Frondell occupies the equivalent for Chicago. Exploiting those gaps could matter more than which team's underlying luck regresses faster.

New York owns the underlying advantage. Chicago's ceiling remains high. The model calls it a coin flip, and the rosters agree.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
CHI
Tyler Bertuzzi20G 15A
0.85 xG/60 · 7 HD · 18.0% sh
Connor Bedard17G 27A
0.82 xG/60 · 5 HD · 11.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters