Backcheck
Recap · CHI at NSH

Blackhawks shut out the Predators, 3-0

The Blackhawks stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.19–4.62 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 12, 12:12 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
CHI
Chicago Blackhawks
3
Home
NSH
Nashville Predators
0
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.19Expected goals4.62
59% share for the better side
21Shot attempts (SOG)36
6High-danger chances8
41Corsi (all attempts)64
Score-adjusted: 36% / 64%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Nashville dominated and lost 3-0. The Predators controlled 59% of expected goals, held 63% of shot attempts, and generated eight high-danger chances. D. Commesso, the Blackhawks goaltender, stopped all of it.

Commesso saved 4.62 goals above expectation and posted a 1.000 save percentage on 36 shots. This was a heist. The Predators converted zero of their eight high-danger chances. Chicago scored three goals from twenty-two rush attempts, a conversion rate built on timing rather than volume.

J. Saros performed solidly for Nashville, stopping 1.19 goals above expected. The Predators created eight rebound opportunities and crashed the net effectively, yet found Commesso perfect whenever it mattered most.

C. Bedard led Chicago with two assists in just over twenty minutes. T. Bertuzzi scored once and added an assist in under sixteen minutes. A. Levshunov contributed an assist from the blue line in twenty-three minutes.

The analytics favored Nashville. The scoreboard didn't. The Predators owned play and still lost because one team made their marginal chances count while the other couldn't beat a goaltender who didn't miss.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CHI2 / 6 · 1.65 xG
NSH0 / 8 · 1.70 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CHI1 / 12 · 1.23 xG
NSH0 / 20 · 2.30 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CHI0 / 23 · 0.32 xG
NSH0 / 36 · 0.63 xG

NSH went 0-for-20 from medium danger on 2.30 expected goals — 2.3 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CHI
3 G · 3.19 xG · -0.2
NSH
0 G · 4.62 xG · -4.6
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
D. CommessoCHI
+4.6
J. SarosNSH
+1.2

CHI finished -0.2 against expected, NSH -4.6 — D. Commesso (CHI) saved 4.6 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CHI
WRIST2/15
SNAP0/7
SLAP0/5
TIP IN0/2
BACKHAND1/2
WRAP AROUND0/0
BETWEEN LEGS0/0
OTHER0/10
NSH
WRIST0/28
SNAP0/8
SLAP0/5
TIP IN0/7
BACKHAND0/2
WRAP AROUND0/1
BETWEEN LEGS0/1
OTHER0/12
CHI
NSH
Off the rush
3 G on 22 · 2.65 xG
0 G on 31 · 2.77 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.37 xG
0 G on 8 · 1.42 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: CHI went 2-for-15, NSH 0-for-28. CHI scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
C. Bedard
#98 · C · CHI
0 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 20:54 TOI · +2
T. Bertuzzi
#59 · L · CHI
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 15:50 TOI · +1
A. Levshunov
#55 · D · CHI
0 G · 1 A · 0 SOG · 23:32 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • CHI stole this one. NSH owned 59% of the xG and lost.
  • D. Commesso (CHI) stopped 4.6 goals above expected.
  • NSH couldn't convert — 0/8 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • CHI was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 22 rush chances.
  • NSH created 8 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • CHI created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NSH underperformed xG by 4.6 — wasted quality chances.
  • D. Commesso (CHI) saved 4.6 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • D. Commesso was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 8 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · CHI at NSH · 8:00 PM ET

The Predators are the model's lean over the Blackhawks on the underlying numbers

By the ModelJul 12, 12:11 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

58%
NSH
Model favorite
42%
58%
CHI50NSH

NSH by 16 points of win probability — a clear lean. Projected score CHI 2.42.9 NSH; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

CHI← edge
edge →NSH
42.0%5v5 xG%49.0%
46.0%Corsi%50.0%
2.17xGF / 602.48
2.94xGA / 602.58
1.84Goals for / gm1.84
2.41Goals against / gm2.21
0.996PDO — luck, not skill0.992

NSH holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.996 vs 0.992) says CHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

Nashville holds the structural advantage. The model projects a 2.4-2.9 Chicago game with the Predators at 58% win probability. That gap stems from superior underlying play: Nashville's 49.0% 5v5 xG to Chicago's 42.0%, plus a 50.0% Corsi rate that forecasts territorial dominance throughout the night.

Goaltending uncertainty complicates the forecast. J. Saros faces a back-to-back, raising the possibility of a backup start or a fatigued starter managing a thin margin.

Chicago's offensive load falls on Tyler Bertuzzi and Connor Bedard. Bertuzzi carries 20 goals on a 0.85 xG/60 pace with an 18.0% shooting rate; his seven high-danger markers validate that he's converting premium chances. Bedard (17G, 0.82 xG/60, 11.8% shooting) has added 27 assists, marking him as a playmaker first and finisher second—his below-trend shooting rate suggests latent upside.

Nashville's offense centers on Filip Forsberg (23G, 0.80 xG/60, 13.6% shooting) and Zachary L'Heureux (0.85 xG/60, 16.0% shooting). Forsberg's 23 goals set the Predators' offensive benchmark. L'Heureux generates chances at an elite 0.85 xG/60 pace but has managed only four goals, suggesting his opportunity rate hasn't yet crystallized into offensive volume.

The PDO differential is negligible—Chicago at 0.996, Nashville at 0.992—so the Predators' edge isn't variance or lucky bounces. It's shot share and net positioning. That's the model's lean.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

CHI
Tyler Bertuzzi20G 15A
0.85 xG/60 · 7 HD · 18.0% sh
Connor Bedard17G 27A
0.82 xG/60 · 5 HD · 11.8% sh
NSH
Zachary L'Heureux4G 0A
0.85 xG/60 · 1 HD · 16.0% sh
Filip Forsberg23G 17A
0.80 xG/60 · 4 HD · 13.6% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters