Backcheck
Recap · DAL at WSH

Stars run the Capitals off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Stars earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 11:40 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
DAL
Dallas Stars
4
Home
WSH
Washington Capitals
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

5.84Expected goals2.14
73% share for the better side
36Shot attempts (SOG)24
13High-danger chances1
66Corsi (all attempts)47
Score-adjusted: 52% / 48%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Dallas won 4-1 with a dominance that xG confirmed: the Stars controlled 73% of expected goals at 5v5, 5.84 to 2.14. Washington's 40% shot attempts came from low-danger looks—their 0.046 xG per shot versus Dallas's 0.088 told the real story.

The chance quality gap was massive. On high-danger chances, Dallas led 13-1. The Stars were especially lethal in transition, scoring 2 goals on 32 rush attempts and generating 6 rebound opportunities to keep pressure on the Capitals.

Goaltending didn't bridge the gap. L. Thompson saved 2.84 goals above expected, but that wasn't enough to overcome the underlying disadvantage. C. DeSmith saved 1.14 goals above expected, and Dallas—despite underperforming their xG by 1.84—still had more than enough.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
DAL4 / 13 · 3.63 xG
WSH0 / 1 · 0.24 xG
Medium dangermid-range
DAL0 / 17 · 1.83 xG
WSH1 / 12 · 1.30 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
DAL0 / 36 · 0.38 xG
WSH0 / 34 · 0.60 xG

DAL went 0-for-17 from medium danger on 1.83 expected goals — 1.8 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
DAL
4 G · 5.84 xG · -1.8
WSH
1 G · 2.14 xG · -1.1
01234567
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
C. DeSmithDAL
+1.1
L. ThompsonWSH
+2.8

DAL finished -1.8 against expected, WSH -1.1 — L. Thompson (WSH) saved 2.8 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
DAL
SNAP2/23
TIP IN1/7
WRIST1/6
SLAP0/5
BACKHAND0/5
BAT0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/19
WSH
SNAP1/18
TIP IN0/6
WRIST0/5
SLAP0/4
BACKHAND0/2
BAT0/0
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/11
DAL
WSH
Off the rush
2 G on 32 · 3.56 xG
0 G on 25 · 1.56 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 6 · 0.94 xG
0 G on 0 · 0.00 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: DAL went 2-for-23, WSH 1-for-18. DAL scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
S. Steel
#18 · C · DAL
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 18:16 TOI · +1
J. Carlson
#74 · D · WSH
0 G · 1 A · 0 SOG · 27:37 TOI · -2
E. Lindell
#23 · D · DAL
0 G · 1 A · 0 SOG · 26:49 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • WSH had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
  • C. DeSmith (DAL) stopped 1.1 goals above expected.
  • DAL had the higher quality looks — 0.088 xG/shot vs 0.046.
  • DAL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 32 rush chances.
  • DAL created 6 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • DAL underperformed xG by 1.8 — wasted quality chances.
  • L. Thompson (WSH) saved 2.8 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · DAL at WSH · 7:00 PM ET

Stars at Capitals: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 11:38 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
WSH
Model favorite
49%
51%
DAL50WSH

WSH by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score DAL 2.52.6 WSH; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

DAL← edge
edge →WSH
51.0%5v5 xG%50.0%
47.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.36xGF / 602.62
2.29xGA / 602.62
2.07Goals for / gm2.18
1.68Goals against / gm1.79
1.024PDO — luck, not skill1.018

The season numbers split 33 — no clear process edge — and PDO (1.024 vs 1.018) says DAL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.5-2.6 goal Dallas win, but that's almost a footnote: Washington sits at 51% win probability. This is about as even as hockey modeling gets.

The underlying matchup is genuinely balanced. Dallas owns 51.0% xG at 5v5, but Washington's 49.0% Corsi% means the Capitals are generating more shot volume. Both teams lean on efficiency rather than volume—Robertson's 12.4% shooting and Ovechkin's 13.8% suggest unsustainable conversion rates.

The regression risk cuts both ways. Dallas's PDO of 1.024 and Washington's 1.018 are both running hot, meaning both teams should expect some cooling. For a game this tight, that could be decisive.

Jason Robertson anchors the Stars' scoring with 25 goals and an xG/60 of 0.96, backed by Michael Bunting's quieter role—8 goals at a healthier 7.6% shooting rate. On the Washington side, Alex Ovechkin (19 goals, 0.97 xG/60) is nearly identical to Robertson in underlying production, both generating elite high-danger looks. Anthony Beauvillier (14 goals, 10.4% shooting) provides secondary scoring with a more sustainable rate than Ovechkin's 13.8%.

Both teams show identical tactical weaknesses: zero high-danger-goal rate and zero rebound-goal rate, which reads as either exceptional goaltending or an absence of crash-net urgency. Dallas's Tyler Myers and Washington's Declan Chisholm are defensive weak links, though in a game where shot quality matters far more than volume, that may not surface.

The Capitals' marginal win-probability edge reflects their Corsi advantage—they're the more possession-heavy team. But Dallas owns the expected-goals edge and superior conversion rate, however unsustainable. One team leaves this game frustrated that underlying play didn't translate; the other gets lucky that it did. The model says it's a coin flip, and the numbers agree.

Three Stars

  • Jason Robertson, DAL
  • Alex Ovechkin, WSH
  • Anthony Beauvillier, WSH
Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

DAL
Jason Robertson25G 21A
0.96 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.4% sh
Michael Bunting8G 14A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 7.6% sh
WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters