Backcheck
Recap · NYR at ANA

Ducks hold off the Rangers

The Ducks earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 1:40 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NYR
New York Rangers
3
Home
ANA
Anaheim Ducks
5
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.29Expected goals4.59
58% share for the better side
22Shot attempts (SOG)26
4High-danger chances4
53Corsi (all attempts)55
Score-adjusted: 50% / 50%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Both teams created four high-danger chances, yet Anaheim converted two while New York converted zero. The scoreboard read 5–3 Ducks, but the tied high-danger count explains the result: ruthless efficiency in dangerous areas.

The Ducks controlled 54% of shot attempts (26–22) and dominated expected goals 4.59–3.29 (58–42). Yet the quality gap was sharper: Anaheim generated 0.083 expected goals per shot versus New York's 0.062, a meaningful advantage in how they deployed their opportunities.

New York scored twice from low-danger spots — chances L. Dostal should have stopped. Dostal made 19 of 22 (0.864 SV%), while S. Martin stopped 21 of 25 (0.840). Martin beat his expected save percentage by 0.59, yet the gap still favored Anaheim's opportunism.

The Rangers' power play was a bright spot: 2 goals on 15 shots, 1.43 expected goals, offsetting their even-strength deficit. Anaheim's transition game proved decisive. The Ducks scored twice on 28 rush attempts, showing the conversion efficiency New York (2 goals on 20 rushes) could not match.

The turning point: Cutter Gauthier's snap shot from the point at 19:24 of the third period crystallized Anaheim's dominance.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYR0 / 4 · 0.92 xG
ANA2 / 4 · 2.22 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYR1 / 17 · 1.83 xG
ANA3 / 16 · 1.73 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYR2 / 32 · 0.54 xG
ANA0 / 35 · 0.64 xG

NYR went 2-for-32 from low danger on 0.54 expected goals — 1.5 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYR
3 G · 3.29 xG · -0.3
ANA
5 G · 4.59 xG · +0.4
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
S. MartinNYR
+0.6
L. DostalANA
+0.3

NYR finished -0.3 against expected, ANA +0.4 — S. Martin (NYR) saved 0.6 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYR
SNAP1/12
SLAP2/9
WRIST0/6
TIP IN0/7
BACKHAND0/3
DEFLECTED0/2
BAT0/0
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/14
ANA
SNAP4/24
SLAP0/6
WRIST0/4
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND1/1
DEFLECTED0/0
BAT0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/15
NYR
ANA
Off the rush
2 G on 20 · 1.54 xG
2 G on 28 · 1.90 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 7 · 1.08 xG
2 G on 5 · 0.94 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: NYR went 1-for-12, ANA 4-for-24. NYR scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Miller
#8 · C · NYR
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 22:41 TOI · -2
A. Panarin
#10 · L · NYR
1 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 21:15 TOI · -1
V. Trocheck
#16 · C · NYR
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 19:50 TOI · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • ANA generated far more dangerous chances — 0.083 xG/shot vs 0.062. Quality over quantity.
  • ANA was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/4 on HD chances (50%).
  • NYR scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • ANA was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 28 rush chances.
  • NYR was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 20 rush chances.
  • ANA created 5 rebound opportunities (2 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NYR created 7 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NYR power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 15 PP shots (1.43 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NYR at ANA · 10:00 PM ET

The Ducks are the model's lean over the Rangers — with PDO regression in play

By the ModelJul 12, 1:48 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

55%
ANA
Model favorite
45%
55%
NYR50ANA

ANA by 10 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYR 2.42.7 ANA; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NYR← edge
edge →ANA
48.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
49.0%Corsi%52.0%
2.26xGF / 602.80
2.40xGA / 602.59
1.88Goals for / gm2.09
1.90Goals against / gm2.32
1.009PDO — luck, not skill0.981

ANA holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.009 vs 0.981) says NYR has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects an Anaheim 2.4–2.7 New York goal range with the Ducks at 55% win probability.

Both teams are bleeding goals. The Ducks sit minus-12 over their last 10; the Rangers are minus-17. But Anaheim dominates the underlying play. The Ducks generate 52.0% expected goals at even strength versus New York's 48.0%, controlling possession at 52.0% Corsi. They own the territorial tilt.

The wrinkle: Anaheim's 0.981 PDO reads as outright bad puck luck, while New York's 1.009 reads as unsustainable good luck. Expect positive regression favoring the Ducks.

Goaltending adds a layer. V. Husso plays on the back-to-back for the Rangers — watch for either a backup or a tired starter.

Beckett Sennecke is Anaheim's engine. He posts 1.03 expected goals per 60 minutes, 20 goals and 19 assists, and drives 8 high-danger chances. That volume makes him the Ducks' most dangerous player. Cutter Gauthier, also a driver at 0.99 xG/60, brings 25 goals and 16 assists to stress New York's depth.

For the Rangers, Adam Sykora carries 0.91 xG/60 with a blistering 20.0% shooting rate — proof he's heating up on just 3 goals and 1 assist. Gabe Perreault adds 8 goals with a 13.1% shooting clip and 2 high-danger chances, a secondary threat.

New York's defensive liability sits with Vincent Iorio. Anaheim's is Mason McTavish. Neither team is converting off the rush — both sit at 0% high-danger goal rate and 0% rebound goal rate. This means the Ducks' volume edge matters even more. They'll pile chances; at worst, they'll eventually find one.

The Ducks are cold but own what matters: the puck. The Rangers are warm but own nothing underneath. When PDO regresses, this game's expected winner becomes the actual one.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
ANA
Beckett Sennecke20G 19A
1.03 xG/60 · 8 HD · 13.5% sh
Cutter Gauthier25G 16A
0.99 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.9% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters