Red Wings run the Sharks off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Red Wings earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
The Red Wings controlled 68% of 5v5 expected goals (5.58–2.60) and 53% of shot attempts—the kind of dominance that typically produces a blowout. They won only 4-2 because Y. Askarov saved 2.58 goals above expected and Detroit underperformed its xG by 1.58. Without those offsets, this would've been a rout.
Detroit's advantage in shot quality was stark. They generated 8 high-danger chances to San Jose's 4, and their per-shot efficiency tells the story: 0.085 xG per attempt versus 0.055. The Red Wings exploited their superiority off the rush, converting 2 goals on 34 chances, and created 5 rebound opportunities, though they left all five on the table.
The outlier was Y. Askarov. With a 0.875 SV%, he saved 21 of 24 shots and beat his expected performance by 2.58 goals—a save rate that kept San Jose within striking distance. J. Gibson (DET) was solid with a 0.909 SV%, overperforming by 0.60, but Askarov's night was the difference between a comfortable result and a decisive one.
The danger ladder
DET went 1-for-19 from medium danger on 2.23 expected goals — 1.2 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
SJS finished -0.6 against expected, DET -1.6 — Y. Askarov (SJS) saved 2.6 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Snap shots carried the volume: SJS went 0-for-10, DET 2-for-17. DET scored 2 of theirs off the rush.
- SJS generated higher-quality looks than the shot total suggests.
- Y. Askarov (SJS) stopped 2.6 goals above expected.
- DET generated far more dangerous chances — 0.085 xG/shot vs 0.055. Quality over quantity.
- DET was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 34 rush chances.
- DET created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- DET underperformed xG by 1.6 — wasted quality chances.
- Y. Askarov (SJS) saved 2.6 goals above expected — stole the show.