Backcheck
Recap · DAL at LAK

Stars run the Kings off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Stars earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 12:33 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
DAL
Dallas Stars
3
Home
LAK
Los Angeles Kings
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.99Expected goals1.94
61% share for the better side
18Shot attempts (SOG)25
5High-danger chances1
44Corsi (all attempts)48
Score-adjusted: 45% / 55%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Stars beat the Kings 3–1, and the underlying numbers backed it up — they controlled 61% of 5v5 expected goals (2.99–1.94).

But here's what really separated them: the Kings held 58% of shot attempts (25–18 on goal), yet finished with only 39% of expected goals. Dallas turned high-volume inefficiency into a runaway. Their shot efficiency told the story — 0.068 xG per attempt versus Los Angeles' 0.040.

The Kings created fewer dangerous looks. They managed just one high-danger chance to Dallas' five. Worse, they underperformed even their modest xG by 0.94 goals — they got the looks they deserved and still fell short.

Dallas executed on the chances that mattered. Two goals came from low-danger spots, the kind a goalie must stop but sometimes doesn't. More importantly, they were lethal on the rush: two goals on 17 rush chances. The Kings crashed the net effectively, manufacturing four rebound opportunities, but converted zero.

J. Oettinger (Dallas) made 24 saves on 25 shots for a 0.960 save percentage, running 0.94 goals better than expected. D. Kuemper (Los Angeles) stopped 15 of 17 for 0.882, also outplaying his xG by 0.99 — a rare oasis in a blowout where the losing goalie actually performed.

The turning point came on Matt Duchene's wrist shot from the point with 19:42 remaining in the third period.

Three Stars

  • #23 E. Lindell (DAL) — 2A in 26:36
  • #18 S. Steel (DAL) — 2A in 18:20
  • #92 B. Clarke (LAK) — 1A in 21:23
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
DAL1 / 5 · 1.97 xG
LAK0 / 1 · 0.27 xG
Medium dangermid-range
DAL0 / 6 · 0.58 xG
LAK1 / 11 · 1.21 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
DAL2 / 33 · 0.43 xG
LAK0 / 36 · 0.46 xG

DAL went 2-for-33 from low danger on 0.43 expected goals — 1.6 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
DAL
3 G · 2.99 xG · +0.0
LAK
1 G · 1.94 xG · -0.9
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. OettingerDAL
+0.9
D. KuemperLAK
+1.0

DAL finished +0.0 against expected, LAK -0.9 — D. Kuemper (LAK) saved 1.0 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
DAL
WRIST1/12
BACKHAND1/6
TIP IN0/3
SNAP1/4
SLAP0/3
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/15
LAK
WRIST1/27
BACKHAND0/1
TIP IN0/3
SNAP0/1
SLAP0/2
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/14
DAL
LAK
Off the rush
2 G on 17 · 1.26 xG
1 G on 16 · 0.94 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 2 · 0.29 xG
0 G on 4 · 0.57 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: DAL went 1-for-12, LAK 1-for-27. DAL scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
E. Lindell
#23 · D · DAL
0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 26:36 TOI · +2
S. Steel
#18 · C · DAL
0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 18:20 TOI · +2
B. Clarke
#92 · D · LAK
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 21:23 TOI · -2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • LAK had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
  • DAL had the higher quality looks — 0.068 xG/shot vs 0.040.
  • DAL scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • DAL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 17 rush chances.
  • LAK created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · DAL at LAK · 10:00 PM ET

Stars at Kings: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 12:32 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

53%
LAK
Model favorite
47%
53%
DAL50LAK

LAK by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score DAL 2.32.5 LAK; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

DAL← edge
edge →LAK
51.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
47.0%Corsi%52.0%
2.36xGF / 602.42
2.29xGA / 602.20
2.07Goals for / gm1.85
1.68Goals against / gm1.71
1.024PDO — luck, not skill1.002

LAK holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.024 vs 1.002) says DAL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.3–2.5 game with the Kings at 53% win probability—as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

Los Angeles dominates possession. The Kings drive Corsi at 52.0%, sustaining territorial advantage. Dallas counters with a modest shot quality edge (xG% 51.0% versus 52.0%), but that's within noise.

Dallas's PDO sits at 1.024—the Stars are running hot and regression is likely. The Kings' 1.002 plays closer to sustainable, a marginal edge in luck.

A. Forsberg faces a back-to-back assignment, a variable worth monitoring for either a backup start or a tired starter.

Jason Robertson leads Dallas's offense at 25 goals and 21 assists with a 0.96 xG/60 rate and 12.4% shooting. He's scored 2 hard-chance goals. Michael Bunting supports at 8 goals and 14 assists with 0.83 xG/60 and 7.6% shooting.

Alex Laferriere anchors LA's attack at 16 goals and 18 assists with 0.87 xG/60 and 9.9% shooting. He's also scored 2 hard-chance goals. Jared Wright provides depth at 4 assists and 0.83 xG/60.

Dallas generates 0% of its goals from hard chances and 0% from rebounds, a stark limitation given the team's talent. Los Angeles shows the same pattern. Tyler Myers represents Dallas's defensive weak link; Adrian Kempe does the same for the Kings.

The teams cancel out: territorial possession versus talent, regression versus baseline sustainability. This is truly a coin flip.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

DAL
Jason Robertson25G 21A
0.96 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.4% sh
Michael Bunting8G 14A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 7.6% sh
LAK
Alex Laferriere16G 18A
0.87 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.9% sh
Jared Wright0G 4A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters