Jets hold off the Panthers
The Jets earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
Winnipeg's 2-1 victory over Florida understated the Jets' dominance. The Panthers controlled 57% of shot attempts (28–21), but their chances were inferior — Winnipeg's shots were worth nearly triple the xG per attempt (0.079 vs. 0.036), translating to a 57-43 advantage in expected goals (2.75–2.04).
E. Comrie made the difference where it mattered most. The Jets' goaltender stopped 27 of 28 shots (0.964 SV%) and outperformed his expected save percentage by 1.04 goals, cashing in when Florida's opportunism failed. S. Bobrovsky answered in kind for the Panthers—19 saves on 21 shots (0.905 SV%), also overperforming by 0.75 goals—but couldn't overcome the quality gap.
The high-danger zone exposed the gap. Winnipeg converted 2 of 4 HD chances (50%), while Florida managed only 3 chances from that range. Mark Scheifele's wrist shot from the slot at 15:46 of the third period proved the dagger.
Florida arrived with volume but left without precision. The Panthers' underlying performance showed they were outmatched where it counts: Winnipeg's shot efficiency, Comrie's positioning, and clinical finishing in the dangerous areas combined to make 2-1 feel like a runaway.
The danger ladder
WPG went 0-for-11 from medium danger on 1.38 expected goals — 1.4 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
WPG finished -0.8 against expected, FLA -1.0 — E. Comrie (WPG) saved 1.0 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: WPG went 2-for-4, FLA 0-for-27.
- FLA had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
- E. Comrie (WPG) stopped 1.0 goals above expected.
- WPG had the higher quality looks — 0.079 xG/shot vs 0.036.
- WPG was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/4 on HD chances (50%).