Backcheck
Recap · WPG at NJD

Jets hold off the Devils

The Jets won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 12, 2:49 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
WPG
Winnipeg Jets
4
Home
NJD
New Jersey Devils
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.40Expected goals3.37
50% share for the better side
26Shot attempts (SOG)29
5High-danger chances4
49Corsi (all attempts)63
Score-adjusted: 40% / 61%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Devils controlled this game by the underlying numbers — 53% of shot attempts, 3.40 expected goals — yet lost 4-3. New Jersey's advantage never materialized, a gap written by goaltending and finishing.

The play was even where it mattered. Expected goals split 3.37–3.40, essentially tied. High-danger chances favored Winnipeg slightly, 5–4. The Devils generated more volume but less quality: 0.053 xG per shot versus Winnipeg's 0.069.

Connor Hellebuyck made the difference. He posted a 0.897 save percentage (26/29 saves), clinical and efficient. John Allen stumbled to 0.846 (22/26 saves), running 0.60 percentage points below expectation.

Winnipeg's rush game was lethal: 3 goals on 21 chances. The Devils matched that rate (3/26) but wasted their superior volume. They crashed the net effectively, generating 4 rebound opportunities, but converted none. New Jersey's power play was the game's only dominant advantage — 2 goals on 16 shots, 1.03 expected goals — yet even that couldn't bridge the gap.

The turning point came in the second period: Nico Hischier's tip-in from the slot at 18:14, pulling New Jersey to within a goal.

Three Stars

  • #86 J. Hughes (NJD) — 2A in 25:14
  • #55 M. Scheifele (WPG) — 1G, 1A in 20:35
  • #81 K. Connor (WPG) — 2A in 20:35
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
WPG1 / 5 · 1.80 xG
NJD1 / 4 · 0.95 xG
Medium dangermid-range
WPG2 / 9 · 1.02 xG
NJD2 / 18 · 1.93 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
WPG1 / 35 · 0.58 xG
NJD0 / 41 · 0.48 xG

WPG went 2-for-9 from medium danger on 1.02 expected goals — 1.0 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
WPG
4 G · 3.40 xG · +0.6
NJD
3 G · 3.37 xG · -0.4
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
C. HellebuyckWPG
+0.4
J. AllenNJD
-0.6

WPG finished +0.6 against expected, NJD -0.4 — J. Allen (NJD) allowed 0.6 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
WPG
WRIST3/15
SNAP1/13
SLAP0/6
TIP IN0/2
BACKHAND0/2
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/11
NJD
WRIST1/15
SNAP0/6
SLAP1/10
TIP IN1/6
BACKHAND0/2
DEFLECTED0/2
OTHER0/22
WPG
NJD
Off the rush
3 G on 21 · 2.49 xG
3 G on 26 · 2.23 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 2 · 0.44 xG
0 G on 4 · 0.72 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: WPG went 3-for-15, NJD 1-for-15. WPG scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Hughes
#86 · C · NJD
0 G · 2 A · 6 SOG · 25:14 TOI · -1
M. Scheifele
#55 · C · WPG
1 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 20:35 TOI · +1
K. Connor
#81 · L · WPG
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 20:35 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • WPG had the higher quality looks — 0.069 xG/shot vs 0.053.
  • NJD was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 26 rush chances.
  • WPG was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 21 rush chances.
  • NJD created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NJD power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 16 PP shots (1.03 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · WPG at NJD · 7:00 PM ET

Jets at Devils: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 2:47 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

53%
NJD
Model favorite
47%
53%
WPG50NJD

NJD by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score WPG 2.42.6 NJD; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

WPG← edge
edge →NJD
48.0%5v5 xG%50.0%
49.0%Corsi%51.0%
2.34xGF / 602.45
2.55xGA / 602.50
1.90Goals for / gm1.66
2.10Goals against / gm2.23
0.998PDO — luck, not skill0.971

NJD holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.998 vs 0.971) says WPG has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.4–2.6 goal spread with the Devils at 53% win probability — essentially a toss-up.

New Jersey comes in underwater at -11 goal differential over its last ten games, a worrying trend even as the advanced stats hint at better days ahead. The Devils' 50.0% expected goals share and 51.0% Corsi% both track the league's middle, but their 0.971 PDO suggests they're running cold and due for positive regression.

Winnipeg's numbers tell a different story: a 48.0% xG% and 49.0% Corsi% indicate a team being outshot at even strength. The Jets' shooting luck has been better—Kyle Connor sits at 13.0%, meaningfully above league average—but their expected goals generation lags.

The matchup hinges on managing elite creators. Timo Meier leads New Jersey's offense with 1.08 xG/60 and has 13 goals, plus three that came on high-danger chances. Jack Hughes, at 0.88 xG/60, has posted 18 goals despite modest shot quality, a testament to his efficiency. Winnipeg's Nino Niederreiter (0.87 xG/60, 6 goals) and Connor (0.83 xG/60, 25 goals) generate similar underlying chances but have converted at different rates—Niederreiter at 8.6%, Connor at 13.0%—a gap that's unsustainable.

New Jersey's defensive weak link is Johnathan Kovacevic. Winnipeg's is Colin Miller. Both teams have struggled to generate secondary scoring: neither club has registered a goal from high-danger situations (HD goal rate at 0% for both) or off rebounds, meaning they're dependent on their top talent converting chances that come.

That dependency is precisely what makes this a true pick'em.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

WPG
Nino Niederreiter6G 6A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 8.6% sh
Kyle Connor25G 30A
0.83 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.0% sh
NJD
Timo Meier13G 15A
1.08 xG/60 · 3 HD · 6.7% sh
Jack Hughes18G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.5% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters