Backcheck
Recap · STL at DAL

Stars hold off the Blues

The Stars won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 12, 2:17 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
STL
St. Louis Blues
2
Home
DAL
Dallas Stars
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.42Expected goals2.53
51% share for the better side
22Shot attempts (SOG)19
2High-danger chances4
45Corsi (all attempts)43
Score-adjusted: 51% / 49%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Dallas won 3–2 despite St. Louis controlling play — the Blues took 22 shot attempts to the Stars' 19. When the team that out-shoots you wins, it's usually execution: better goaltending, better scoring efficiency, or both.

Dallas had both. J. Oettinger stopped 20 of 22 (0.909 save percentage); J. Binnington stopped 16 of 19 (0.842). That gap in save percentage, applied to Dallas's shot total, was worth roughly one goal.

The Stars were clinical in the high-danger zone. They converted 2 of their 4 high-danger chances (50 percent) while the Blues managed just 2 high-danger looks total. Jason Robertson's snap shot from the slot (Period 3, 19:00) was the turning point, the moment Dallas's efficiency finally showed on the scoreboard.

Both teams scored twice off the rush — the Blues on 18 chances, the Stars on 16. But Dallas won elsewhere: a dominant power play (2 goals on 8 shots, 0.91 expected goals) and sharp finishing in high-danger opportunities. Possession doesn't win games. Execution does.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
STL0 / 2 · 0.66 xG
DAL2 / 4 · 1.39 xG
Medium dangermid-range
STL1 / 13 · 1.38 xG
DAL1 / 9 · 0.73 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
STL1 / 30 · 0.38 xG
DAL0 / 30 · 0.41 xG

STL went 0-for-2 from high danger on 0.66 expected goals — 0.7 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
STL
2 G · 2.42 xG · -0.4
DAL
3 G · 2.53 xG · +0.5
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. BinningtonSTL
-0.5
J. OettingerDAL
+0.4

STL finished -0.4 against expected, DAL +0.5 — J. Binnington (STL) allowed 0.5 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
STL
SNAP0/16
WRIST0/6
SLAP2/5
TIP IN0/1
BACKHAND0/1
OTHER0/16
DAL
SNAP3/15
WRIST0/9
SLAP0/3
TIP IN0/2
BACKHAND0/2
OTHER0/12
STL
DAL
Off the rush
2 G on 18 · 1.82 xG
2 G on 16 · 1.34 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.37 xG
1 G on 1 · 0.21 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: STL went 0-for-16, DAL 3-for-15. STL scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Robertson
#21 · L · DAL
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 22:54 TOI · +1
R. Hintz
#24 · C · DAL
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 20:12 TOI · +1
P. Buchnevich
#89 · L · STL
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 19:42 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • DAL was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/4 on HD chances (50%).
  • DAL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 16 rush chances.
  • STL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 18 rush chances.
  • STL created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • DAL power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 8 PP shots (0.91 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · STL at DAL · 8:00 PM ET

Blues at Stars: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 2:15 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

53%
DAL
Model favorite
47%
53%
STL50DAL

DAL by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score STL 2.32.5 DAL; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

STL← edge
edge →DAL
49.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
48.0%Corsi%47.0%
2.34xGF / 602.36
2.40xGA / 602.29
2.00Goals for / gm2.07
2.12Goals against / gm1.68
1.000PDO — luck, not skill1.024

DAL holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.000 vs 1.024) says DAL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The models split the difference. Dallas projects at 53% win probability in a game expected to land between 2.3 and 2.5 goals for the home team. That margin is close to a pick'em—execution over sixty minutes matters more than the roster gap.

St. Louis is playing catch-up. The Blues are minus-13 in goal differential over their last ten games, a skid extending their season-long structural problem: 49.0% expected goals trails Dallas's 51.0%, meaning the gap is real, not noise. Their 48.0% Corsi—a metric tracking shot volume for and against—lags Dallas's 47.0%. A 1.000 PDO has kept the Blues competitive; Dallas's 1.024 means the Stars are converting at rates above their underlying shot quality, a position that historically can't sustain.

St. Louis's offensive structure depends on two players sustaining above-model production. Jimmy Snuggerud generates 0.86 expected goals per 60 minutes with 15 goals and 22 assists on 11.9% shooting and two high-danger goals. That output exceeds what his volume alone predicts, a sign either of elite finishing or temporary variance. Dylan Holloway runs parallel at 0.82 xG/60 with 13 goals and 24 assists at 10.8% shooting. When top players consistently outpace their expected goals, either they're genuinely elite finishers or they're riding a wave.

Dallas answers with concentrated scoring. Jason Robertson generates 0.96 xG/60 with 25 goals, 21 assists, two high-danger goals, and 12.4% shooting—production that marks a first-tier scorer. Michael Bunting, at 0.83 xG/60 with 8 goals and 14 assists on 7.6% shooting, provides secondary pressure but isn't a load-carrier.

Both teams are producing high-danger chances at historically low rates, a constraint on offensive ceiling. Dallas's 1.024 PDO is the structural vulnerability: the Stars are cashing in above expectation, and reversion to mean is the default.

St. Louis's path requires Dallas to regress while the Blues steal efficiency. The possession metrics favor the home team, but not by the margin needed to guarantee outcome. At 53%, the model isn't hedging. It's saying the home team is favored by roughly a coin flip.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

STL
Jimmy Snuggerud15G 22A
0.86 xG/60 · 2 HD · 11.9% sh
Dylan Holloway13G 24A
0.82 xG/60 · 1 HD · 10.8% sh
DAL
Jason Robertson25G 21A
0.96 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.4% sh
Michael Bunting8G 14A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 7.6% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters