Backcheck
Recap · PHI at EDM

Flyers run the Oilers off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Flyers earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 10:53 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
5
Home
EDM
Edmonton Oilers
2
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

5.34Expected goals3.37
61% share for the better side
29Shot attempts (SOG)25
9High-danger chances7
66Corsi (all attempts)51
Score-adjusted: 51% / 49%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Philadelphia's 5–2 win stood up to scrutiny. The Flyers controlled 61% of 5v5 expected goals (5.34–3.37), a split that backs the scoreline.

Edmonton held shot volume—46% of attempts (25–29)—but little else. The Oilers managed 0 goals on 7 high-danger chances. The Flyers' D. Vladar was exceptional: 0.920 SV%, 7 of 7 stops on high-danger attempts, +1.37 against expected. Edmonton underperformed their xG by 1.37 goals.

Rush play was closest: Edmonton 2 on 21, Philadelphia 3 on 22. The gap widened in high-danger areas, where Philadelphia generated 9 chances to Edmonton's 7. Both teams crashed the net (Edmonton 5 rebound chances, Philadelphia 3), but neither converted a rebound.

Owen Tippett's wrist shot from the top of the circles (P3, 18:50) marked the turning point.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
PHI2 / 9 · 3.60 xG
EDM0 / 7 · 1.60 xG
Medium dangermid-range
PHI2 / 11 · 1.10 xG
EDM2 / 10 · 1.28 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
PHI1 / 46 · 0.65 xG
EDM0 / 34 · 0.48 xG

PHI went 2-for-9 from high danger on 3.60 expected goals — 1.6 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
PHI
5 G · 5.34 xG · -0.3
EDM
2 G · 3.37 xG · -1.4
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
D. VladarPHI
+1.4
C. PickardEDM
+1.3

PHI finished -0.3 against expected, EDM -1.4 — D. Vladar (PHI) saved 1.4 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
PHI
SNAP1/9
WRIST3/25
SLAP0/3
BACKHAND0/4
TIP IN0/2
DEFLECTED1/2
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/20
EDM
SNAP1/22
WRIST0/4
SLAP1/6
BACKHAND0/1
TIP IN0/2
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/15
PHI
EDM
Off the rush
3 G on 22 · 2.78 xG
2 G on 21 · 2.21 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.45 xG
0 G on 5 · 0.83 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: PHI went 1-for-9, EDM 1-for-22. PHI scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
C. McDavid
#97 · C · EDM
1 G · 1 A · 6 SOG · 23:17 TOI · -1
N. Seeler
#24 · D · PHI
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 18:23 TOI · +2
O. Tippett
#74 · R · PHI
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 15:58 TOI · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • D. Vladar (PHI) stopped 1.4 goals above expected.
  • Open game — 16 high-danger chances combined (EDM 7, PHI 9).
  • EDM couldn't convert — 0/7 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • EDM was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 21 rush chances.
  • PHI was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 22 rush chances.
  • EDM created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • PHI created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • D. Vladar was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 7 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · PHI at EDM · 3:30 PM ET

Flyers at Oilers: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 10:51 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

53%
EDM
Model favorite
47%
53%
PHI50EDM

EDM by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score PHI 2.42.5 EDM; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

PHI← edge
edge →EDM
51.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
48.0%Corsi%50.0%
2.26xGF / 602.64
2.20xGA / 602.47
1.96Goals for / gm2.13
1.82Goals against / gm2.29
1.008PDO — luck, not skill0.982

EDM holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.008 vs 0.982) says PHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.4–2.5 Edmonton goal game with the Oilers favored at 53% win probability. That's about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

Both teams have generated near-identical expected goal shares at 5v5. Philadelphia sits at 51.0% xG%, while Edmonton runs 52.0%. The shot-attempt advantage breaks similarly: the Flyers at 48.0% Corsi%, the Oilers at 50.0%. Neither team has won convincingly on the underlying metrics, which is precisely why the model can't choose.

The one thread pulling toward Edmonton is variance. The Oilers' PDO of 0.982 signals regression waiting to happen—they're running cold and should regress upward. Philadelphia's 1.008 suggests the opposite risk, though the spread is modest.

On the player level, the matchups cut both ways. Owen Tippett leads Philadelphia's advantage at 0.88 xG per 60 minutes with 19 goals and 18 assists; he's also banked 2 high-danger goals on a 12.1% shooting rate. Christian Dvorak generates a lighter 0.81 xG/60 but has converted at 11.2% with 12 goals and 21 assists, adding 3 high-danger goals.

Edmonton counters with Zach Hyman, who operates at 1.23 xG/60—the highest rate in this set—yet has only 1 high-danger goal despite 14 goals and 13 assists on 13.0% shooting. Connor McDavid sits at 0.92 xG/60, producing 25 goals and 33 assists with 5 high-danger goals at 13.7%, but his offensive generation doesn't match the Oilers' current win probability. That's what 53% odds look like.

Neither team generates high-danger or rebound goals at rates worth emphasizing—both sit at 0% for these categories. Philadelphia's defensive weakness centers on Dvorak, while Edmonton's is Jake Walman. That imbalance doesn't resolve the prediction either.

The Oilers hold the slimmest of advantages on paper and fortune. But the Flyers' expected goal share and balanced scoring depth make them a credible counterweight. Expect a tight game that could go either way.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
EDM
Zach Hyman14G 13A
1.23 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.0% sh
Connor McDavid25G 33A
0.92 xG/60 · 5 HD · 13.7% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters