Backcheck
Recap · MIN at LAK

Kings edge the Wild in a shootout

The Kings earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 11:10 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
MIN
Minnesota Wild
4
Home
LAK
Los Angeles Kings
5
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.02Expected goals4.67
54% share for the better side
28Shot attempts (SOG)39
5High-danger chances7
70Corsi (all attempts)84
Score-adjusted: 46% / 54%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Kings won 5-4 in a shootout, but J. Wallstedt was the difference-maker. His 0.921 save percentage (+1.67 versus expected) kept Minnesota within reach despite Los Angeles's dominance — 58% of shot attempts, 7–5 high-danger chances, and 4.67–4.02 expected goals. Both teams scored four rush goals, but Wallstedt's elite goaltending prevented a Kings rout.

D. Kuemper stopped 24 of 28 shots (0.857 SV%). Minnesota stayed tight through clinical 40% finishing on high-danger chances (2 of 5), but neither team converted rebound opportunities. Brandt Clarke's doorstep finish won it in the shootout.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
MIN2 / 5 · 1.14 xG
LAK2 / 7 · 1.50 xG
Medium dangermid-range
MIN1 / 20 · 2.30 xG
LAK2 / 20 · 2.26 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
MIN1 / 45 · 0.58 xG
LAK0 / 57 · 0.92 xG

MIN went 1-for-20 from medium danger on 2.30 expected goals — 1.3 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
MIN
4 G · 4.02 xG · -0.0
LAK
5 G · 4.67 xG · +0.3
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. WallstedtMIN
+1.7
D. KuemperLAK
+0.0

MIN finished -0.0 against expected, LAK +0.3 — J. Wallstedt (MIN) saved 1.7 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
MIN
WRIST1/26
SNAP2/10
SLAP0/4
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND0/5
BAT0/2
DEFLECTED1/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/19
LAK
WRIST2/42
SNAP0/2
SLAP0/7
TIP IN0/5
BACKHAND0/2
BAT0/0
DEFLECTED1/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER1/24
MIN
LAK
Off the rush
4 G on 36 · 3.27 xG
4 G on 35 · 3.03 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 4 · 0.50 xG
0 G on 3 · 0.43 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: MIN went 1-for-26, LAK 2-for-42. MIN scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
B. Faber
#7 · D · MIN
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 23:20 TOI
Q. Byfield
#55 · R · LAK
1 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 20:47 TOI
Q. Hughes
#43 · D · MIN
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 29:05 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • J. Wallstedt (MIN) stopped 1.7 goals above expected.
  • MIN was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/5 on HD chances (40%).
  • LAK was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 35 rush chances.
  • MIN was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 36 rush chances.
  • LAK created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • MIN created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • J. Wallstedt (MIN) saved 1.7 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · MIN at LAK · 9:00 PM ET

Wild at Kings: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 11:08 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

53%
LAK
Model favorite
47%
53%
MIN50LAK

LAK by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score MIN 2.42.5 LAK; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

MIN← edge
edge →LAK
52.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
48.0%Corsi%52.0%
2.55xGF / 602.42
2.40xGA / 602.20
2.04Goals for / gm1.85
1.93Goals against / gm1.71
1.007PDO — luck, not skill1.002

LAK holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.007 vs 1.002) says MIN has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a MIN 2.4 - 2.5 LAK game with the Kings at 53% win probability, which is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

Minnesota arrives as the hotter team by record: 7-1-2 in their last 10 games. The Kings, by contrast, are -8 in goal differential over the same span, a deficit that reads as defensive collapse more than poor luck. Yet the season 5v5 xG% splits the difference at 52.0% for both teams, suggesting their underlying quality is equivalent.

Where they diverge is possession and rest. Los Angeles drives Corsi at 52.0% to Minnesota's 48.0%—expect the Kings to control territory for stretches. They also carry a rest advantage, arriving on one day off while the Wild have three. That's typically considered a slight edge, though the Wild's recent hot streak suggests confidence matters here too.

D. Kuemper plays the back-to-back for Los Angeles. Monitor whether the Kings start their backup or trust their starter despite the fatigue; that choice alone can shift close games.

Minnesota's offensive punch runs through Matt Boldy, who sits at 22G 18A with 0.89 xG/60 and five high-danger goals on a 13.7% shooting rate. Robby Fabbri shadows him in secondary impact (0.88 xG/60), though Fabbri is marked likely out and projects to miss tonight. For Los Angeles, Alex Laferriere leads at 0.87 xG/60 with 16G 18A and two high-danger goals at 9.9% shooting. Jared Wright has no goals but four assists while generating 0.83 xG/60—a secondary scorer who's been efficient on low volume.

The Kings' matchup priority is neutralizing Boldy, whose high-danger count and elevated shooting rate signal real goal-scoring talent. The Wild face a similar task with Laferriere, whose 16-goal pace and high-danger goals argue he's become a genuine primary threat, not just a depth scorer riding variance.

Kuemper's fatigue, Minnesota's momentum, and Los Angeles' possession advantage cancel each other out. This is a coin flip.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

MIN
Matt Boldy22G 18A
0.89 xG/60 · 5 HD · 13.7% sh
Robby Fabbri2G 3A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 6.9% sh
LAK
Alex Laferriere16G 18A
0.87 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.9% sh
Jared Wright0G 4A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters