Backcheck
Recap · OTT at DET

Red Wings run the Senators off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Red Wings earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 1:27 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
OTT
Ottawa Senators
3
Home
DET
Detroit Red Wings
4
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.36Expected goals5.18
61% share for the better side
22Shot attempts (SOG)34
7High-danger chances8
50Corsi (all attempts)67
Score-adjusted: 41% / 59%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Detroit won 4-3 in overtime. The Red Wings dominated the expected-goals battle, controlling 61% (5.18–3.36), and out-attempted Ottawa 34–22. Yet they underperformed their xG by 1.18 goals because J. Reimer stopped 1.2 more than expected.

Execution on the rush and power play separated the teams. On the rush, Detroit scored 2 goals on 33 chances; Ottawa scored 2 on 24 (a more efficient rate). On the power play, Detroit was ruthless — 2 goals on 24 shots (3.05 xG) — while Ottawa managed 2 for 8 (0.70 xG). Detroit also converted two low-danger situations, where the opposing goaltender must be sharp. J. Gibson finished 19 of 22 saves.

A. DeBrincat won it with a snap shot from the high slot at 00:36 of overtime, finishing 1–1 in 23:14. A. Copp added two assists in 19:51. D. Batherson recorded 1–1 for Ottawa in 14:37.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
OTT2 / 7 · 1.43 xG
DET1 / 8 · 2.58 xG
Medium dangermid-range
OTT1 / 12 · 1.38 xG
DET1 / 16 · 1.76 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
OTT0 / 31 · 0.55 xG
DET2 / 43 · 0.85 xG

DET went 1-for-8 from high danger on 2.58 expected goals — 1.6 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
OTT
3 G · 3.36 xG · -0.4
DET
4 G · 5.18 xG · -1.2
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. ReimerOTT
+1.2
J. GibsonDET
+0.4

OTT finished -0.4 against expected, DET -1.2 — J. Reimer (OTT) saved 1.2 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
OTT
WRIST0/16
TIP IN1/5
SNAP1/9
SLAP0/5
BACKHAND1/3
BAT0/0
BETWEEN LEGS0/0
OTHER0/12
DET
WRIST1/27
TIP IN0/11
SNAP2/5
SLAP0/5
BACKHAND0/6
BAT0/1
BETWEEN LEGS1/1
OTHER0/11
OTT
DET
Off the rush
2 G on 24 · 2.53 xG
2 G on 33 · 2.86 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 2 · 0.38 xG
1 G on 6 · 1.80 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: OTT went 0-for-16, DET 1-for-27. OTT scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
A. DeBrincat
#93 · R · DET
1 G · 1 A · 7 SOG · 23:14 TOI · +1
A. Copp
#18 · C · DET
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 19:51 TOI · +1
D. Batherson
#19 · R · OTT
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 14:37 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • J. Reimer (OTT) stopped 1.2 goals above expected.
  • Open game — 15 high-danger chances combined (DET 8, OTT 7).
  • DET scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • DET was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 33 rush chances.
  • OTT was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 24 rush chances.
  • DET created 6 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • DET power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 24 PP shots (3.05 xG).
  • OTT power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 8 PP shots (0.70 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · OTT at DET · 5:00 PM ET

Senators at Red Wings: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 1:25 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

54%
OTT
Model favorite
54%
46%
OTT50DET

OTT by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score OTT 2.62.4 DET; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

OTT← edge
edge →DET
56.0%5v5 xG%49.0%
53.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.66xGF / 602.38
2.12xGA / 602.50
2.18Goals for / gm1.73
1.99Goals against / gm2.07
0.993PDO — luck, not skill0.985

OTT holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.993 vs 0.985) says OTT has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

Ottawa opens as a 54 percent favorite in a matchup the model sizes at 2.6 expected goals to 2.4—genuinely even.

The Senators' case is built on possession. They own 56.0 percent expected goals and 53.0 percent Corsi at 5v5, dominant margins that in an extended series become decisive. Detroit counters from behind: 49.0 percent in both metrics, suggesting they win when finish outpaces process. In a single game, that reversal is plausible.

Brady Tkachuk drives Ottawa's attack at 1.19 expected goals per 60 minutes, and his 11 goals come at a 7.5 percent shooting rate—below elite standard, suggesting room for regression. Dylan Cozens adds secondary punch at 1.00 xG/60 and 13 goals, but a 9.5 percent shooting rate hints at unsustainable efficiency. Alex DeBrincat's profile inverts: he generates only 0.88 xG/60 yet has 17 goals at 9.0 percent, implying elite finishing compensates for fewer chances. Marco Kasper, at 0.81 xG/60 and 6.1 percent shooting, barely registers and can't rescue Detroit if Ottawa's possession translates to goals.

The verdict is taut. Ottawa's underlying advantage is real but depends on finishing; Detroit's efficiency edge is real but depends on getting chances. The Senators should win this game on balance. The Red Wings can. The 54 percent split between them is accurate.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

OTT
Brady Tkachuk11G 20A
1.19 xG/60 · 2 HD · 7.5% sh
Dylan Cozens13G 15A
1.00 xG/60 · 1 HD · 9.5% sh
DET
Alex DeBrincat17G 28A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.0% sh
Marco Kasper7G 8A
0.81 xG/60 · 1 HD · 6.1% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters